Lurker > Fony

DeroIin posted...

Been talking/seeing this girl off Bumble and while shes a nice person, it just affects my attractiveness to her and when it comes to intimacy, as a result, theres been some issues.

so is it fatphobic? Am I fatphobic?

Why are you speaking to her? Serious question. Sit, think and answer. Why? Are you that lonely or horny? It makes no sense.

The obsession continues

Fallout 4 is just under 40GB and can exceed the free space on the "64GB" steam deck with a handful of mods.

MaxEffingBemis posted...

Minnesota does not seem like the type of state this would happen in. But god this sucks anywhere

Lol, what? You clearly dont know that certain stars are only blue, liberal, democrat because the massive urban voter base which resembles nothing of the non urban residents.

Seattle, Portland, Pittsburgh, Philly, NYC.swells of blue voters in a red forest.

https://tinyurl.com/mszyawmp

Word of the posts spread quickly throughout the school and caused outrage among students and their families. Students and their families held unity rallies on and off campus as the school community grappled with the incident.

Some of the students targeted in the posts began to suffer in various ways, including losing sleep and missing days of school. Many students reported to administration that they were too upset to go to class. One student even withdrew from the school altogether.
The school administration responded with various kinds of discipline, and eventually expelled both Epple and Chen.

Both students sued, claiming that the expulsion was a violation of their free speech rights under both the First Amendment and California law. Their lawsuit argued that the Instagram posts had been private, and that like the cheerleader in the recent Fuck school fuck softball fuck cheer fuck everything case, they should have the right to speak freely in an off-campus setting.
In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled 8 to 1 in favor of the cheerleader. The justices found that although her speech had been vulgar, the teen had a right to criticize her school, particularly given that the speech had occurred off-campus and did not risk classmates safety.
However, the 9th Circuit, as had been the district court before it, was clear that Epple and Chens conduct was a far cry from the cheerleaders protected comments.

A three-judge panel which included U.S. Circuit Judge Daniel Collins, a Donald Trump appointee; U.S. Circuit Judge Ronald Gould, a Bill Clinton appointee; and Senior U.S. District Judge Roslyn Silver, another Clinton appointee sitting by designation from the District of Arizona; ruled that the likelihood of substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities in the case was obvious and that the district was well within its rights to expel both students.
Collins wrote the opinion for the unanimous panel, which noted that the posts created havoc at the school. Even students who were not targeted by the posts became distraught and were among a group who spontaneously gathered together, crying and yelling and too upset to go to class,' Collins noted.

The panel made short work of any argument that Epples posts should not have been censored by the school as they might be protected as political ideology. Collins wrote that given that Epple admitted that he posted simply to entertain [his] friends, any claim that they sought to make a political statement rings hollow.

Similarly, the panel smacked down Epples argument that his posts were meant to be private and circulated only among a small group of chosen followers.

Collins wrote called the posts a ticking bomb of vicious targeted abuse that could be readily detonated by anyone following the account, and said Epple should have expected the school to retaliate with discipline.

Got what they deserved.

bsp77 posted...

I have one episode left. It is generic, the elves are the exact same as humans, the CGI is suspect, and this is a complete retcon of what Andrej intended. But it isn't as bad as the audience "ratings", and the vast majority haven't even watched it. It is somewhat entertaining.

Michelle Yeoh's character and the dwarf are great. The rest of the characters are meh.

Is it as bad as the Legitimate critic ratings from actual media? RT has it a 33% and my friend seems to think it's appropriate.

When has he been any different? Or were you guys just busy sucking his dick over stupid electric cars? He's never posted anything good on Twitter to make anyone think he was a decent person. He literally just started posting more than he used to. A rich south african who scammed someone out of leadership of his company and uses slave labor, sure he was a good guy at one point...lmao.

Bitter_Virgin posted...

The 26-year-old said: My body is considered a danger on social media and I am constantly being cancelled by trolls for doing absolutely nothing but sharing photos of my body. These days, you see a lot of overweight or even obese women online, talking about body positivity but when a beautiful, tall woman wants to be positive in her own skin, people want to attack me and call me privileged.

The Slovakian bombshell added: They are just jealous of my naturally fit body.

She makes an excellent point.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Ngl like 6 steps down from Gisele.

Copium. Gisele is overrated and was overrated in her prime.

Cope.

They're the only place spinning this as the job's fault but nice try.

Zikten posted...

I've seen people on the internet blaming her boss for not letting her stay home that day and making her come in during an insane storm

this is only being said by r/antiwork and probably spread to twitter form there. you also picked the only news outlet that didn't include any details about this story.

Smackems posted...

Work place boss ethic in this country is dogshit

dumbass.
Realforce posted...

Heard it was the cabon monoxide instead of the extreme cold that got her? Because the snow was blocking the exhaust?

Either way, this is fucked.

Yes, if snow builds up behind you car you MUST find a way to either clear the exhaust OR open the windows every so often to vent the car because you won't be able to tell you're dying.

thronedfire2 posted...

article says she was in scrubs, so if she's a nurse or works in healthcare she's mandated to go in even during a blizzard(or at least in some states, idk about NY)

I've had to drive to work in the middle of storms that were dropping 3 feet of snow

she was told everything she needed to know beforehand. She fought against the warnings and demanded to brave the weather...literally to "be with her mom" as a grown woman...smh.

Not this clickbait spin form r/antiwork. You should have posted the truth and real facts in your post.

She left against her bosses demands(and the storm warnings of the pas week) because her mother and her had some weird narcissistic codependent relationship. She didn't know shit about living in upstate NY, beeing from the south. She killed herself.

Her job was a hopsital dude, they always order staff to bunker in during severe weather and offer them beds to sleep in and of course they have plenty of food.

Que?

Clickbait

I dont get it.

KlownArt posted...

This is the part that makes this confusing. You don't bring your new girlfriend/boyfriend to meet your parents after only two months. You barely know each other. Thinking you've earned the right feels like those people that think everyone they date is "the one" and they don't want to wait to let it play out a bit.

In that same vein, it's typically abnormal to move in with someone after two months. So, you are on a strange trajectory. Good luck.

The girl is likely in need of a place to stay for the time beingits an old game.

SHRlKE posted...

Been with my girlfriend for about two months and shes recently moved in.

Lmao, the life of hobosexual men and women falling in love to pay the rent. Moving in 8weeks in.lol.

Anyway, Ive never introduced anyone to my family two months in, but I take dating seriously and dont bring everyone I just started seeing a few weeks ago to meet the parents.

As far as giving her a ride, dont. But you probably will. Youre clearly being used as a place to stay for now and youre going right along with it.

Racism is bad.

Theyre also a sex offender.

Its going to become a young adult romance with a fantasy backdrop.

Co-ordinated with China's violation of Taiwanese air space

My FWB liked the original Netflix show and said it was too bad/uninteresting to continue watching.

DoesntMatter posted...

that's the kind of women who would be willing to participate in a 10-person "polycule"

yea, definitely been on the shelf too long in life but got to act out her delusion at least.

i think they broke up and just had a business relationship for most fo the time they were rich. she had some weird harem in south america. this dude scammed the whole world and couldn't hold on to that.

By "not unprotected" he probably means she said she was taking bc or had the morning after pill and he believed her.

Doom_Art posted...

yes, my friend understands that bit. he's gonna push for that and based on what he knows of her, she probably won't be opposed to going through the legal system either

unless she has a hidden vindictive streak he is unaware of

>:(

she doesn't have to agree to any of this, she can be served with papers and should be formally regardless of what "your friend" and her verbally agree to. if "your friend" wants a free consultation with a real lawyer who specializes in family/custody law you can PM me and i can put them in touch with someone for a free consultation.

It has to be done through the courts, no matter what. Your friend is just some asshole with no parental rights who could still be put on child support in the future otherwise.

Doom_Art posted...

Yeah my friend wants to ideally work out a co-parent situation where they split custody of the kid.

Are those rights just a thing that kicks in automatically?

see my post.

Doom_Art posted...

There's no ill will between him and the woman he was with, but they don't have a desire to get together either. They are not married, not common law, nothing.

She expressed a desire to keep the pregnancy since she's in a stable position in her life with a good job, a house, and wanted a child someday anyway.

No comment(that can be posted here).

Doom_Art posted...

What rights does my friend have? He has no reason to think she would deprive him of being able to see his hypothetical child, but all the same he might take comfort in knowing he would still be legally entitled to at least some parental rights.

Differs slightly state to state but if he wants to be a father, he will have to go to court most likely. While if they were married or actually dating he'd be presumed the father, they're not. In most states fathers have no rights in his situation until paternity is established. Don't let him be a dumbass about this. NO "trust" her, "work it out" or verbally agree on jack shit. It all needs to be handled in court as soon as that kid's blood can be tested.

Oh_Boy_ posted...

What I expected: Pitbull activists ignoring valid posts about real solutions that don't impede their ability to fawn over pitbulls, while singling out someone to argue blindly with and maybe trot out the tired, racist "black people" comparison.

What I got: Exactly what I expected.

You know it. Every time.

CyricZ posted...

Let's be real Legends was largely crap. Lotta rose colored glasses.

What we got now is crap, along with political colored glasses.

Damn, one of their other staff was killed as well last month.

JuanCarlos1 posted...

They also consider other details like art direction

And it's not the best on that front either.

Lmao. It didn't have the best graphics at any point this year, not even on PlayStation.

I4NRulez posted...

they usually are. Dogs that are deemed too dangerous or unfit to be around other people or dogs are put down.

It happened to my dads dog when he lost his house.

Sometimes they're sent to no kill shelters and "rehabilitated" and adopted back out. One story about a pit killing its owner was one such case, she adopted the dog, had to bring it back because of aggression to others and other animals. She would go visit the dog frequently at the shelter and it killed her one day. Probably an ex-fighter that should have been destroyed on the spot.

There is really no federal laws about this stuff so no standards, everything is different from town to town in how aggressive dogs get handled.

No, there should be laws on how they can be legally obtained(crack down on backyard breeders) and who owns them(felons, sjw "dog moms" who can't control them, etc.) as well as how they're housed. Legally requiring education, physical walking tests with adult dogs and a license to own pitbulls and other dangerous dogs breeds should be no problem for you "good owners" out there. Some rules like this exist for pitbulls in some places in the US, we just need them expanded and to include all states. Also former fighting dogs need to be put down or permanently housed in a shelter.

You have to look at PS fans as the village idiot, all will be well after that.

My older brother. You'd have to hear it to believe it. I always use to think one day his whole brain was going to come out his nostrils.

Lol.

Arguing to argue.

Some cities in the United States have banned Rottweilers under breed specific laws. For example, Collins, Mississippi, has a citywide ban on Rottweilers and pit bulls. The DogsBite website offers a complete listing of cities that ban Rottweilers and other breeds. These bans have been ruled constitutional by both federal and state courts. The bans are because of fears that some people have about Rottweilers. Although the facts are debatable, some people are concerned that all Rottweilers are bred to attack and that their owners can't control them adequately.

Some communities choose not to ban Rottweilers but rather place restrictions on owners of the dogs or charge them fees. In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, owners of dogs whose breeding is half or more Rottweiler must keep the dog within a yard with a fence tall enough to contain it or keep the dog in a kennel that meets specific requirements. Anyone who walks a Rottweiler must be 16 or older and big enough to handle the dog. In Corinth, Mississippi, Rottweilers are defined by city statute as vicious animals. As of 2012, anyone who owns a vicious animal in Corinth must have a $25,000 insurance policy covering liability if the dog attacks someone. Owners must get special permits before keeping a vicious animal in Corinth.

In cities where Rottweilers aren't banned, some housing communities and apartment complexes have site-specific regulations in place that don't allow residents to own Rottweilers. In Queens, New York, people who live in city-run housing can't keep Rottweilers, pit bulls or Doberman pinschers on the property. The ban was put in place after other residents complained the dogs were too vicious. In Laurel, Maryland, an apartment complex made the news in November 2012 after it told a disabled resident who used a Rottweiler as service dog that she had to leave or give up the dog because the breed was banned from the apartment.

These kinds of measure just need to be expanded to more places, and again this doesn't even only apply to pits. You guys can keep coping though. It is blind crusaderism on your part.

What does any of this mean?

Here comes the race science angle. Christ.

Exactly, these fools aren't proposing a solution. They're actually against doing anything to help the situation.

Lmao, he's getting the women he wants and they're getting the lifestyle they want...that's all. Stop projecting.

Two opposing extremes of dumbassery still make you all dumbasses, to whoever thinks on either extreme end of "genocide" and "do nothing and deny the issue".

Banning breeding and owning pits outside of regulated or approved channels would stop backyard breeders and allow law enforcementtoactually do something about them.

A ban doesn't mean pitbulls can't exist. These childish fools here don't even address the realistic, human, practical issues being raised. Just maladjusted fools thinking in care bear logic.

There is no reasoning with pitbull activists, as the rational part of their brain has atrophied. As I sad before, pitbulls are just their outlet and their real problem is mental instability.