AssultTank posted... Part of my argument is that it is an ill-conceived list. Guns that should be on the list and aren't based on the list itself are literally evidence of my claim. Non-firearms being on a list of firearms to be banned is also evidence.
It sounds perfectly reasonably conceived. Your examples (accidentally) proved that lol because they were mostly wrong. Why should a gun that hasn't been made in 13 years be on there? Or one you couldn't even buy in that country in the first place?
Canada can ban guns for all I care, my whole argument is that this ban is ill-conceived and won't help anyway.
It sounds like you care deeply
The fact that 70-90% of all gun crime in Canada is committed with guns that were illegally owned BEFORE the ban is evidence of that second claim.
Now only if that was 100% then you'd have a point
You however have provided no evidence to the contrary and at this point are just trolling. So have a nice night.
Provide evidence of what? I'm just asking questions and picking your links and incorrect points apart with no effort. You gun types are easy to debate.
---
"we love dancing.. and violence."
https://youtu.be/KxbEBcq5tEc