Topic List

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Joker_X_II

Topics: 11
Last Topic: 1:38:49pm, 09/08/2020
Burn in hell Kotaku UK..!

Posts: 27
Last Post: 3:55:26pm, 07/15/2018
NightMareBunny posted...
does the LGBTQ community realize that transgenders are such a minority that no matter what they do there will always be a microscopic amount of them in the grand scheme of things?


This, exactly.....

This is going to be a case of "Get Woke, Go Broke" again....

So the LGBTQP groups wants a real trans acting in this movie, but honestly of all the A-list (even B-list actors) there isn't any "real" trans actors who could sell this movie to the masses. Scarlett Johansson would've brought some star power to the movie, could've been an Oscar nod of a role and movie itself; and still would've gave the "representation" these groups wanted.

Now because of this fake outrage from SJWs, the studio is in a bind..... The director can't scrap the film because then the outrage would continue citing prejudices. And they can't find a WORTHY actor to tackle the role and fulfill the vision the director had for the film.

So now they're going to crank this movie out, with a no name actor that isn't going to sell the movie. At best they'll fish someone out of the E-Hollywood tabloid circuit to fill the role, and turn the whole film into a propganda for these LGBTQP fringe groups.

THEN you're going to get these market analyzers that's going to come to the conclusion that this film will bring in a paltry few million (barely breaking even with the budget of the film, at best), but also predict that they could've brought in revenue that doubles the production budget at best if Scarlett Johansson was in the film.
---
PSA: "Real Gamers*" don't pay for Micro-transactions.
*Pro-tip: You're not 'playing' the game, if you're paying your way through it.


Manual Topics: 0
Last Topic:
[none]

Manual Posts: 0
Last Post:
[none]
---