Is it reasonable to ask for things in the nine months before the next administration begins?
Not even accurate. The number of dead Palestinians is the same on the biden track. The reason is that israel's goal is to completely take over Palestinian land 100% no matter what. Regardless, this is a false dichotomy, unless you want to argue that biden just *has to* support genocide. Would be interested in hearing why you think that is the case.
Not even accurate. The number of dead Palestinians is the same on the biden track. The reason is that israel's goal is to completely take over Palestinian land 100% no matter what. Regardless, this is a false dichotomy, unless you want to argue that biden just *has to* support genocide. Would be interested in hearing why you think that is the case.Eh, idk about this. Trump literally came out and told Israel to finish them off already. I think if he was president, things would be a little more agressive
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a2757ded.jpgFor added accuracy, add dead trans people, dead Ukrainians, dead miscarrying women, acceleration of climate change, dismantling of the democratic process, etc. after the dead Palestinians.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/1ccpeea/are_you_sure_refusing_to_vote_in_november_will/
Eh, idk about this. Trump literally came out and told Israel to finish them off already. I think if he was president, things would be a little more agressiveThen you could claim that the trolley moves faster on the trump track, but the number of dead Palestinians would be the same.
Not even accurate. The number of dead Palestinians is the same on the biden track. The reason is that israel's goal is to completely take over Palestinian land 100% no matter what. Regardless, this is a false dichotomy, unless you want to argue that biden just *has to* support genocide. Would be interested in hearing why you think that is the case.Not really. Republicans have openly flouted just nuking gaza.
Not even accurate. The number of dead Palestinians is the same on the biden track. The reason is that israel's goal is to completely take over Palestinian land 100% no matter what. Regardless, this is a false dichotomy, unless you want to argue that biden just *has to* support genocide. Would be interested in hearing why you think that is the caseThe point is that Biden and Trump is that
Dunno why liberals have given up on demanding Biden to stop funding a genocide
I'm sorry. I couldn't pull that switch. Either way, I kill somebody.
Dunno why liberals have given up on demanding Biden to stop funding a genocide. Like sure vote for him whatever but man, "the other guy will genocide harder" isn't the shining endorsement you think it is lol this country is sick.
Dunno why liberals have given up on demanding Biden to stop funding a genocide. Like sure vote for him whatever but man, "the other guy will genocide harder" isn't the shining endorsement you think it is lol this country is sick.
WingsOfGood posted... When did they stop demanding? The point of the picture is infact about voting
yet you say "sure vote for him"
so what is the issue?
Eh, idk about this. Trump literally came out and told Israel to finish them off already. I think if he was president, things would be a little more agressiveYou're talking to someone who is trying to argue Biden just as bad as Trump on all regards.
I'm sorry. I couldn't pull that switch. Either way, I kill somebody.
Not really. Republicans have openly flouted just nuking gaza.Stupid republicans can talk about that all they want, but that would never happen, not only because of the geopolitical ramifications, but also because israel is right there and would be eating the fallout so they wouldn't allow it. Even if the blast and fallout could be entirely contained within Gaza, they wouldn't allow it because israel wants that land for themselves.
The point is that Biden and Trump is that
Replubcians ads Hard line pro Israel. They do not care about anything in the Middle East.
Where as Dems softly support Israel. But they do listen to criticism about Israel and do believe in two state land policy.
Remember Bibi wants replubcian to win because there will be no criticism towards from the USA.
Strange response considering you just mentioned rioting and burning down cities in another topic, which would most likely lead to death(s).
Rioting is a non-violent response.
You need to learn what words mean. And setting cities on fire could easily result in loss of life.
I don't disagree that cops suck, but your morality seems fairly situational.
Stupid republicans can talk about that all they want, but that would never happen, not only because of the geopolitical ramifications, but also because israel is right there and would be eating the fallout so they wouldn't allow it. Even if the blast and fallout could be entirely contained within Gaza, they wouldn't allow it because israel wants that land for themselves.lmfao, anything to defend Republicans, as per usual.
I wouldn't call this "soft support": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86Nrv5izaTs
The two state proposal is a carrot hung in front of Palestinians that will never actually be given to them. It's a delay and pacify tactic that doubles as a cover for all the actions that the US takes directly against that goal, so they can claim "we tried!!" It's complete bullshit and it's strange that anyone believes the US is sincere in this stance.
I don't mean setting an arson fire and letting it spread where it may. Not that I can blame you, given how it was worded, and the fact that text doesn't convey tone, but I think you're taking that statement a bit too literal.
<_<
lmfao, anything to defend Republicans, as per usual.What the hell are you talking about?
What the hell are you talking about?Republicans didn't actually mean that, and if they did, who cares, it'd never happen anyway, but let's get back to the evil demonrats!
Republicans didn't actually mean that, and if they did, who cares, it'd never happen anyway, but let's get back to the evil demonrats!I didn't say that. The stupid republicans who said that definitely meant it, but reality prevents it. There are layers between them and the actual launching of nukes. Even the president has layers between himself and the actual launching of nukes. Also, since they're such rabid supporters of israel, israel themselves who instruct them not to nuke because, again, israel is right there and would get hit with fallout. I know you have a script in your mind about how all conversations go on the internet, but please read my post and respond to it instead of substituting in your own strawman.
People are putting a lot of effort into trying to shame people who say they don't want to play "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" with genocide and ignoring thatThere's a long list of people to blame if Trump wins including the people who didn't vote.
35% of voting age population didn't vote in 2020, some portion of which just didn't care to
30% of voting age population just voted directly for Trump
If Biden loses in the fall, there's a long list of people to blame before we get to "People who aren't okay with genocide".
Using the TCs trolley example, Switch 1 kills 1 person, Switch 2 kills 5 people. No matter the virtue signalling done to make one's self feel better, regardless people are going to die under the trolley scenario. You aren't a good or better person letting 5 die instead of 1 because you didn't want to choose.
Okay let me give you a trolley problem.5 people dying vs 1 person dying.
You're on a call with a person who is in the trolley problem. They say they morally would be opposed to flipping the switch for [trolley problem reasons], but they will flip it if you pay them $100. Do you do it?
I'm choosing to save the 5.
So you would pay the $100 right?So you can't read?
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/ebce6148.jpg
So you can't read?
I said I would save the 5 people. You do the simple math.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/ebce6148.jpg