Lurker > Doe

So the argument of "PS3/4/5 has no games" is it that they truly have no games to play, or they have no games exclusive to the PS5, so the PS5 isn't as essential of a purchase vs just getting a gaming PC?

Pardon my ignorance. I've always been a PlayStation guy, and while I'm not the kind of gamer than has dozens and dozens of game backlogged, I've also never really felt like I had nothing to play.

Does this show have any hidden codes or anything, like gravity falls? Seems like the kind of show that would.

TC is obviously a troll.

I'm more confused about why Doe is arguing so hard to defend/explain the Flat Earther position, when it should otherwise be utterly dismissed.

You can't teach Flat Earthers. We know this, by now, so... What's the point in defending or trying to explain their view point?

EDIT: Basically, Doe apparently got upset with me for saying Flat Earthers have no actual evidence. And, yes, I understand, technically that is wrong.

However, PRACTICALLY... They do not. So, like... What's the point in arguing?

Spoilers: In this day and age, we know there ISN'T value in trying to understand. There isn't value because, no matter what, certain people will ignore literally anything and everything that isn't what they believe. No matter what. We know this.

Again, semantics.

Literally why are you arguing so hard to make sense of the Flat Earther movement?

EDIT: Basically, I can't imagine why you'd be arguing with me so hard about this if you didn't have some kind of stake, so I'm asking what that is, exactly?

"Evidence" means "the available body of facts."

It's not, if said visual evidence can literally change based simply on perception. I feel like this shouldn't even need to be said.

If you can literally change what you can view by, for example, moving a few feet... Then, obviously, said "visual evidence" is fallible.

Context matters, and now I have to question why you appear to be debating this simple fact.

Common sense. If something could only exist because you see it, then the world literally would not exist when you are within your own home, if you're not looking out a window.

However, the act of looking out a window tells you... Yes, the world DOES exist, beyond my home, if I look out the window.

And then, if you step outside, you realize... Yes, the world DOES exist, past what I can see from my window.

Thus, even the most basic of logic tells you that you cannot declare things based SOLELY on what you can see.

That literally is not evidence, though.

Literally what evidence have flat Earthers provided, in comparison? Their feels?

i don't really drama youtube

But those games have their difficulty well balanced and play tested....you know.... which is common since oh I dunno 19 fucking 90 something.
From soft be like "Fuck that, that stuff costs too much time and money ...just let them grind and level to OP levels and sell this flaw as a feature.

This post and the topic title don't match.

Pretty sure there's easy mode mods on the nexus and they don't break the game.

He can just say "I don't want to" when asked about difficulty lol

you can just say you're not interested in making an easy mode instead of opening up a pathway for people to argue about this shit.

if you're on pc and want an easy mode, get a trainer.

"Had we taken that approach, I don't think the game would have done what it did, because the sense of achievement that players gain from overcoming these hurdles is such a fundamental part of the experience. Turning down difficulty would strip the game of that joy - which, in my eyes, would break the game itself."

You can be a blue voter and not vote THIS election. There are people who voted red in 2016 that didn't on 2020, they don't magically become blue voters

Not voting for Biden is voting for Trump.

Yet this doesn't change the fact that only Biden is expected to work for their vote, and if he doesn't, they threaten to "vote" for the candidate that for sure won't do anything for them.

I love how Biden is always expected to work for peoples votes, but you never see these people demanding that Trump work for their votes.

I mean, the morality choices are literally beat you in the face with a shovel obvious. Only things I liked were the lore because I'm an everything lore nerd and the soundtrack.

hamfisted morality tacked on.

What makes a "neckbeard" ?

Undertale is the ultimate neckbeard game

Real low IQ take.

Well, if they get what they want in Trump, I hope the best for them.

Well, which ones are they?