Lurker > andel

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 7:09:44 PM
#177
AltonBrownFan posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
Who gives a damn what their endgame is? They're f***ing Nazis. Their endgame doesn't have a prayer in the world in a country like America, especially if we don't suppress them like fascists.

Are you so sure it doesn't? This is the same country with the kkk and Jim Crow. And for as much as you like to pretend as if these ideas absolutely will not face any sort of resurgence in the mainstream, then why have we been seeing so many of our recent voter ID laws getting struck down due to racial discrimination?


so far you have completely abandoned your original argument and contribute only 'what ifs' instesd of a substantive position
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 6:30:53 PM
#169

So why was the National guard called in? Why do you keep ignoring that question?


i already addressed it, they were called in to enforce the law. when people violate the law the government is justified in using force, which is completely justified. if neo nazis are violating the civil rights of people it is completely justified for the government to intervene, still not ok for random people to attack others for using words
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 6:18:27 PM
#163
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
So why did we need the national guard to enforce it? Why do you keep on ignoring that part every time I bring it up? And if society had progressed to the point of civility then why would you need a law to enforce integration in the first place? You keep on skipping over those gaps in your own argument, which only undermines the entire point in the first place.


the government enforces its laws by threatening force if you dont comply, this is the same for literally every law. that is not violence and certainly does not justify vigilante behavior. your entire argument is a god of the gaps type presentation that remains devoid of any facts. the constant theme here is that the kkk and other scumbag groups have been marginalized legally and without violence against the bad people

The threat of violence is an enforcement mechanism of the state. It's part and parcel of enforcing laws in the first place. You can't divorce the part that violence has in enforcing laws, cause how do they get enforced at all if there's nobody there to arrest you if you break them? So by being in a state where societal change is enacted through legislation you're implying that the only way this change could ever have occurred in the first place is by threat of violence. Did schools become integrated before or after legislative or judicial action? If it occurred afterwards then you can't sit here and wax poetically about how violence didn't play a a part at all. And it's ironic as shit that you're going off about how I'm arguing utilizing God of the Gaps while ignoring how the national guard was sent out to help enforce integration safely. Why were they called in Andel? Why were men with guns required to descend on elementary schools if everyone was on board with the dismantling of white supremacist rhetoric? If they weren't required then why were they called? You keep on ignoring this point (while arguing the gaps in my posts unironically). Hey Andel, why was the National Guard called in? Hey Andel, if society had progressed so finely then why was a civil rights act required? What was the opinion of the Civil Rights act like at the time? Do you believe it garnered universal fanfare? Do you believe it passed without a hitch and nary a complaint? Hey, if spirited debate was all that was required for white supremacist rhetoric to die down then why did the state have to pass a law requiring people to be less racist? If white supremacist rhetoric was done and dead then why did people with guns need to stand outside of elementary schools or walk little black girls to their classrooms?

Hey Andel, if you believe that sprited debate is all that's required then why can't you answer such seemingly simple questions without needing to bullshit and argue in poor faith?


you seem unhinged and incapable of looking at historical precedent without invoking a logical fallacy.

you have abandoned the meat of your argument and clung to some weird notion that laws being enforced means the kkk wasnt in fact rendered impotent by society progressing. you have been utterly incapable of making a connection to vigilante acts and the diminishing impact of supremicist groups, while vigilante acts are the actual topic of discussion here. the kkk was absolutely shamed into obscurity in a nonviolent way, this is fact and no amount of cognitive dissonance on your part will change that.

violence in response to political views is unacceptable and illegal, it will remain so. you have no argument here
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:53:05 PM
#159
AltonBrownFan posted...
So why did we need the national guard to enforce it? Why do you keep on ignoring that part every time I bring it up? And if society had progressed to the point of civility then why would you need a law to enforce integration in the first place? You keep on skipping over those gaps in your own argument, which only undermines the entire point in the first place.


the government enforces its laws by threatening force if you dont comply, this is the same for literally every law. that is not violence and certainly does not justify vigilante behavior. your entire argument is a god of the gaps type presentation that remains devoid of any facts. the constant theme here is that the kkk and other scumbag groups have been marginalized legally and without violence against the bad people
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy does soccer exist if hockey takes that concept and makes it SO much better?
andel
04/23/17 5:45:11 PM
#15
nah soccer is much more graceful than hockey and features much better athletes
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:32:42 PM
#157

If violence had no part in the decline of their rhetoric then why did we go to war with Nazis? If violence had no part in the decline of white supremacists and the KKK then why did we need a literal civil rights act to enforce integration? And if everything was so hunky dory after forcing integration then why was the national guard required to escort black students to their new classrooms?

And if all that played a part in seeing the decline in nazi and white supremacist rhetoric then why do you believe that all it takes for people to move away from those ways of thinking is merely sitting down and talking to them? And if that's all it takes do you believe that it accounts for everyone that espouses those views or do you think a spirited debate will sway only a handful of them?


we went to war because the japanese attacked us, which is common knowledge. the civil rights act is a law, a sign of progress and that debate and civility win out at the end of the day. passing a law is the antithesis of violence and vigilante behavior, it is the codification of progress. if you think random assualts against people that hold bad views is effective at changing public perception in favor of progress you honestly have no knowledge of history or how tangible progress is actually achieved.
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:15:05 PM
#155
Neoconkers posted...
how much of a nazi does someone have to be for it to be alright for someone to punch them? at which point do they cross the line from not punchable to punchable?


committing acts of violence is the threshold that makes it ok to attack them back. anything else is legally and morally unacceptable
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:13:58 PM
#154
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed.

How did this progression occur? Do you believe it's justifiable to send the National Guard out whenever neo-nazis hold a protest?


no, but it is justifiable to do it neo nazis violate federal law. the parallel you are trying to paint doesnt exist and violence against people you disagree with is not justified, ever unless they are committing acts of violence

The parallel does exist. You and Mal are going out of your way to imply that merely debating and talking and hashing out differences is all it took for the decline in white supremacist and nazi logic to decline. That's absolutely not the case. The decline in their rhetoric took a world War, several decades of strife, legislative action, and the National Guard sticking their rifles in people's faces for it to finally go away. So why do you believe that merely debating them is the answer when we've already seen the end results of this rhetoric and what it takes for it to go away?


you are being disingenuous with this argument and have provided no evidence beyond your own assertions. no one went out attacking the kkk yet they are universally maligned and have no political capital

How did that malignant occur though? If you can't argue that it declined due to merely debating them then why are you so insist that it's the answer now? And how am I being disingenuous? Care to explain, or Naw?


it did decline due to education and debate, yes. it certainly wasn't violence as we have established so your attempt to create a parallel has failed. political violence wasnt acceptable then and obviously not necessary so it clearly isnt now either. you have basically validated my position itt
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:09:44 PM
#149
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
if they physically engage you that is justification for fighting them, simple words dont and will never justify violence.


So I used the wrong word. Instead of justify, I should have said elicit. So more so, do you think that provocative words could be a directly related cause to a violent response?

the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed. these neo nazis are also bound by the law and will be prosecuted if they commit violent actions as well. this is all that is necessary, attacking them gives them a platform and publicity they would never get otherwise


It's hard to prosecute them when high ranking members are writing the laws and drones are enforcing the laws.


people may attack others because of words, it is never justifiable though.


Nuh uh. I asked if the words could be directly responsible for eliciting a violent response.


no. people are responsible for their actions, you cant put it on other people no matter what they say
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:08:59 PM
#148
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed.

How did this progression occur? Do you believe it's justifiable to send the National Guard out whenever neo-nazis hold a protest?


no, but it is justifiable to do it neo nazis violate federal law. the parallel you are trying to paint doesnt exist and violence against people you disagree with is not justified, ever unless they are committing acts of violence

The parallel does exist. You and Mal are going out of your way to imply that merely debating and talking and hashing out differences is all it took for the decline in white supremacist and nazi logic to decline. That's absolutely not the case. The decline in their rhetoric took a world War, several decades of strife, legislative action, and the National Guard sticking their rifles in people's faces for it to finally go away. So why do you believe that merely debating them is the answer when we've already seen the end results of this rhetoric and what it takes for it to go away?


you are being disingenuous with this argument and have provided no evidence beyond your own assertions. no one went out attacking the kkk yet they are universally maligned and have no political capital
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:07:10 PM
#145
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
if they physically engage you that is justification for fighting them, simple words dont and will never justify violence.


So I used the wrong word. Instead of justify, I should have said elicit. So more so, do you think that provocative words could be a directly related cause to a violent response?

the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed. these neo nazis are also bound by the law and will be prosecuted if they commit violent actions as well. this is all that is necessary, attacking them gives them a platform and publicity they would never get otherwise


It's hard to prosecute them when high ranking members are writing the laws and drones are enforcing the laws.


people may attack others because of words, it is never justifiable though.

if you expose someone high in the government in any state as a neo nazi or kkk member it will end their political career and if they are committing crimes all you have to do is present some evidence and as a society we will be glad to lock them up. this is still no justification for violence
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 5:01:22 PM
#140
AltonBrownFan posted...
andel posted...
the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed.

How did this progression occur? Do you believe it's justifiable to send the National Guard out whenever neo-nazis hold a protest?


no, but it is justifiable to do it neo nazis violate federal law. the parallel you are trying to paint doesnt exist and violence against people you disagree with is not justified, ever unless they are committing acts of violence
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:57:55 PM
#138
AltonBrownFan posted...
Mal_Fet posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
Mal_Fet posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...

How much did sprited debates lead to the decline of the KKK?

How much did open violence lead to their decline?

I'm not saying racists MUST be debated. Pointing and laughing at them is fine too.

So their number declined by mere ridicule?

And (nonviolent) civil rights protests which swayed the hearts and minds of the population, yes.

So far more than just debating and mere ridicule. Do you believe it was only the civil rights protests that saw a decline in the KKK? And do you believe it was just protesting, and nothing else, that lead to those hearts and minds being changed?


no one went out and punched the kkk en masse. that didnt happen, progress happened and people dismissed their antiquated views
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:56:44 PM
#137
if they physically engage you that is justification for fighting them, simple words dont and will never justify violence.

AltonBrownFan posted...
Mal_Fet posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
emblem boy posted...
AltonBrownFan posted...
Why would you debate a nazi when history has already shown that nazis aren't interested in discussing their views in good faith and are only interested in spreading their rhetoric?


When you're debating them you're not really trying to convince the extremists. You're trying to convince all the people on the fence and you have to appeal to them.

And we've already seen where those debates have lead to. What makes debating Nazis in the year 20xx so fundamentally different from debating them in 19xx where you believe that talking down their arguments won't see their idealogy spread?

False equivalence.

The KKK march through towns on a relatively routine basis and yet their membership dwindles every year. When was the last case you heard of a person suckerpunching a KKK ghost?

How much did sprited debates lead to the decline of the KKK? Is it really a false equivalence when their decline was due to far more than debating them? Do you believe that debating the KKK would have prevented them from gaining any sort of prominence in the first place?


the kkk was shut down because society progressed and they were prosecuted for violence or other crimes they committed. these neo nazis are also bound by the law and will be prosecuted if they commit violent actions as well. this is all that is necessary, attacking them gives them a platform and publicity they would never get otherwise
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:45:26 PM
#121
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
it is an attempt to silence someone because they say something you dont like.


Yes, that is the causality of wanting to strike someone over their words.

and yes, free speech protects you from legalized violence no matter what you say as long as you arent blatantly starting a riot. it is never ok to attack someone for words


Free speech doesn't protect you from the consequences of your words. It protects your ability to speak them.

Why I don't agree with what you're saying though is entirely wrapped up in the absolutism of your statements. I think there's a case for both sides. You do not. Nevermind the inherent lack of personal accountability. If someone uses their words to threaten you, do you think there's no conceivable way where you may be justified in hitting them?


it absolutely legally protects you from violence. that is not debatable in the least. people can protest you from an economic perspective but not one has the right to attack you...not sure if you realize how wrong that statement is in the context you are trying to use it
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:38:51 PM
#115
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
american history is littered with awful things that were condoned. political violence is against the law because it galvanizes awful people and terrorism is never ok. it is never ok to attack people for words. when they start killing people we can wipe em out, when they are ineffectual nothings frothing with impotent rage we just point and laugh. attacking someone for simply speaking makes you a terrorist


I know why it's against the law. The specific definition of that where it's literally voter suppression is not what is being talked about here. It's just an assault case.

And you have got to be kidding me by saying that attacking someone for something they say makes you a terrorist. That's fucking loony. It's fucking terrorism to have to listen to someone speak of the genocide of my fellow citizen and myself.


it is an attempt to silence someone because they say something you dont like.

and yes, free speech protects you from legalized violence no matter what you say as long as you arent blatantly starting a riot. it is never ok to attack someone for words
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:33:00 PM
#109
TheFuzz3451 posted...
If you go out into public and start spewing your hateful ideology, I have zero issue with someone retaliating with a nice healthy punch to the face. People shouldn't just have to sit there and take it while someone declares them worthless and worthy of extermination.


if people cant handle idiots saying mean things they arent mature enough to be in public
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:29:00 PM
#106
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
It's funny that people think protesting is authoritarian, but don't think that codifying laws is anywhere near authoritarian.


protesting is not authoritarian, attacking people because of politics is


Yes, if it were that simple, it would certainly qualify as authoritarian. Regardless, it doesn't disclude the protesting just because some people in a protest get violent.


i encourage protesting, it is the cornerstone of american exceptionalism. i dont condone attacking political opponents though and that is what people itt are doing.


That's a pretty big part of American history that you don't condone. And are you really saying people in this topic are attacking people or do you mean the people the topic is referring to?


people itt are condoning political violence...that is pretty obviously what i am attacking.


Yeah, I misread that. Still seems to be 2 pretty big parts of American history to be ignoring.


american history is littered with awful things that were condoned. political violence is against the law because it galvanizes awful people and terrorism is never ok. it is never ok to attack people for words. when they start killing people we can wipe em out, when they are ineffectual nothings frothing with impotent rage we just point and laugh. attacking someone for simply speaking makes you a terrorist
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:24:25 PM
#101
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
It's funny that people think protesting is authoritarian, but don't think that codifying laws is anywhere near authoritarian.


protesting is not authoritarian, attacking people because of politics is


Yes, if it were that simple, it would certainly qualify as authoritarian. Regardless, it doesn't disclude the protesting just because some people in a protest get violent.


i encourage protesting, it is the cornerstone of american exceptionalism. i dont condone attacking political opponents though and that is what people itt are doing.


That's a pretty big part of American history that you don't condone. And are you really saying people in this topic are attacking people or do you mean the people the topic is referring to?


people itt are condoning political violence...that is pretty obviously what i am attacking.
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:19:35 PM
#97
-Gavirulax- posted...
Regressives - If you don't agree with punching someone you disagree with you must be a Nazi sympathizer.

Had he not been punched he wouldn't even be relevant now, not to mention you just don't punch someone because you don't wanna hear them.


they seem to be too dumb to understand this
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:19:11 PM
#96
Kineth posted...
andel posted...
Kineth posted...
It's funny that people think protesting is authoritarian, but don't think that codifying laws is anywhere near authoritarian.


protesting is not authoritarian, attacking people because of politics is


Yes, if it were that simple, it would certainly qualify as authoritarian. Regardless, it doesn't disclude the protesting just because some people in a protest get violent.


i encourage protesting, it is the cornerstone of american exceptionalism. i dont condone attacking political opponents though and that is what people itt are doing.
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:14:41 PM
#92
MixedMartialArt posted...
andel posted...
sorry, the opinion of someone unable to shut down nazis doesnt matter and you arent smart enough to ever accumulate any political capital.

must suck to be an impotent, low iq fascist like you eh?


Says the Nazi sympathizer.

Zero_Destroyer posted...
MixedMartialArt posted...
So we don't punch nazis to placate people dumb enough to sympathize with or be emboldened by them. makes sense.


It's easy to paint your point as correct when you use the term "nazi" as if Spencer & his ilk are referring to themselves as "Nazis" on the regular and as if white nationalists don't talk about how they supposedly hate white supremacy.

Their rhetoric - as I stated in my earlier post - is far less brazen, far more subtle, and painted to manipulate people. Are the people manipulated idiots? Yeah, I guess, but you can educate people to stop them from being idiots. A lot less destructive than the alternative of violence that will give their deranged movement a public platform.


eliminate one, bring the rest to light. You're literally advocating keeping nazis "in the closet" so to speak.


'if you dont support political terrorism you are a nazi sympathizer'

gg, you lose. try and understand what words mean before talking with the adults
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 4:12:04 PM
#90
Kineth posted...
It's funny that people think protesting is authoritarian, but don't think that codifying laws is anywhere near authoritarian.


protesting is not authoritarian, attacking people because of politics is
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 3:06:16 PM
#57
Zero_Destroyer posted...
MixedMartialArt posted...
So we don't punch nazis to placate people dumb enough to sympathize with or be emboldened by them. makes sense.


It's easy to paint your point as correct when you use the term "nazi" as if Spencer & his ilk are referring to themselves as "Nazis" on the regular and as if white nationalists don't talk about how they supposedly hate white supremacy.

Their rhetoric - as I stated in my earlier post - is far less brazen, far more subtle, and painted to manipulate people. Are the people manipulated idiots? Yeah, I guess, but you can educate people to stop them from being idiots. A lot less destructive than the alternative of violence that will give their deranged movement a public platform.


people dumb enough to support violence to silence the opposition are thankfully devoid of any political capital and have no representation is making national or state policy. we should point and laugh at them like we do the alt right and other extremists
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 3:00:36 PM
#53
MixedMartialArt posted...
andel posted...
wrong, but obviously you support fascism


Says the Nazi sympathizer.


sorry, the opinion of someone unable to shut down nazis doesnt matter and you arent smart enough to ever accumulate any political capital.

must suck to be an impotent, low iq fascist like you eh?
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 2:57:52 PM
#50
MixedMartialArt posted...
andel posted...
MixedMartialArt posted...
pinky0926 posted...
No, what I want is a world in which the punishment for the horrible stuff you think is not an instant assassination hit squad like what you're advocating. You literally think that we should allow people to instigate physical violence without anything approaching a court of law. We don't even advocate the police being allowed to do that, never mind every citizen on the streets.


You advocate using the system to quell the problem when the problem used the system to gain its power and can/will do it again. It's not an either or system like you present. If we could stamp out Nazism with only the use of the system you would have a point. We can't. You don't. Tagging you as sympathizer.


sorry, you dont get to attack your political opponent, even if they are vile and you have no political capital to end free speech so your opinion is irrelevant


Another sympathizer. You're a disgrace.


wrong, but obviously you support fascism
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 2:56:48 PM
#48
SGT_Conti posted...
andel posted...
The Admiral posted...
You're worse than the person spewing hate speech if you assault them purely for their views. Just to be clear on how big of a piece of shit you both are.


this. people that try and justify violence because the person assualted is awful are low iq neanderthals and just as fascisy as the people they are trying to silence. you defeat ignorance and hate with arguments, not violence and terrorism

Debating someone also gives them a platform and legitimizes them. It's why people said Bill Nye having a debate with a creationist was a bad idea as well.


those people are dumb because that isnt how discourse works in this country. it isnt and will not be legal to physically attack your political opponents
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 2:55:46 PM
#46
MixedMartialArt posted...
pinky0926 posted...
No, what I want is a world in which the punishment for the horrible stuff you think is not an instant assassination hit squad like what you're advocating. You literally think that we should allow people to instigate physical violence without anything approaching a court of law. We don't even advocate the police being allowed to do that, never mind every citizen on the streets.


You advocate using the system to quell the problem when the problem used the system to gain its power and can/will do it again. It's not an either or system like you present. If we could stamp out Nazism with only the use of the system you would have a point. We can't. You don't. Tagging you as sympathizer.


sorry, you dont get to attack your political opponent, even if they are vile and you have no political capital to end free speech so your opinion is irrelevant
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicWhy you don't punch a Nazi.
andel
04/23/17 2:50:35 PM
#43
The Admiral posted...
You're worse than the person spewing hate speech if you assault them purely for their views. Just to be clear on how big of a piece of shit you both are.


this. people that try and justify violence because the person assualted is awful are low iq neanderthals and just as fascisy as the people they are trying to silence. you defeat ignorance and hate with arguments, not violence and terrorism
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicimagine being white and not liking spicy food
andel
04/22/17 10:39:04 PM
#81
pres_madagascar posted...
andel posted...
its generally black people that dont like spicy food in my experience

Umm what.


yep. other than bland louisiana hot sauce
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicAre white people the race that feels the most entitled?
andel
04/22/17 10:34:44 PM
#38
Kineth posted...
Imagine the delusions of grandeur that come from thinking that people are making fun of you because they're jealous.


it is super obvious with you at least. if someone feels the need to make fun of white people as a group it probably means they are projecting and are insecure.

sorry you are just an angry black guy that espouses angry rhetoric
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicAre white people the race that feels the most entitled?
andel
04/22/17 10:10:37 PM
#27
imagine trying to disparage white people out of jealousy lol
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicimagine being white and not liking spicy food
andel
04/22/17 9:17:58 PM
#66
its generally black people that dont like spicy food in my experience
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicIs cultural appropriation blown out of proportion?
andel
04/22/17 9:16:14 PM
#19
it isnt a thing so any outrage over it is snowflake syndrome
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicChechen gay men fear extermination by their region's Islamic government
andel
04/21/17 11:11:35 PM
#10
tag
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicSo is it really pee?
andel
04/21/17 11:01:07 PM
#11
byron posted...
rkman427 posted...
not always
most videos that look like waterfalls yeah

False.

It's always pee.

---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicso, my job actually had a 4/21 drug test today lol
andel
04/21/17 10:44:11 PM
#111
scoobydoobydont posted...
"I have the flu."

"Tough shit, you get tested now or you're fired."


well we know you aren't anyones boss so your response is impotent at best lol
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topic100% Guaranteed to get 1 million dollars or 50/50 chance to get 150 million?
andel
04/21/17 8:23:30 PM
#5
50/50 shot at 150. i will take a coin flip for a free shot at 150× easily
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicdemocrats should nominate hickenlooper in 2020
andel
04/21/17 8:06:56 PM
#10
scorpion41 posted...
andel posted...
scorpion41 posted...
I could see the campaign signs now: "I legalized weed." How is that a broad appeal again?


because 61% of americans support full legalization? p much all of his politics are spot on though.

if you don't think many people support legalization it just makes you ignorant tbh


So 61% of the population don't want a job?


actual good jobs dont drug test fyi
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topic"there is a problem with islam"
andel
04/21/17 5:00:05 PM
#178
mario2000 posted...
what's luelinks


a place where you shitpost(ed)?
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicHas the Admiral ever made a topic about friends or going outside
andel
04/21/17 4:51:05 PM
#240
what do you guys think is wrong with rod? obv he is not very smart but he seems deranged too
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topic"there is a problem with islam"
andel
04/21/17 4:42:31 PM
#176
mario2000 posted...
andel posted...
The Eternal Flame posted...
You're wasting your time, pinky. This guy is too far gone.


the funny thing is that im p sure i have seen him posting racist shit on eti.

what's eti


luelinks obv
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicdemocrats should nominate hickenlooper in 2020
andel
04/21/17 4:41:42 PM
#6
scorpion41 posted...
I could see the campaign signs now: "I legalized weed." How is that a broad appeal again?


because 61% of americans support full legalization? p much all of his politics are spot on though.

if you don't think many people support legalization it just makes you ignorant tbh
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicdemocrats should nominate hickenlooper in 2020
andel
04/21/17 4:35:13 PM
#3
his record is sterling and getting away from awful corporatists and empty identity politics panderers is a must
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topic"there is a problem with islam"
andel
04/21/17 4:33:57 PM
#170
The Eternal Flame posted...
You're wasting your time, pinky. This guy is too far gone.


the funny thing is that im p sure i have seen him posting racist shit on eti.
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topic"there is a problem with islam"
andel
04/21/17 4:33:13 PM
#169
tc shitposting...he seems to love defending islam and oppression of women and gays wtf
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicDutch police shoot machete-wielding Muslim shouting Allah akbar
andel
04/21/17 4:31:37 PM
#79
Kim Kusanagi posted...
-Gavirulax- posted...
his laughable make belief friend


edgy


sorry you dont like reality but we dont pander to children like you that defend terrorists
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Topicdemocrats should nominate hickenlooper in 2020
andel
04/21/17 4:28:37 PM
#1
he is a solid governor and pretty much well liked by everyone in colorado. it is important to not nominate an awful corporatist like booker if we want to win and this guy has broad appeal
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicCali Woman who left bacon at Mosque charged with hate crime
andel
04/21/17 4:22:46 PM
#161
if the trump sign burning is a hate crime this is too and vice versa
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
TopicI got banned from 4chan. Forever
andel
04/20/17 11:48:35 PM
#9
how do you even do that
---
I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10