I'll say. Wifey has relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and when she was partially paralysed for a couple of months during a particularly severe relapse, she didn't get a penny. But against that, I knew a neighbour years before whose living expenses were largely financed by the taxpayer because he was too drunk to work most of the time. Was it because of personal connections, a sympathetic or naive caseworker? Who knows? The system's like a rigged pinball machine that sometimes seems to be tilted in favour of the least deserving.