nemu posted...ArtiRock posted...
nemu posted...
Antifar posted...
nemu posted...
Ancor babies are a problem.
Are they?
The fact that they can happen shows a clear failing in the system that was obviously not intended.
And ignoring the constitution is without a shadow of a doubt worse, and yet you support that. Which no one in their right mind should. Considering we have stupid things like people losing their ability to vote without their knowledge or consent because of "misspellings" that may or may not be their fault, the last thing we need is for people to start saying that you somehow aren't actually a citizen because your parent's name was wrong or something stupid.
No. You want to amend a constitutional amendment. Do it right. Or don't do it at all.
If what he is doing is within the bounds of presidential power, I support it. If what he is doing is impossible/an abuse, then I don't support it. I do think that is a good change that should be made, even if it's done through another avenue.
It's not. It's trying to use EOs to ignore the proper way of amending the constitution. EOs are bad because they literally reverse the way the government is supposed to be working. Judicial should absolutely not be the one to say "ERRRR wrong, you're not doing that Mr. President." That's literally supposed to be the legislative branch that's being told not to do these things. Not Executive. EOs need to go.
---
This is the duty of the Grim Angels.