Lurker > DawkinsNumber4

DelianSK posted...

https://www.reddit.com/r/AmIFreeToGo/comments/1agqlh/are_police_officers_required_to_give_me_their/c8xa8dt/

That's literally multiple years old from some random person. I am literally citing the 1st amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Which has more "street cred" do you think?
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Peter_Griffin33 posted...

Hey squader whats up with this fugitive from justice charge against you on 12/04/2014? Is that why you don't live in North Carolina anymore after you got fired from Subway?

No, that was because her mother stabbed herself 7 times. I told you that before but you started whining and then they banned me from that chat. I also had told you about the other charges as well. You just made up some ridiculous story about it that you apparently don't even remember. This is why I learned not to tell you shit. You turn it into something wayyyy different. That's part of why I wonder if lovefist is you. He does the same crap.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

DelianSK posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

thelovefist posted...

thelovefist posted...

Squader what is your end-game here? What are you hoping to achieve? Are you hoping to not be evicted and/or go to prison? Are you trying to achieve changes to the legal systems that you're now caught in? I am just trying to see how you've thought things through here.

These people are literally ignorant of the law. It's astounding. As the situation escalates I will come out victorious.

But weren't you evicted? Or as you call it an "understanding" which ends up with you not living there anymore?

they are going to have repercussions for that as well. That being said, this is literally my brain when a cop tells me I don't have the right to get his badge number.


---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

thelovefist posted...

thelovefist posted...

Squader what is your end-game here? What are you hoping to achieve? Are you hoping to not be evicted and/or go to prison? Are you trying to achieve changes to the legal systems that you're now caught in? I am just trying to see how you've thought things through here.

These people are literally ignorant of the law. It's astounding. As the situation escalates I will come out victorious.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

GOATTHlEF posted...

Doc: it's going to take a few minutes to take effect.
*DawkinsNumber4 still going strong ten minutes later*

He's like the fucking terminator walrein

He said in court I was still going at the hospital.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

DelianSK posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

DelianSK posted...

Is court there public? I'm coming for your sentencing.

Is a public court building public, let me think?

You're right. Why would I ask you. You don't know what two party consent means.

I do, but the problem actually is that you don't know what the "expectation of privacy test" is.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

prettyprincess posted...

that is literally semantics and it won't dissuade colloquial usage regardless

it's obvious that tc doesn't feel beholden to the particular phrasing and that the argument (silly as it also is) lies beyond

It is not semantics. "Humans" are not a single species so any time you say "human" and "species" in the same sentence you have to describe the type of species in the same sentence. The only reason we all know what we are talking about when we use it synonymously is because the only type of "human" that still exists is the homo sapiens sapiens and as a result that simple fact makes an inherent understanding of the species that is being defined without having to say so. That is only in certain contexts too. In order to get away with saying "human species" you would have to use it in a sentence such as "He is a human species of the homo sapiens variety" or something weird only an alien or someone in a sci-fi flick should be saying. Either way you have to describe the species of human when it cannot be inferred by default that it is homo sapiens, and this is because "human" details various "species" and not just one single species.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

DelianSK posted...

Is court there public? I'm coming for your sentencing.

Is a public court building public, let me think?
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

DelianSK posted...

DirkDiggles posted...

I wonder what Squaders family thinks about this.

I want to know who has a restraining order against him.

Nobody does.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

lww99 posted...

By that logic, your daughter will follow in your path. Nice.

Her mother told me she got in trouble 2 weeks ago for hitting another kid because the kid said she was wrong.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

DirkDiggles posted...

I wonder what Squaders family thinks about this.

My father is locked up for being insane and my aunt stabbed a girl in the throat when she was young for bullying her. Most others I don't really know well or are dead. What do you think they think? You think this shit started with me? LMAO
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

Xsquadder, youve been arguing semantics for a while now. Are you going to give it up?

I proved that it was not semantics when it was shown that homo erectus and homo sapiens are both considered "humans" and therefore saying "human species" is incorrect because there is no such thing as a "human species" and "human" is more accurately a synonym of the genus of "homo" rather than the synonym of the species homo sapiens.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Forgot what topic I was in.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

I am saying no one other than Hoth does what you claim. I have no alts. This place is not worth my time to make those.

What part of "I may be wrong" are you having trouble understanding?

I understood it, I am clarifying that you are wrong.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

I am saying no one other than Hoth does what you claim. I have no alts. This place is not worth my time to make those.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way. Literally the only person I see doing what you claim is Hoth and you know we are not the same.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.

How? You locked and purged all the topics you posted.

Actually the mods locked them. I have locked not one topic. I actually even got warned for bitching about them (RaptorLC) locking them. I also cannot "purge" topics.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dragonblade01 posted...

"The human species," based on context, could very easily fall under the reason you yourself just recently gave.

Incorrect. The proper terminology would be to say "the species of human" when referencing either a time (which one could infer more ancient hominin or modern homo sapiens sapiens from solely the context) and if speaking in recent past, modern present, or foreseeable future then you can say simply "human". You CANNOT say "human species". Humans are NOT a species they are pretty much a genus put into laymen's terms (similar to Neanderthal). The only reason, again, it is a synonym at all for "homo sapiens sapiens" is because it can be inherently inferred that if talking in a modern context then that MUST be what is referenced but again you don't refer to it as "the human species" just as "human" or "humans".
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Human can refer to the species homo sapiens. It can also refer to the homo genus on occasion. Human itself isn't a scientific term.

but "species" is. All homo sapiens are humans but not all humans are homo sapiens. I think it would be fair to argue that "human" is more closely a synonym of "homo".

In certain usages, yes. But human can also be used to refer specifically to the modern-day homo sapiens species. Both usages exist.

I mean, the best way to solve any misunderstanding is simply to use the scientific terminology as necessary.

That is only due to the fact that nothing else exists that is considered "human" anymore you do realize, correct? So because all homo sapiens are humans then by default one could say "humans" and MUST be referring to homo sapiens (or homo sapiens sapiens) when using a somewhat recent past, present, or future context.

Yes, that's the reason. That doesn't change the fact that it is a proper usage of the word "human."

Not when it is claimed "the human species" which was claimed numerous times. There are species OF human but "human" itself is not an actual species.

For example. Someone says "I'm only human just like everyone else". He is referring to homo sapiens sapiens but says humans but notice the absence of the word "species". It can be inferred that he is referring to homo sapiens sapiens because he is one "just like everyone else" but that doesn't mean that "human" is a species just that when he refers to humans he is referring to a single species based on the timeline.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

Human can refer to the species homo sapiens. It can also refer to the homo genus on occasion. Human itself isn't a scientific term.

but "species" is. All homo sapiens are humans but not all humans are homo sapiens. I think it would be fair to argue that "human" is more closely a synonym of "homo".

In certain usages, yes. But human can also be used to refer specifically to the modern-day homo sapiens species. Both usages exist.

I mean, the best way to solve any misunderstanding is simply to use the scientific terminology as necessary.

That is only due to the fact that nothing else exists that is considered "human" anymore you do realize, correct? So because all homo sapiens are humans then by default one could say "humans" and MUST be referring to homo sapiens (or homo sapiens sapiens) when using a somewhat recent past, present, or future context.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31718336


"Scientists have unearthed the jawbone of what they claim is one of the very first humans.
The 2.8 million-year-old specimen is 400,000 years older than researchers thought that our kind first emerged.
The discovery in Ethiopia suggests climate change spurred the transition from tree dweller to upright walker.
The head of the research team told BBC News that the find gives the first insight into "the most important transitions in human evolution

Prof Brian Villmoare of the University of Nevada in Las Vegas said the discovery makes a clear link between an iconic 3.2 million-year-old hominin (human-like primate) discovered in the same area in 1974, called "Lucy".

Could Lucy's kind - which belonged to the species Australopithecus afarensis - have evolved into the very first primitive humans?
"That's what we are arguing," said Prof Villmoare.
But the fossil record between the time period when Lucy and her kin were alive and the emergence of Homo erectus (with its relatively large brain and humanlike body proportions) two million years ago is sparse."
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Dragonblade01 posted...

Human can refer to the species homo sapiens. It can also refer to the homo genus on occasion. Human itself isn't a scientific term.

but "species" is. All homo sapiens are humans but not all humans are homo sapiens. I think it would be fair to argue that "human" is more closely a synonym of "homo" or is the non-scientific term for the homo genus.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

There are species OF human but human itself is not a species.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-erectus


"Early African Homo erectus fossils (sometimes called Homo ergaster) are the oldest known early humans to have possessed modern human-like body proportions with relatively elongated legs and shorter arms compared to the size of the torso. These features are considered adaptations to a life lived on the ground, indicating the loss of earlier tree-climbing adaptations, with the ability to walk and possibly run long distances. Compared with earlier fossil humans, note the expanded braincase relative to the size of the face. The most complete fossil individual of this species is known as the %u2018Turkana Boy%u2019 %u2013 a well-preserved skeleton (though minus almost all the hand and foot bones), dated around 1.6 million years old. Microscopic study of the teeth indicates that he grew up at a growth rate similar to that of a great ape. There is fossil evidence that this species cared for old and weak individuals. The appearance of Homo erectus in the fossil record is often associated with the earliest handaxes, the first major innovation in stone tool technology."
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

P01ntyDmonspank posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

They are legitimately scientifically classified as "homo sapiens idaltu" and then eventually when the inbreeding and interbreeding with others of the homo genus they became modern homo sapiens sapiens. That's like saying homo sapiens idaltu and homo erectus or homo floresiensis are pretty much the same thing as homo sapiens idaltu or even homo sapiens sapiens.

Except sapiens sapiens and sapiens idaltu are subspecies of the same species while homo sapiens and homo erectus are different species altogether.

Meaningless semantics indeed.

"Except sapiens sapiens and sapiens idaltu are subspecies of the same species while homo sapiens and homo erectus are different species altogether"


And both are considered "human" which is EXACTLY FUCKING WHY YOU CANNOT SAY "HUMAN" IS A SPECIES. I applaud you for making my argument for me.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dawkins, I highly suggest you watch the movie WarGames

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarGames#Influence

This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of Mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play."

You could've won this battle by not fighting it.

I don't watch movies or TV. For good reason. That way I don't go getting ideas from fictional movies.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Conflict posted...

Well, think about the situation you're in because you wanted to file a complaint over the cop making a smartass comment.

Was it worth it?

irrelevant. Also, since it's ongoing and has not reached any conclusion that is not even a question capable of being answered.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Coffeebeanz posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.

Incorrect. In my state a reasonable expectation of privacy is required but do go on showing how much you don't know.

Says the guy likely going to jail.

Incorrect. If it was likely it would have happened already. Anyways, stay on topic and do not deflect when you have no argument or you are wasting my time.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmStatutesText.aspx?article=gcj§ion=10-402&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5

The terms are defined in 10-401.

"(13) (i) “Oral communication” means any conversation or words spoken to or by any person in private conversation."


"private conversation".


Smith Vs. Maryland


http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/442/735.html

"The telephone company, at police request, installed at its central offices a pen register to record the numbers dialed from the telephone at petitioner's home. Prior to his robbery trial, petitioner moved to suppress "all fruits derived from" the pen register. The Maryland trial court denied this motion, holding that the warrantless installation of the pen register did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Petitioner was convicted, and the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed.


"(a) Application of the Fourth Amendment depends on whether the person invoking its protection can claim a "legitimate expectation of privacy" that has been invaded by government action. This inquiry normally embraces two questions: first, whether the individual has exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy; and second, whether his expectation is one that society is prepared to recognize as "reasonable." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 . Pp. 739-741."


When in public or earshot of a location that is openly accessible to the public you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.




The sheriff's office validates my claims over and over in this phone call.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Coffeebeanz posted...

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.

Incorrect. In my state a reasonable expectation of privacy is required but do go on showing how much you don't know.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Conflict posted...

What the real headscratcher is why you initially wanted to file a complaint in the first place. Couldn't have been because of Mikash's blunder because that happened after you started asking for the badge numbers.

Was it because he said "oh, he's recording again"? Or that they were supposedly misinformed about the disturbance when you were following that lady because she flicked you off?

Like, this whole thing could've been so easily avoided in many different ways. I get it; your brain couldn't handle that guy not giving you the proper identifier so you could file a complaint, but even that conundrum could've been sidestepped.

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.




^ Might have been butthurt about that, but that's no excuse to start all future interactions by being a prick from the get go, especially as it relates to Constitutionally protected activity.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Coffeebeanz posted...

TC, are you familiar with the term Pyrrhic Victory? Because that is the absolute best case scenario for you at this point.

This is a battle that shouldn't have been fought, with no real purpose and could've been avoided if had you not decided that semantics made you legally immune from punishment and therefore justified you being an annoying thorn in the side of law enforcement seemingly for no reason.

You escalated a situation and are now using third grade level semantics arguments as a legal defense. That's why you're losing.

It's no different than that annoying kid in elementary school who gets really close to you and screams "I'm not touching you!". It's still obnoxious, and it still gets the kid in trouble, even if technically it's accurate.

You were an obnoxious and obstructionist idiot to law enforcement for no legitimate reason. You were asked to leave in a manner that anyone with basic common sense would've interpreted as an order. Just because you're, to quote Bill Clinton, debating "what the meaning of the word "is" is", doesn't mean you've got a real case - because you don't.

Not specifically, no. Anyways there was no request to leave until after the left officer threatened and the other office invented a disturbance. He has testified to all of this in a separate court hearing and his testimony will be impeached upon during appeals. That being said, you do not understand words, I do, he did not, I do, free to go doesn't mean "you must go" or "you have to go" it means you have the choice to go if you so wish. Illiteracy in America should be consequential to no one but the illiterate themselves as they cannot blame their inability to comprehend their own word usage on those they state them to.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

It's not semantics

This is why you lost your court case

That is a deflection though.

So is "human is not a species its a subspecies"

That's not what I said. You said "human" is a species. Homo is a genus (most of what is considered human are in the homo genus and not necessarily homo sapiens or their derivative sub-species) and I corrected you by explaining that "human" is not a species "homo sapiens" is a species, and "homo sapiens sapiens" is a sub-species. I also clarified by defining the initial homo sapiens which were homo sapiens idaltu. Note that neanderthals were human by definition and so was homo floresiensis and homo erectus but they were NOT homo sapiens or any derivative sub-species.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

P01ntyDmonspank posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

homo sapiens idaltu and homo sapiens sapiens are not the same thing. Simple enough? homo sapiens is the species, and homo sapiens sapiens are the subspecies of homo sapiens idaltu when combined with all of the other hominid mixtures that have arose in the last what 300,000-500,000 years or so?

For all meaningful metrics they are the same thing. They just had minor variations that is distinct from humans who live today.

You're building a semantics argument of no significance

homo sapiens idaltu were the distinct relatives of modern black Africans...Remember why many black Africans have absolutely no neanderthal DNA...

They are legitimately scientifically classified as "homo sapiens idaltu" and then eventually when the inbreeding and interbreeding with others of the homo genus they became modern homo sapiens sapiens. That's like saying homo sapiens idaltu and homo erectus or homo floresiensis are pretty much the same thing as homo sapiens idaltu or even homo sapiens sapiens.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

It's not semantics

This is why you lost your court case

That is a deflection though.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

There is no species called "human".

Playing semantics doesnt help your case.

It's not semantics, I just stick to facts and not shit I pulled out of my ass.


Again, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-does-consciousness-arise/

"The Road to Awareness
But when does the magical journey of consciousness begin? Consciousness requires a sophisticated network of highly interconnected components, nerve cells. Its physical substrate, the thalamo-cortical complex that provides consciousness with its highly elaborate content, begins to be in place between the 24th and 28th week of gestation. Roughly two months later synchrony of the electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythm across both cortical hemispheres signals the onset of global neuronal integration. Thus, many of the circuit elements necessary for consciousness are in place by the third trimester.".


So unless you qualify sperm as a human life then you do not qualify a non-sentient fetus as a human life. If you violate the last statement you are just being a hypocrite and using logic selectively.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

There is no species called "human". We are homo sapiens sapiens, a sub-species of homo sapiens. This isn't rocket science.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

P01ntyDmonspank posted...

Subspecies is a biological grouping meant to inform of minor differences within a species.

Not sure what you're attempting to argue here dawkins. You just seem like a dog turd playing pretend at being a human with a point.

homo sapiens idaltu and homo sapiens sapiens are not the same thing. Simple enough? homo sapiens is the species, and homo sapiens sapiens are the subspecies of homo sapiens idaltu when combined with all of the other hominid mixtures that have arose in the last what 300,000-500,000 years or so?
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

solid_snake666 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Liberals posted...

The benefits of being an actual human. Sorry little shrimp thing, better luck next life.

What species is it then if not human?

What species is sperm? We consider humans to be "intelligent life" and "intelligent life" requires self-awareness (sentience). Just like sperm is not human it is living cells the same is true for a non-sentient fetus.

Actually, humans are define as being a member of the species Homo sapiens, which is what the child is

Incorrect. Humans are a sub-species of homo sapiens (homo sapiens sapiens). Also, humans are not human until they are sentient otherwise "sperm" would also be considered human.

Sperm alone doesn't grow though. Zygotes/Embryos/fetuses are humans on their first stages of development. But liberals are happy to kill them to allow women to be ***** with no consequences.

Incorrect. Sperm are not sentient and neither are fetuses prior to 26-30 weeks (at least generally).



https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-does-consciousness-arise/


"The Road to Awareness
But when does the magical journey of consciousness begin? Consciousness requires a sophisticated network of highly interconnected components, nerve cells. Its physical substrate, the thalamo-cortical complex that provides consciousness with its highly elaborate content, begins to be in place between the 24th and 28th week of gestation. Roughly two months later synchrony of the electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythm across both cortical hemispheres signals the onset of global neuronal integration. Thus, many of the circuit elements necessary for consciousness are in place by the third trimester."
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Conflict posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

DelianSK posted...

Seriously?

Topics (including mine) are getting deleted because DawkinsNumber "doesn't know any better" but yet he gets to keep posting his asinine bullshit.

Is that why he keeps getting warned? *smh* Lying for no reason...

Let's be frank though. This time you got warned for a mom joke

towards a guy who was trolling which made it even more ironic.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Liberals posted...

The benefits of being an actual human. Sorry little shrimp thing, better luck next life.

What species is it then if not human?

What species is sperm? We consider humans to be "intelligent life" and "intelligent life" requires self-awareness (sentience). Just like sperm is not human it is living cells the same is true for a non-sentient fetus.

Actually, humans are define as being a member of the species Homo sapiens, which is what the child is

Incorrect. Humans are a sub-species of homo sapiens (homo sapiens sapiens). Also, humans are not human until they are sentient otherwise "sperm" would also be considered human.

Human is a species, not a state of being. Is someone who is braindead not a human anymore?

Your comparison is also rendered invalid by the fact that a dead man reached the sentience threshold at some point to become a human. In the case of a fetus prior to 26-30 weeks (sometimes later and sometimes slightly sooner) this is not true.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Liberals posted...

The benefits of being an actual human. Sorry little shrimp thing, better luck next life.

What species is it then if not human?

What species is sperm? We consider humans to be "intelligent life" and "intelligent life" requires self-awareness (sentience). Just like sperm is not human it is living cells the same is true for a non-sentient fetus.

Actually, humans are define as being a member of the species Homo sapiens, which is what the child is

Incorrect. Humans are a sub-species of homo sapiens (homo sapiens sapiens). Also, humans are not human until they are sentient otherwise "sperm" would also be considered human.

Human is a species, not a state of being. Is someone who is braindead not a human anymore?

Homo sapiens is a species, homo sapiens sapiens is a sub-species of that in which homo sapiens idaltu and other modern hominin bred to create what we now know of as "humans". That being said, unless you consider sperm human then you have no argument.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Rika_Furude posted...

Liberals posted...

The benefits of being an actual human. Sorry little shrimp thing, better luck next life.

What species is it then if not human?

What species is sperm? We consider humans to be "intelligent life" and "intelligent life" requires self-awareness (sentience). Just like sperm is not human it is living cells the same is true for a non-sentient fetus.

Actually, humans are define as being a member of the species Homo sapiens, which is what the child is

Incorrect. Humans are a sub-species of homo sapiens (homo sapiens sapiens). Also, humans are not human until they are sentient otherwise "sperm" would also be considered human.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Rika_Furude posted...

Liberals posted...

The benefits of being an actual human. Sorry little shrimp thing, better luck next life.

What species is it then if not human?

What species is sperm? We consider humans to be "intelligent life" and "intelligent life" requires self-awareness (sentience). Just like sperm is not human it is living cells the same is true for a non-sentient fetus.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

Sentience does not become possible until around 26-30 weeks so anything before that is not a human, just a collection of living cells.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

evil_zombie11 posted...

I'm not sure why anyone is even taking the time to give advice here. As someone who has worked nights at liquor stores I've seen people like TC many times come in and start problems for no reason, just to be an annoyance and the same thing happens every time the cops are called.

Aka cops come, mentally disordered guy starts problems and acts too tough, cop does the usual SMH and has to arrest the guy who's being annoying.

Cut and dry, basic, easy.

You disproved your credibility right there considering I don't even drink. That being said I am assuming you know English? "Am I being detained OR am I free to go" is two options and two options only. When he said "Free to go" all he said was "You're not being detained" NOT "You have to leave" because if he were saying "You have to leave" that would not be FREE to go that would be "You HAVE to go" or "You MUST go". If you are STILL confused then just look up the definition of the word "free" within this context.

Basically the cop didn't know what the words he was using meant and expected others to misunderstand them as he did.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board

KeyBlade999 posted...

You know you're completely capable of gathering your posts into a single post or two. Not every post you respond to needs it's own separate post. >_>

GameFAQs has a very shitty system in place for quoting posts spanning multiple pages. It really should start loading entire topics at once rather than individual pages. This would allow a better system. It would also use more resources though so I am sure they are likely doing it to cut bandwidth costs.
---

https://soundcloud.com/xsquader - http://youtube.com/xsquader http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1044-independent-politics - Independent Politics Community Board