Do You Think Trump Will Successfully Overturn Democracy?

Current Events

Page of 7
Current Events » Do You Think Trump Will Successfully Overturn Democracy?
Gladius_ posted...


"Insult a non-voter" He claims to not be from the U.S. so what risk is there? Who are we losing?

People with similar opinions who live in the US.

ssb_yunglink2 posted...
One side in this country is embracing full on fascism and they arent even trying to hide it anymore. If someone is either low-information or ignorant enough to not see that, then insulting them and telling them factual information is valid. Biden is the only option this election.

If someone insults you for not having a strong opinion regarding nazis and then you think Wow theyre mean I HAVE to vote for the nazis now then youre beyond help.

I don't think that's guaranteed. As long as someone doesn't explictly support fascism I think they can be salvaged. I don't have the luxury to just write off votes and there is no loss in attempting to court them.

mybbqrules posted...
the question we already know you won't answer

Because it's not relevant. On the day CE closed this was the only account I was using.
~ DH ~
Gladius_ posted...
Any one of these on their own? Sure. But let's be reasonable and realistic here.

Very well put.

Honestly the Kanye thing was enough of a giveaway that everything else is just the cherry on top.
https://i.ibb.co/2vRbyC0/Rosa-6.png
"Friends don't let friends watch The Big Bang Theory" - mogar002
Always nice to see the REAL main event of a WWE PPV... a gladius smackdown.
Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
Post #254 was unavailable or deleted.
Diceheist posted...
Because it's not relevant. On the day CE closed this was the only account I was using.
Hey everyone, the sus low karma alt isn't fessing to who their main is because it's "not relevant".

Quick, everyone look surprised!
Currently playing: Jurassic Word Evo 2, Fortnite STW, WoW, Punch-Out, Super Punch-Out
Convicted criminal Donald Trump: Inmate No. P01135809
Gladius_ posted...
uses the conservative lingo of calling the left "A cult."

I do see people on the left call people who support Trump 'cultists' too so this one inherently doesn't set me off thinking someone is one way or the other. However the rest of your post seems pretty on point. =P
I'm a long, long way from giving up
Call me old-fashioned, call me a fool
Post #257 was unavailable or deleted.
Gladius_ posted...
Wasn't aggressive I even actively gave him the benefit of doubt and ultimately I was right.

You weren't explictly hostile but you still undermined the fact that he was insulted for his political views first. You then further dismissed that point saying, "I don't care what the guy he responded to said, as the larger danger here is right-wing misinformation.", even though the original guy insulting him is important to the context of why he started calling people cultists.

I'm not making any argument that he is or isn't what he's being accused of, just that he's justified in insulting others when he was insulted first.

Gladius_ posted...
I'm more patient with real people and I'm actively known for my patience but I'm not so patient with sock puppets. Which he undoubtedly is. As I outlined in post 250.

Problem is there are more eyes on the internet. The amount of people willing to discuss politics in real life in public is lower than the amount of people reading forums.

Gladius_ posted...
What gave it away for me was his insistence people vote third party and getting really annoyed that people took issue with that answer.

That just seems like premature conclusion making. If I believe for example both candidates support a nation committing war crimes and that it's morally reprehensible for me to be complicit in that, someone popping up to assert that I'm actually the bad guy is obviously gonna piss me off.

Once I've been personally insulted for my views yeah I'm gonna get incredibly aggressive about them. I just don't think it's reasonable to hold natural responses against someone's credibility.

The other the issues you raised about him are a seperate matter. I don't have any explicit opposition to them.
~ DH ~
Error1355 posted...
I do see people on the left call people who support Trump 'cultists' too so this one inherently doesn't set me off thinking someone is one way or the other. However the rest of your post seems pretty on point. =P

That's because there's a literal cult of personality built around Trump. The crazier ones have even literally substituted Jesus for him as their god/savior and depicted him in a religious manner either through painted artworks or statutes at Republican events. They let him say both sides of the issue and accept he's right on both. They let him do the thinking for them. He lied a historic amount of times during his presidency and yet they will deny it/says he only tells the truth or as it is, claim it's not what he really meant, or claim it's not a big deal. They will commit violent crimes in this name, to the extent of even trying to overthrow an election in order to install him as some sort of King. Trump and his cultists are literally like any other religious cult built around a figure they think is infallible and there to save them. So many people have made the comparisons that it's impossible to ignore.

There is no Biden equivalent to this. It's similar to how when right-wingers claim we're only calling them fascists/Nazis because they've spent decades referring to everything to the left of the Nazis as "communism/socialism", when, no, we're calling you that because you're putting forth and claiming you want very Christo-fascist ideals and are at the point where you're marching with literal Neo Nazis and the leading candidate for POTUS can't stop referencing Nazi ideals, terminology, and has even praised Hitler and his generals in the past.
My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use)
Gladius_ posted...
and the most obvious and reasonable answer is usually correct.
Good'ole Occam's Razor
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Gladius_ posted...
it's rare for someone on the left to consider others on the left of being a cult

To be fair Hillary supporters did it to Bernie supporters all the time.

After years of being called a "Bernie Bro" just because I preferred him over Hillary based on their voting records and the fact that Bernie polled better against the Republicans I've kinda lost patience for hostile Democrats.
~ DH ~
Post #262 was unavailable or deleted.
Diceheist posted...
To be fair Hillary supporters did it to Bernie supporters all the time.

After years of being called a "Bernie Bro" just because I preferred him over Hillary based on their voting records and the fact that Bernie polled better against the Republicans I've kinda lost patience for hostile Democrats.
Bernie bros were an actual thing and still exist though

I havent seen supporters of any democrat but Bernie create such intricate theories about how Bernie would win against all odds or insisting that he shouldve been the nominee. People still do this shit in 2024.

Nobody does that for Biden. He just demonstrably does not have a cult.
Hee Ho
Gladius_ posted...
Sure but I'd bet you'd respond differently.

Eh, I'm not on a low karma account for my upstanding citizenry. I can only commit to civility on this subject because I'm a third-party to the original discussion. >_>

But if you mean that I wouldn't respond with generic alt-right NPC esque responses then yeah that's true.

ssb_yunglink2 posted...

Bernie bros were an actual thing and still exist though

I havent seen supporters of any democrat but Bernie create such intricate theories about how Bernie would win against all odds or insisting that he shouldve been the nominee. People still do this shit in 2024.

Nobody does that for Biden. He just demonstrably does not have a cult.

Biden supporters constantly claimed he was the only candidate who could beat Trump in 2020 (even though the polling said multiple candidates could), would've beat Hillary in the 2016 primary if he ran (even though he explictly said he couldn't, polling also said he couldn't, and the whole way he won the 2020 primary would've been nigh impossible to pull off against Hillary), is comfortably beating Trump right now even though poll after poll shows him losing in the swing states that historically decide elections, that people are Trumpers if they call out any eccentricities of Biden's speech/conduct, and so on and so forth.

It's just hard to see because you haven't been arguing with them.
~ DH ~
[deleted]
Post #266 was unavailable or deleted.
Diceheist posted...
Eh, I'm not on a low karma account for my upstanding citizenry. I can only commit to civility on this subject because I'm a third-party to the original discussion. >_>

But if you mean that I wouldn't respond with generic alt-right NPC esque responses then yeah that's true.

Biden supporters constantly claimed he was the only candidate who could beat Trump (even though the polling said multiple candidates could), would've beat Hillary in the 2016 primary if he ran (even though he explictly said he couldn't, polling also said he couldn't, and the whole way he won the 2020 primary would've been nigh impossible to pull off against Hillary), is comfortably beating Trump right now even though poll after poll shows him losing in the swing states that historically decide elections, that people are Trumpers if they call out any eccentricities of Biden's speech/conduct, and so on and so forth.

It's just hard to see because you haven't been arguing with them.
Ive never seen a single person argue that Biden shouldve been the 2016 nominee. Nobody actually likes Biden because hes Biden despite him being an above average president overall. I dont know where these people are that are claiming that Biden is some super candidate but i sure as hell have not seen them.

And what other candidate shouldve replaced Biden for this election? Its factual that no other candidate has a better chance than Biden right now.
Hee Ho
ssb_yunglink2 posted...
And what other candidate shouldve replaced Biden for this election? Its factual that no other candidate has a better chance than Biden right now.
Biden himself has stated that there are a few others that could defeat Trump as well. They know what's at stake though and will just wait for the next election to contend for the party nomination, also noting that switching when a 2nd term was possible for Biden only makes the party look weaker. I think that's part of why the GOP kept prodding Gavin Newsom about running for President (to create more division).
'Just sitting around the house tonight w my dog. Felt like I should be doing something important, but couldn't put my finger on it.' - Phil Kessel on USA snub
Post #269 was unavailable or deleted.
HeeathLivesOn posted...
Biden himself has stated that there are a few others that could defeat Trump as well. They know what's at stake though and will just wait for the next election to contend for the party nomination, also noting that switching when a 2nd term was possible for Biden only makes the party look weaker. I think that's part of why the GOP kept prodding Gavin Newsom about running for President (to create more division).
realistically who else would have a better chance than Biden right now though

Hee Ho
ssb_yunglink2 posted...
realistically who else would have a better chance than Biden right now though

My bet is Whitmer will be a contender for the nomination. Pritzker is also a contender. No one else really has a legitimate shot.
This rant was brought to you by your local random thinker.
I'm as Canadian as Wayne Gretzky crashing a snowmobile into a moose. - JIC X
Xenogears15 posted...
My bet is Whitmer will be a contender for the nomination. Pritzker is also a contender. No one else really has a legitimate shot.

I dunno, I feel like Newsom could sell himself well. He's especially got the fire of wanting to take on right-wing propaganda and those who propagate it, which a lot of people sorely wish to see more of the Dem party do, instead of just standing by and letting them yap their shit unchallenged because that's "the high/adult road".

He's also good-looking, or so I hear, and comes from the state of CA, known as being one of the more progressive states in the Union.

He definitely has his issues though and I think there's other candidates with less baggage, just saying, I feel like the Dem party apparatus may try to make him the next big thing. On an anecdotal level, listening to progressive radio programming he's the name I've heard dropped most when asked for alternatives to Biden.
My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use)
Xenogears15 posted...
My bet is Whitmer will be a contender for the nomination. Pritzker is also a contender. No one else really has a legitimate shot.

EDIT: whoops, I thought you meant for 2028. My bad.
nah youre good. I dont disagree with Whitmer for 2028.

I just dont think any candidate would do better than Biden if they stepped in right now for 2024
Hee Ho
Post #274 was unavailable or deleted.
ssb_yunglink2 posted...

Ive never seen a single person argue that Biden shouldve been the 2016 nominee. Nobody actually likes Biden because hes Biden despite him being an above average president overall. I dont know where these people are that are claiming that Biden is some super candidate but i sure as hell have not seen them.

They were everywhere in 2020. You don't win the nomination without supporters lol.

ssb_yunglink2 posted...
And what other candidate shouldve replaced Biden for this election? Its factual that no other candidate has a better chance than Biden right now.

Not referring to 2024, obviously it's hard to swap out an incumbent president.

Gladius_ posted...


Some people really underestimate the potential Newsom pick. He may not be my ideal choice but he can debate and easily defend himself. He's also very good at putting republican politicans in a corner leaving them stammering about what to say or do. His strongest debate tactic is putting them in a position where no matter what they say they are shooting themselves in the foot. I respect that. Lol

Problem is if you tell a disaffected non-voting progressive that they gotta vote for Biden now and then in return they can get.. Gavin fucking Newsom in 2028, that is really not gonna assauge their fear of stagnation or motivate them to get onboard. >_>

I'd literally prefer Harris from a policy perspective. Dude might make me go KHive lol.
~ DH ~
I'd be content with Newsom 2028 but I can't deny that since politics ebbs and flows we're likely to get a Republican after Biden leaves.

I hope they're passed the MAGA cult phase but they haven't been since 2016 so why start then
https://i.ibb.co/2vRbyC0/Rosa-6.png
"Friends don't let friends watch The Big Bang Theory" - mogar002
Post #277 was unavailable or deleted.
https://youtu.be/KtwvUhiaXu4?si=d_4TABPS9eCoJIk4

Video is 3 min, but I think he accurately breaks down those who claim "things were better under Trump" or keep moving the goalposts on things never being good enough under Biden despite passing so many progressive agendas.
God I hope you're right. Everything makes sense when you put it that way, especially given there are MAGA defectors like Pence. Who while still full of shit just aren't playing to Trump's good side anymore.

Unfortunately complicity in death threats is the floor for that but what can you do?
https://i.ibb.co/2vRbyC0/Rosa-6.png
"Friends don't let friends watch The Big Bang Theory" - mogar002
Cemith posted...
I'd be content with Newsom 2028 but I can't deny that since politics ebbs and flows we're likely to get a Republican after Biden leaves.

Republicans are on the verge of implosion and desperately need to win this election. Their biggest problem is that if Trump goes to prison, there's a whole lot of other co-conspirators that'll follow. Never forget that on top of 30+ Republican Congressmen being involved in the insurrection directly via text/email/etc, the majority of Republican Congressmen aided in trying to fraudulently overturn the election. The only thing stopping us from trying them right now is getting the lynchpin first.

Combine that with other factors like runaway extremism as they can't keep their party under reasonable control, RNC bleeding money, massive infighting, etc, and you can see why they have no choice but to go all in here.
'Just sitting around the house tonight w my dog. Felt like I should be doing something important, but couldn't put my finger on it.' - Phil Kessel on USA snub
^I honestly don't see Trump going to jail, as much as I'd love to see him there.

Best case scenario he gets glorified house arrest, and that's a best case scenario.

That said, Trump losing 2024 just finally may give Republicans a wake up call to finally drop Trump. .....then again, I thought they had an easy out Jan 6th and yet here we are. So idk anymore.
Kradek posted...
I dunno, I feel like Newsom could sell himself well. He's especially got the fire of wanting to take on right-wing propaganda and those who propagate it, which a lot of people sorely wish to see more of the Dem party do, instead of just standing by and letting them yap their shit unchallenged because that's "the high/adult road".

He's also good-looking, or so I hear, and comes from the state of CA, known as being one of the more progressive states in the Union.

He definitely has his issues though and I think there's other candidates with less baggage, just saying, I feel like the Dem party apparatus may try to make him the next big thing. On an anecdotal level, listening to progressive radio programming he's the name I've heard dropped most when asked for alternatives to Biden.

Let me rephrase: I meant that other than Newsom there are only two contenders: Whitmer and Pritzker. Newsom is very much the favorite at this point.
This rant was brought to you by your local random thinker.
I'm as Canadian as Wayne Gretzky crashing a snowmobile into a moose. - JIC X
Xenogears15 posted...
Let me rephrase: I meant that other than Newsom there are only two contenders: Whitmer and Pritzker. Newsom is very much the favorite at this point.
I've said for like 2 years now that a Whitmer/Newsom ticket with either being P or VP would be a money ticket.

Both are extremely popular and have helped their states become Democrat strongholds. People forget that literal Arnold Schwarzenegger was a two term governor of California and that cities were going bankrupt under him until Brown took over, then Newsom took over for Brown, and California became a more valuable state every year after.

People also don't seem to understand that California is the biggest tech state, biggest agriculture state, and most populous state in the country. There's a myriad of issues that the state must face and Newsom has mostly done a good job balancing the needs of appeasing businesses so more open and create more jobs, appeasing the farmers, so they can continue growing for the nations food supply, and the people, so ensure that injustices are avoided, and people can live a moderately decent life. It's a tough job and the only job in the country that could come close to preparing you to be President.

Take Florida, DeSantis does nothing for anyone besides Republicans. Nothing about his policies would work on a national level, that's why he got absolutely decimated on the national stage by Nikki fucking Haley. She sucks too, but she didn't play the fascism card nearly as much as Ronald. The simple fact is, Americans aren't solely Republicans, we don't want some fuckwad throwing his weight around forcing his virtues on us. Newsom isn't that type of governor, as obvious by how people react to him being mentioned as the future of the party.
lolAmerica
In any primary the Harris campaign is gonna be unloading on Newsom's record and all he really has to fight back with are her previous stances on weed and truancy. After the onslaught from her and whichever actual progressive candidate runs he's going to be a significantly weakened candidate and probably down to Hillary/Biden levels of unpopularity, even if he still wins the primary.

The dude isn't Biden so he won't have the Obama presidency nostalgia or moderate boomer vote to help him brush off scrutiny. If the guy had a good a record he'd be a great choice for his general image and charisma, but we're far past the point where those are the only things that matter.
~ DH ~
What's his record? You can't claim that California is the most liberal state and a monument of how America should look, then trash the governor.
lolAmerica
ClayGuida posted...
What's his record? You can't claim that California is the most liberal state and a monument of how America should look, then trash the governor.

Sure wasn't me who said that, but yeah Newsom has made some good decisions, considering it's hard to fail when you have a Democratic supermajority. Yet he's quite often overriden that majority to make needlessly bad ones (presumably to protect his image for future national elections). This is a list of good Democratic legislation Newsom vetoed because sometimes progress has to take a backseat to ambition:

https://www.kqed.org/news/11963514/labor-rights-ice-and-self-driving-trucks-the-biggest-bills-vetoed-by-newsom-so-far

Bills for insulin caps, protection for trans kids, opposition to caste discrimination, leverage for workers on strike, etc. vetoed by Newsom and that's not even all the examples. And then his close ties to various corporations adds even more of a question mark to his intentions. People are tired of politicians who put their careers and donors ahead of the people and while Newsom is one of least problematic examples of one that's probably just because you have to be some level of decently liberal to be governor of California.

By contrast in the 2019 primary Harris never presented herself as any roadblock to progress, she generally embraced as much progressivism as a mainstream Democrat was allowed to, and that's why she had barely any conflict with Bernie compared to the other major candidates. She can legitimately probably hit him from the left, which is not good for him when she's also gonna be competitive for establishment support and he previously boxed himself in by saying he'd never run against her.
~ DH ~
LOL at this topic. I had a hair trigger vs. one right wing clown who proceeded to prove my guess right in dozens of follow up posts, and than a defender of that first clown shows up whining about "aggressive hostility etc." and mostly keeps his mask on here, only to display a remarkable knowledge of GOP Clinton email talking points in a different topic.

All these right wingers do is play games, and they are so damn bad at it.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984
KajeI posted...
That's cool and all, but do you think Joe Biden fairly won the 2020 election?


no
if your electric car runs out of juice do you walk to the charging station for a jerry can of electricity?
2546
Mad_Cow46 posted...
no

embarrassing
PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80
Last game(s) finished: Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice (XSX), Gears of War 3 (X360)
EPR-radar posted...
LOL at this topic. I had a hair trigger vs. one right wing clown who proceeded to prove my guess right in dozens of follow up posts, and than a defender of that first clown shows up whining about "aggressive hostility etc." and mostly keeps his mask on here, only to display a remarkable knowledge of GOP Clinton email talking points in a different topic.

All these right wingers do is play games, and they are so damn bad at it.

Well at least you acknowledge it was hair trigger.

Anyway facts aren't talking points. It's a fact that federal officials aren't supposed to keep professional emails on a private server or delete them en masse. I didn't say anything more than that these were pointless errors that could've been avoided in favor of saving her presidential campaign.
~ DH ~
Diceheist posted...
Sure wasn't me who said that, but yeah Newsom has made some good decisions, considering it's hard to fail when you have a Democratic supermajority. Yet he's quite often overriden that majority to make needlessly bad ones (presumably to protect his image for future national elections). This is a list of good Democratic legislation Newsom vetoed because sometimes progress has to take a backseat to ambition:

https://www.kqed.org/news/11963514/labor-rights-ice-and-self-driving-trucks-the-biggest-bills-vetoed-by-newsom-so-far

Bills for insulin caps, protection for trans kids, opposition to caste discrimination, leverage for workers on strike, etc. vetoed by Newsom and that's not even all the examples. And then his close ties to various corporations adds even more of a question mark to his intentions. People are tired of politicians who put their careers and donors ahead of the people and while Newsom is one of least problematic examples of one that's probably just because you have to be some level of decently liberal to be governor of California.

By contrast in the 2019 primary Harris never presented herself as any roadblock to progress, she generally embraced as much progressivism as a mainstream Democrat was allowed to, and that's why she had barely any conflict with Bernie compared to the other major candidates. She can legitimately probably hit him from the left, which is not good for him when she's also gonna be competitive for establishment support and he previously boxed himself in by saying he'd never run against her.

Iirc a majority of things he vetoed was either because they were written too vague, they were already laws that were being enforced, or they were just outright dumb things.

I haven't read the list in a while but I remember reading through the explanations as they were vetoed and most had a valid reason for being vetoed.

I remember two of the bills were specifically about discrimination against two different groups of people that was already covered in their already on the books discrimination laws.
lolAmerica
Mad_Cow46 posted...
no

Sure must suck to live in a cult bubble.
My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use)
Kradek posted...
Sure must suck to live in a cult bubble.

Yeah that's fucking embarrassing. 2024 and bro still thinks the election is stolen.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FjYyIKkRvUU&pp=ygUZTGV0dGVya2VubnkgZW1iYXJyYXNzaW5nIA%3D%3D
https://i.ibb.co/2vRbyC0/Rosa-6.png
"Friends don't let friends watch The Big Bang Theory" - mogar002
Mad_Cow46 posted...
no
Why?
Look, I can name a few instances in MY life where I tried to reach mutual understanding
and i can TELL you, always faster and easier to just kill em. Just is!
Mad_Cow46 posted...
no
Appreciate you making it easy to not take you seriously
Mad_Cow46 posted...
That's cool and all, but do you think Joe Biden fairly won the 2020 election?

no

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/4c299402.jpg

Rage is a hell of an anesthetic.
Mad_Cow46 posted...
no
@Mad_Cow46 is a Trumper chud who believes the fake voter fraud nonsense?
BunkerBoy posted...
@Mad_Cow46 is a Trumper chud who believes the fake voter fraud nonsense?
Correct, but he won't admit to 90% of what he believes for fear of getting moderated.
This signature is not political.
Normally Mad_Cow46 sticks to the Hell Hole board.
This signature is not political.
Has anyone told Trump_Cow to fuck off yet? If not, someone should definitely tell that idiot to fuck off.
Are we the baddies?
Current Events » Do You Think Trump Will Successfully Overturn Democracy?
Page of 7