yes
first season is pretty good but ends weakly, and the inter-character dynamics are kinda lameThese.
second season is almost unwatchably bad
third season is one of the best seasons of a cartoon ever. it's on par with book 2 of TLA
fourth season sucks but not as bad as s2
It's better if you watch it with the idea that Korra is the villain of the series
I prefer it over atla tbh
I'm in the middle of season 3, what lore does it destroy? (If it hasn't happened yet then don't spoil it plz)
Yes. I personally prefer it over the original, but both are great.I like Korra better as a protagonist than Aang, myself. Maybe it's a hot take, but I always found Aang to be the least enjoyable part of his own series.
It's better if you watch it with the idea that Korra is the villain of the seriesThis. She's incredibly annoying. Dung had the best summarization of the seasons, overall it's just not worth watching because no one watches Season 2 of Westworld because Season 1 was amazing, you just skip S2. No one talks about season 7 & 8 & slightly 6 of GoT because for most people it ended after season 5.
first season is pretty good but ends weakly, and the inter-character dynamics are kinda lame
second season is almost unwatchably bad
third season is one of the best seasons of a cartoon ever. it's on par with book 2 of TLA
fourth season sucks but not as bad as s2
It's overall good but it lacks the cohesiveness and consistency of TLA.This. I blame that on Nickelodean and it's execs being wishy washy on supporting the show. IIRC, the last 2 seasons didn't even air on TV. We had to watch them on Nick's website.
This. I blame that on Nickelodean and it's execs being wishy washy on supporting the show. IIRC, the last 2 seasons didn't even air on TV. We had to watch them on Nick's website.
Depends on what kind of things bother you. And no, this is not a matter of "woke" or not, unless a female protagonist existing messes with you that badly.
Some of the characters and interactions, from the parts I saw, are not great. And then yes, there is the lore stuff, as well as that it just FEELS like it is trying to "advance" things too much.
I mean, technically, the rate of advancement is not all that unrealistic as the real world had some pretty rapid within-half-a-century changes and it had just come out of a war that ended with fire-powered steam tanks and airships and stuff like that which can easily have jump-started the civilian sector. But the way that bending advanced so much is a bit hit or miss. And the general feel of the two settings is somewhat jarringly different.
Imagine if, say, Lord of the Rings had a sequel trilogy, but that its a steampunk setting about the dwarves and elves waging war against each other with airships with cannons. I mean, it could be pretty cool, but would it really be "Lord of the Rings" at that point, or something different that just forces its way into LotR's future timeline for the sake of being able to use the name, and make callbacks to the original storylines here and there?
I'm not saying that splitting up a setting into chunks of time that are significantly different cannot work. See Jojo's Bizzare Adventure, where every "season" is the story of that generation's Jojo, and which for the first couple, the way the powers work changes each time until Stands appear. Jojo does make this generational timeskip a series characteristic fairly early on, and the world setting itself isn't necessarily a huge draw though since it is using Earth at various points in the past century-and-a-half or so of history.
I liked the action but the writing is amongst the most idiotic I've ever seen in a show. I'd never bother rewatching it, definitely do not recommend it.You've never seen the animated castlevania series. There are middle school kids who could have done better