Criticizing polricirians protecting family wasn't controversial or contrarian before a week ago
I remember PvE being teased by all that story material and tech videos. They... just didn't make it?
Yeah...Im not planning on letting that happen. Not passing her info to the owner. But she still is looking for houses near me.
I told her that the house next to mine was soon going to be put for sale
I can't have an ex as my next door neighbor
Idk looks more like legit wrong number?
Scam usually like "your Amazon account will be suspended unless you reply blah blah"
Imagine she meant for a real store and you say "no I hate you, you smell bad never come again!" Then she goes to store and throws a fit
Well, the LEDs would burn my hands if I tried to unscrew them when they've been on for awhile.
Also, your comparison isn't a great one since touching either type of bulb can lead to burned hands.
I shouldnt have to Show More Options to delete a file
Unless something else comes out the most likely scenario seems to be him being a fringe nevertrump right wing guy.
I hate it here.
Second image almost certainly isn't him, Crooks was 20 while that guy claims to be 26:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bJMR1att4c
And he has vids going back 12 years, where in none does he look like an 8 year old. Mismatch.
Yeah, could've been a sleeper agent going to MAGA rallies and posing as a Republican under Antifa.
From what I'm gathering, there are two people named Thomas Matthew Crooks out there. One is a registered Republican (per voter registrations), and one may or may not be an Antifa member (per his social media), and we have no idea which is which.
Is that the general idea? Because I've seen a flurry of accusations on both sides in the literal minutes since his name was confirmed.
that article doesn't say anything about him being a registered republican. where are the people in that reddit thread getting that from? one person said they "read it" somewhere, but they don't say where.
The person committing the shooting would've been willing to die or risk dying had they been caught since they were outside the perimeter to begin with
I hope you lose CE access so I don't have to read your garbage fire posts again.
We don't know what they saw until more information is provided. We know they saw a person. From that far away, they might not have known they had a gun.
I'm just saying, there have been alot of people saying how law enforcement shouldn't shoot everyone they suspect (this is obviously a good thing!), and now people are acting surprised that they didn't shoot someone suspicious.
Anyone thinking Trump staged someone shooting him in the ear is completely broken. What, he's like "just get me in the ear, just make sure not to fuck up the shot because you'll hit me in the face" as he points and winks at him. Get a grip.
Including you, ranting about it for many posts to overediting one seeming acknowledgement that it might be real, to then shutting up about it entirely, and then pivoting to keeping the door open that Trump or some other party related to him staged a not-fake shooting against him.
The progression of StealTheSheen posts in this thread are quite the mindwarp to read.
I just dont think this will end with the discovery that it was all staged. That might be the one thing that could sink trumps campaign.
If somehow an investigation finds it was staged, i will gladly concede. But immediately calling it staged before anything has come out is not a good thing to do.
It's also possible that law enforcement has learned that they sometimes get in trouble when they just start shooting at people.
The amount of people in the 500 topic about the shooting just immediately claiming it was fake boggled my fucking mind
So are the people who were coming at me and calling me a Trumper for not wanting to spread bullshit conspiracies ready to accept this shooting is not fake?
Feels like the Secret Service was hoping he'd succeed.
They'll just say it was a left winger in disguise, which is already the line of much of the right for January 6th. "It was ANTIFA and Feds framing them"
Its not a smoke trail or bullet time, its debris picked up on its course; human tissue. The camera also likely was a high end camera taking numerous shots per second; its fairly common to have at a big press event. Thats how they get those perfect high quality facial expressions that they like to run with.
Those are my theories that could explain the picture, but I really dont have any investment in this one.
C'mon people, we've had trumpers posing as antifa inciting violence at the BLM rallies. Is it really that farfetched that a leftist could do the same?
Wonder what the motive was then, if it's not what many people immediately assumed.
https://twitter.com/demolitionranch/status/1763936087326560508
How do you get the idea that a youtuber who makes a living shooting silly stuff like lego blocks and watermelons with a .50 cal rifle as "alt-right"?
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/81d1becf.jpg
Yes I posted a link to a tweet of a guy posting a photo in the comments of the original tweet, but he is corrected in the replies to his own tweet and accepts it when told it was a direct link to the NYT site.
Which sources?
Boy I hope you feel a little silly for being so insistent. Did you learn anything?
So yeah that is the real picture used in the NYT page. It's not photoshopped.
You have seen pictures of high speed objects before haven't you?
that is actually what they do.... they just over did it in that one, do you know what exposure time or shutter speed is?
anyway, I'm kinda with #81... militant hostility on any topic is everywhere
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/b/bf6bb22a.jpg