Lurker > Geiki_Ganger

The two party system has been in place for centuries, but the current division that exists is at an all-time high. Even though the country was fully united shortly after 9/11.

What happened after that got us to where we are today?

Fluttershy posted...

If your party wishes to nominate you and the country wants to vote for you, you should be able to run.

what if you're not from that country, naturally?

or it would constitute a third term?

If you have enough people from this country willing to vote for you, why not?

No; I am also against all kinds of qualifiers as to who can be president.

If your party wishes to nominate you and the country wants to vote for you, you should be able to run. Even if you are a 76 year old Mexican who suffers from dementia. That, to me, is true democracy.

ThisUsersAlt posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/55c48bf2.jpg

Biden is only an inch taller than Taylor Swift in real life. This must be a fake and doctored picture.

DarthAragorn posted...

We should all be hoping the Chiefs win instead of that other team with the MAGA moron

Screw that, I'm cheering for the 49ers.

Godfather

emblem-man posted...

Also good to know that the judges have probably already reached a decision before the oral arguments even happen

That's what legal briefs are for. Appeals are not like trials. It is very rare for a judge to be persuaded and change his or her position on something said during oral arguments, because such statements should have already been argued, developed, and fleshed out in the parties' legal briefs.

Ruvan22 posted...

How are health issues "clearly in the province of the states"?

The 10th Amendment.

BearlyWilling posted...

B-b-but states rights! Let the states decide! as they overturn Roe v. Wade

States: ok, were deciding to keep an insurrectionist off the ballot

Supreme Court: No, not like that!

Except abortion relates to health issues, which is clearly in the province of the states.

On the other hand, who can run for president of the USA is undoubtedly an issue that affects the nation.

Amakusa posted...

I think the biggest hurdle was always going to be the part where Trump wasn't charged or convicted of inciting an insurrection. That was always the weak point.

Not really, finding of guilt is not required for 14th amendment purposes.

The main issue has always been whether a state can decide on behalf of the country who can go on a federal presidential ballot, given that the consequence has nationwide consequences.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


No, but it is quite clear from the questions which way the Court is leaning.

Punting everything to Congress is by far the most attractive option, even for the liberal justices.

This should go without saying for guys.

For girls, even the conservative type who say they "want to take it slow" will not automatically rule out having sex if they feel comfortable enough to do so with you. In my view, this is an example of modern women exercising their right to sexual liberalism.

Thoughts?

With good investments, I could probably make close to $10 million in 10 years.

Reporting income is easy if you have a steady job; most high school students can do it.

More difficult part is knowing what deductions are available to you, as this vary greatly from person to person.

D

Huzzah