Something something wokeWas going to post this verbatim...
Girl Scouts still exists as a gender exclusive organization.
Girl Scouts still exists as a gender exclusive organization. They should've just kept the Boy Scouts exclusive too.
Girl Scouts still exists as a gender exclusive organization. They should've just kept the Boy Scouts exclusive too.
Honestly I have been saying they should do this for a while. Really it shouldn't be gender exclusive.
Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts are entirely separate organizations, which people really did not want to understand last time this topic came up here.I get that. Its easy to assume they are part of the same origination but they are not.
Scouting America... For Pedophiles?Boy scouts has always had a paedophilia problem. Sometimes even with proper vetting some sickos are going to slip though. This will not make the problem worse than it already is. Catching and punishing those monsters is still a priority.
Girl Scouts still exists as a gender exclusive organization. They should've just kept the Boy Scouts exclusive too.
This. Honestly they just need to combine the two. No sense in having one gender exclusive but not the other.
Edit: Lmao, had to see the comments. Exactly as expectedblue checkmarks always give them away
Ideally it would have been a requirement to have 2 adults required at any event.
The comments are going roughly as expected.how are you even posting here?
Not seeing an issue here.
Girl scouts was better anyway.
It's not like boys need guidance or people to care about them in real life.
Today, I do recognize that there is value in having spaces to foster healthy male bonding, so I can understand the disappointment in losing Boy Scouts as that sort of venue, especially for boys who don't gravitate for sports.
If anything this rebrand is to distance themselves from the Boyscouts problems with sexual predator that they've covered up.Good point