ACAB, and yes, I mean your fictional white dude, too
ACAB is such a ridiculous stance to take when people actually mean it.
ACAB is such a ridiculous stance to take when people actually mean it.Ever see "Team America: World Police"?
obv, that was kind of a weird joke-ish type thing, but I literally do mean it, tho, with zero exceptions.
Ever see "Team America: World Police"?
Then your stance is idiotic.
Yes. What of it?You need bastards to fuck the assholes.
It's literally not, and the fact that you think so means you know nothing.
Even under the best of circumstances - a "good cop" is covering for a shit ton of bad cops, whether they mean to or not. It's just statistics. You could say there would have to be SOME EXCEPTIONS, but that's no more worth mentioning than any other except, many of which, I'm sure YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO IGNORE.
Funny, when I worked as a cop, I never covered for anybody. But I guess evidence of corrupt police, which Im not denying exist in large quantities, makes it alright to just generalise about a massive group of people in your book?
Were you actively exposing the corruption within your department? Cuz, if not, you were covering for them.
Were you actively exposing the corruption within your department? Cuz, if not, you were covering for them.
Did you give your money to children in Africa this week? Because if not you were starving them.
Funny, when I worked as a cop, I never covered for anybody.There's reasons why anecdotal evidence isn't considered good evidence.
But I guess evidence of corrupt police, which Im not denying exist in large quantities, makes it alright to just generalize about a massive group of people in your book?It's fine to generalize about unintrinsic adjectives. Trump supporters are bad people. No one is born a Trump supporter.
There's reasons why anecdotal evidence isn't considered good evidence.Its fine when youre arguing against somebody making an absolute claim. You only need one example of them being wrong for their claim to be incorrect.
Its fine when youre arguing against somebody making an absolute claim. You only need one example of them being wrong for their claim to be incorrect.It's more nuanced than just being an absolute claim.
1 usually offensive : a child born to parents who are not married to each otherRight off the bat the first definition has to have a message on how bastard is usually offensive and another message that historically it wasn't offensive.
NOTE: This sense of bastard has not always been offensive. In fact, it was a relatively neutral term until as recently as the late 20th century, when it began to take on its offensive status. This shift coincided with a positive change in societal attitudes towards unmarried parents and a lessening of the social stigma of having children outside of marriage. The word bastard is still used relatively neutrally in historical references and historical fiction, but is usually considered offensive when used in present-day contexts to describe a child born to parents not married to each other.
2: something that is spurious (see SPURIOUS sense 3a), irregular, inferior, or of questionable originThe note is just about objects and the definition starts "something that". I doubt this is what people mean in the phrase but I could see it.
3 a: an offensive or disagreeable person used as a generalized term of abuseCops should be offensive and disagreeable to some degree.
b: MAN, FELLOWIt's also a compliment. Team America World Police took another word that's an insult as a good thing as well.
the nicest thing an Aussie can call you is a bloody fine bastard.
Wilson Hicks
It's more nuanced than just being an absolute claim.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bastard
Right off the bat the first definition has to have a message on how bastard is usually offensive and another message that historically it wasn't offensive.
It's not literally saying all cops have parents not married to each other so on to definition 2.
The note is just about objects and the definition starts "something that". I doubt this is what people mean in the phrase but I could see it.
Cops should be offensive and disagreeable to some degree.
It's also a compliment. Team America World Police took another word that's an insult as a good thing as well.
Raccoon lives matterGot nuked off the map.
What happened to them all anyways?
People who claim all cops are bastards arent doing so as a term of endearment.Glob posted...
Its fine when youre arguing against somebody making an absolute claim. You only need one example of them being wrong for their claim to be incorrect.Which quote do you want to rescind?
Which quote do you want to rescind?
Youre really not as good at this as you think you are.Irony.
The first quote is clearly a generalisation (and a fair one) but does not use any language which suggests an absolute claim.So you believe someone has used ACAB as a compliment?
Once again, youre being facetious and the reason that youre doing it is because you have nothing of value of value to say.Believe whatever you want.
That they were including Leon S. Kennedy when they said that?Leon is a beautiful cat?
So, is the phrase moddable or what? One of my messages months ago was modded that contained the acronym and got upheld because I was "Inciting violence"Everything can be mental gymnasticed into abusive, offensive, or trolling.
Nemesis was rightOh, yeah. All the STARS members were cops too.
I just wanted to make a silly little topic about Leon S. Kennedy from the Resident Evil franchise. (._. )It's okay friendo. Your intentions were too pure for this world.
I just wanted to make a silly little topic about Leon S. Kennedy from the Resident Evil franchise. (._. )
You need bastards to fuck the assholes.The WMDs TA:WP was so concerned about were already proven not to exist before the movie came out.
is special agent dana scully AB