Rowling mask off.

Current Events

Current Events » Rowling mask off.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/73468f75.png
Well the folks who say "Name one thing Rowling said that is transphobic" having a harder time of it day by day.

Of course, now they'll move on to "Yes she's transphobic and I'm glad she is".
CyricZ He/him
http://twitch.tv/cyricz42
hasn't she been "mask off" for the better part of a decade now?
Variable General Veeg, at your service
Yeah it's not the first time she's done it. 100% of people that defend her know what's she's about. The ones that claim she isn't transphobic are lying as a smokescreen. They are horrible people as well.
My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds
3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115
IB Gob defends
Reminder that India Willoughby has to have round the clock protection by British counter-terrorist police.
'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'.
Why is she so full of hate?
Post #7 was unavailable or deleted.
Pretty confident she doesnt own a mask.
ImAMarvel posted...
Remember when we all used to love Rowling?
You mean when we didnt know anything about her beyond the rags-to-riches narrative.
Utterly deranged and obsessed with erasing trans people. She has blood on her hands.
[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
*keeps the "days since Rowling was a transphobe" sign at 0*
Just because I have 99% of a heart doesn't mean it can't kill me. It's tried. Twice.
My body has a dongle and my heart doesn't care. He/They
Kami_no_Kami posted...
Pretty confident she doesnt own a mask.

You mean when we didnt know anything about her beyond the rags-to-riches narrative.
she was a pretty run of the mill liberal before
Crimsoness posted...
Why is she so full of hate?
She got creeped on by a cis guy once therefore all trans women are bad.

I don't really understand it myself but that's essentially what her argument is.
It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha."
https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg
ImAMarvel posted...
Remember when we all used to love Rowling?

Nah, I'm adamant in my assertion that she's always given off subtle villain vibes.
Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read.
Post #14 was unavailable or deleted.
I didn't read her shit books but got dragged to the movies and them goblins were racist af.
---
I never liked Harry Potter, and having to deal with all the love it got before the transphobia was mildly irritating.
'Vinyl is the poor man's art collection'.
I've never read nor watched HP, I don't intend to change that
Voidgolem posted...
hasn't she been "mask off" for the better part of a decade now?
Not really. Up until now the anti-trans trolls defending her have been able to ask to see which transphobic comments Rowling has made, giving them the facade of respectability by pretending that they just haven't seen her objectionable comments. Now though there's just so much out there that they've given up the facade and admit what they believed all along which is that 'transphobic' doesn't exist as a concept and thus Rowling can't have said anything transphobic.

It's a new phase of the hate spiral. Now they can't pretend to be the respectable ones any more. Further increased radicalization and explicit calls for anti-trans discrimination are where we go from here.
"Bothering people when they're shopping or going to work or whatever because you find them attractive makes you scum of the earth."
MegatokyoEd
Tyranthraxus posted...
She got creeped on by a cis guy once therefore all trans women are bad.

I don't really understand it myself but that's essentially what her argument is.

Terfs in generally are so "anti-men" that they view Trans as Men attempting to hijack Women spaces.
DI MOLTO!
Lillymon posted...
Not really. Up until now the anti-trans trolls defending her have been able to ask to see which transphobic comments Rowling has made, giving them the facade of respectability by pretending that they just haven't seen her objectionable comments. Now though there's just so much out there that they've given up the facade and admit what they believed all along which is that 'transphobic' doesn't exist as a concept and thus Rowling can't have said anything transphobic.

It's a new phase of the hate spiral. Now they can't pretend to be the respectable ones any more. Further increased radicalization and explicit calls for anti-trans discrimination are where we go from here.
Indeed. She had been careful in the past. It's been part of this whole sordid affair how "above" she kept herself from engaging in the coarser language while being content to let the less celebrity of the anti-trans movement get absolutely vile.

This is what a publicist would call an "oopsy woopsy, just a little fucky wucky".
CyricZ He/him
http://twitch.tv/cyricz42
What mask?
Black Lives Matter. ~ DYL ~ (On mobile)
Prestoff posted...
Terfs in generally are so "anti-men" that they view Trans as Men attempting to hijack Women spaces.
Terfs would have to actually go after men first for that to be true.
[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
Im so glad I was never invested in Harry Potter
Hope rides alone
Current Events » Rowling mask off.