I thought this was about monosodium glutamate, quite confused for a second there.Glad Im not the only one. Ive never heard of MSG Entertainment.
I don't want to live in a society where my seasoning judges me
If something harmful happened to the girls while the mom was kicked out by force, the business would be criminally liable
The fact that so many people just cool with this software in general is scary"They'll never target me!"
The fact that so many people just cool with this software in general is scary
It kinda has that "I don't care if the government can read my texts. I have nothing to hide." head in the sand feel to it.Technology can always be misused. What if someone hacks the program and makes it declare innocent people to be terrorists? Movies always tell us about this stuff to warn us.
Counter to that though, is if this technology finds someone entering a 6K seat theatre, or something bigger, like and airport, that's on some terror watchlist and they're going in there with the intentions on doing harm, than who can argue that it is a "bad" thing.
Technology can always be misused. What if someone hacks the program and makes it declare innocent people to be terrorists? Movies always tell us about this stuff to warn us.That could be said about ANY technology/discovery though, going all the way back to the discovery of fire.
If I was trying to win a lawsuit against MSG for some kind of problem and one of my dumbass lawyers opened the door to them being able to refute my claims because she clearly thought it was a great place to take her kids, she would be fired.The firm has said they support the woman and are angry what happened to her. They don't seem to be looking at the incident the way you are. She didn't break a rule. She isn't involved in the case. Her firm is but not every employee at the firm is on that case
Im honestly surprised there isnt some kind of a prohibition against patronizing someone your firm is actively suing.
Literally the only way to counter that would be to say you were going there to see what you could learn about any problems. Which is the whole reason for MSG having the policy.
Well you can't hack a fire but....
I just think we should be careful letting systems like this get set up
Even people who think they have nothing to hide ignore that the government could change and change laws so something you do is now illegal. And what if they retroactively punish? They could go through your entire internet life history and find out if you ever committed the thing that just became illegal
But again, this could be said about literally any discovery/invention.Again you can't hack a fire. You keep acting like every invention since the stone age is a computer program. I'm talking specifically about modern stuff that wasn't possible for most of human history. No invention in the past allowed people to spy on citizens like modern cameras and computer technology and satellites
You can't live your life based on retroactive "what ifs".
Again you can't hack a fire. You keep acting like every invention since the stone age is a computer program. I'm talking specifically about modern stuff that wasn't possible for most of human history. No invention in the past allowed people to spy on citizens like modern cameras and computer technology and satellitesBut you could say we shouldn't use fire to warm ourselves because it can burn us if used improperly.
And I can live my life on being wary of letting surveillance technology take over the world
Again you can't hack a fire. You keep acting like every invention since the stone age is a computer program. I'm talking specifically about modern stuff that wasn't possible for most of human history invention in the past allowed people to spy on citizens like modern cameras and computer technology and satellites
And I can live my life on being wary of letting surveillance technology take over the world
And I am confused. This helps the firm. Not hurts it. The company just fucked themselves