OT > ST > PT
OT > ST > PT
How anyone can have an opinion other than this unless out of sheer defiance is beyond me.
I enjoy 3.
and visually on a level way way beyond 3
OT > ST > PT
How anyone can have an opinion other than this unless out of sheer defiance is beyond me.
I realize the last 1/3 of the newest trilogy isnt out yet, but 2/3 is enough to judge it.
XIII_rocks posted...
and visually on a level way way beyond 3
visually the PT is better than the OT but nobody ever argues that so why do you bring this up
XIII_rocks posted...
and visually on a level way way beyond 3
visually the PT is better than the OT but nobody ever argues that so why do you bring this up
what does ST stand for by the way I cannot figure it out
swordz9 posted...
I realize the last 1/3 of the newest trilogy isnt out yet, but 2/3 is enough to judge it.
Really?
TLJ and TFA are like, fairly well-acted and visually on a level way way beyond 3. TLJ is also a more surprising watch (inevitably since 3 is a prequel) and has better dialogue. It's really not close to me, the ST are just better-made movies. That's before we even get into how badly 3's CGI has aged (like the entire PT) and how all three of the prequels would be utterly ripped to shreds if held to the exacting, precise standards to which TFA and TLJ have been held. Every line of dialogue in those two movies are used as sticks to beat them with, whereas the prequel trilogy, including 3, are drowning in bad lines, bad writing and bad effects at every turn.
None of the movies are particularly well written tbh.
They're absolutely not worse written. Part of the reason the acting is bad in the prequels is because the writing is so bad.
knights of ren
SwiftyDC posted...
knights of ren
Who? I watched both ST movies just a couple days ago, but that doesnt ring any bells. Were they just in some super short/minor scene or some outside material?