Multi-modal approaches (Combing text/words and with images or physical experience) are nearly universally better than catering to the non-scientific "learning style" approach.double-duh.
i have no doubt that i learn better with a hands on-approach than reading a book or listening to someone talk and no one can convince me otherwise.
Boy I love when people outside education with no training in pedagogy or theory try to discuss the subject
I can definitely say even from my job that interpret data and information when looking at a visual representation. This isnt to say I cant read and interpret something, it just takes me longer.
Additionally visual representation holds my attention more easy, and I tend to space out while reading.
Boy I love when people outside education with no training in pedagogy or theory try to discuss the subject
I seriously doubt you know about life as much as you think you do >_>
People like this guy:Unlike you, I work in education, teach college, and am currently finishing my MA (which is heavily rooted in pedagogy). Try again!
Unlike you, I work in education, teach college, and am currently finishing my MA (which is heavily rooted in pedagogy). Try again!
Buddy, thats my major and youre working with college kidsI work with students of all ages; I teach college. I don't give a fuck what your BA major is lmao.
Try again!
I work with students of all ages; I teach college. I don't give a fuck what your BA major is lmao.
That kind of felt like clickbait. The widespread efficacies of multi-modal learning and retention strategies don't really debunk the notion that learning styles exist. Some students have significant discrepancies between their various processing abilities, and that absolutely affects them in school. While certain methods of teaching are likely to work better across the board for specific subjects (e.g. using maps in geography), I expect students would still experience different outcomes with those methods, depending on their learning styles.
i have no doubt that i learn better with a hands on-approach than reading a book or listening to someone talk and no one can convince me otherwise.
To the extent to which everyone does, sure.
I'm willing to bet that "learning styles" as a concept was invented to find more creative ways to tell dumb kids that they aren't dumb.this lol
"Oh, you're failing all your classes? But you do so well in gym, you must be a physical learner."
That kind of felt like clickbait. The widespread efficacies of multi-modal learning and retention strategies don't really debunk the notion that learning styles exist. Some students have significant discrepancies between their various processing abilities, and that absolutely affects them in school. While certain methods of teaching are likely to work better across the board for specific subjects (e.g. using maps in geography), I expect students would still experience different outcomes with those methods, depending on their learning styles.Video from one of the most respected science explainers on YT:
Well if a YouTube video said it, it must be trueAs opposed to what, the teacher who told you about it in fifth grade?
People have literally studied this and found no consistent individual differences.Well maybe it's like spanking and they haven't studied it in a very specific way that confirms my biases.
TC please tell me at least that Rush Style, Beast Style, and Breaker Style exist.Not after 2005
Not after 2005I'd object to this but I forget how far you are in the series and don't wanna spoil nothin'.
I'd object to this but I forget how far you are in the series and don't wanna spoil nothin'.I've beaten them all. Think of the timeline. Kiryu doesn't use styles after Kiwami.
I've beaten them all. Think of the timeline. Kiryu doesn't use styles after Kiwami.
Well if a YouTube video said it, it must be trueHe has tons of sources in the description. Many dispute their existence with data.