Lurker > Intro2Logic

Crazy how people follow these nothing politicians

The first term isn't over

Stop giving this guy clicks

This is not something gun control can fix. Dollars to donuts these guns are illegal to begin with.

A good start would be creating an internet police force capable of cracking down on hackers and scammers, while also cleaning up the World Wide Web of misinformation/disinformation posts and websites.

Not that it matters anyway. SF was burned to the ground two years ago, along with every other liberal city on the west coast.

Why are businesses leaving San Francisco in record numbers?

The fact that u cant have an intelligent conversation like two civilized people without reverting back to political views is what bothers you.

You gotta wonder how many people know that or even go out of their way to seek those polls out to have an accurate number or the word majority lol

Apparently it's happened before?

As Ive argued on this blog and elsewhere for yearsand as (actual) journalists, lawyers and Human Rights groups have documented for much longerthe vast majority of the FBIs splashy terror arrests that our media repeats are, upon further inspection, pushed, designed, and curated by the FBI themselves and almost always involve no actual terrorists or terror groups beyond the ones simulated by undercover agents and informants.

Its one of the genuinely predictable facts of media criticism: See a headline about the FBI swooping in and foiling a terror plot, stopping terror financing, or thwarting a terror trip to Syria or Iraq, theres a 99 percent chance there was no actual terrorists involvedbut only an elaborate network of paid informants and undercover agents. And this isnt just a number pulled out of thin air: According to one 2013 study by researcher Trevor Aaronson, less than one percent of terror plots foiled by the FBI are real plots, in the sense that they would have occurred whether the FBI was monitoring them or not.

Gonna have to make an awful lot of trains.

Getting rid of cars should be the future

Puto is neither a synonym of gay, nor used as attack on someone's sexuality. It basically means p****, sissy, slut, whore

If your "unintentional" insult is repeated and time and again - after being informed that others are taking it as offensive, after being sanctioned multiple times for having continued to use the term - at some point you're not merely using the term in its original intent but as a middle finger to those who have told you to stop.

Yes, and I am telling you what we actually intend with the word in this mexican chant,

You immediately jumped to the fact that it was a word when it wasn't even specified in the article.

The chant is not "anti-gay" .

but this s*** is tradition that has been going on for decades