Lurker > youenjoymyself1

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


so what happened in this case?

mental illness?

we gonna conveniently blame mental Illness on this one, but yet the other 95% are because of right wing extremists

so the obvious answer is to ban guns

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


pretty ironic thing to say in this topic

supergamerbret posted...

Man white people discrimination is getting out of hand. Someone should help them.

Yeah pretty insensitive thing to say in a topic about a person who clearly wrote that they are targeting white children and hope their kill count is high

but you do you

darkace77450 posted...

fixed that for you

yeah except those have been available to the public for over 50-75 or so years. Before 1986 you could buy a machine gun at sears

our own government changed the nfa so they could sell surplus m1 carbines to civilians. Those are way more powerful than the Kel Tec 9mm used in the Nashville shooting

so why the massive uptick in mass shootings in the last 30 years if access to firearms has remained the same (actually gotten more restricted, but whatever for arguments sake well act like the 2nd amendment hasnt been butchered in that time)

KitKats posted...

Something something Kyle Rittenhouse

something something dude that chased down Kyle Rittenhouse while he was running away from an angry mob (who were yelling get his ass) and pulled a Glock on him was acting in self defense! It was an active shooter situation!

gotta love CE man

I mean the less you do it the better it feels

BunkerBoy posted...

It's mostly just right wing losers crying about it

Crying about what exactly?

BunkerBoy posted...

Wrong topic? Year old article about a different movie

"The right complains about everything"

*Points to a bunch of liberals complaining about all white people in a historical biographical film*

"I fail to see the connection"

https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/cillian-murphy-oppenheimer-christopher-nolan-racism.html

Incels are going to see barbie?

ooger posted...

Did you just call me "people"?

Fair enough. I put dude on ignore.

Anyway have a good evening I'm gonna go play DMZ if anyone wants to team up DM me and I'll give you my Activision name

Heartomaton posted...

Honestly I've just been skimming your posts that aren't directly replying to me, but as far as I know, you haven't really said anything definitive so far.

But I figure it's safe to assume that the reason for that is because doing so would get that alt canned, taking another place to be wrong away from you.

Soooo, the statements you would be making if they wouldn't get you tossed again would be about the minority sections of the population that make you cry because they exist.

So them. Their civil rights.

I'm putting you on ignore. You're doing mental gymnastics (as well as making multiple assumptions based on the actions of Gamefaqs mods) for personal validation. I honestly don't have time for people like that

ooger posted...

Oh okay. What do you want to chat about?

I would kinda like to know why tf people think I'm against civil rights when I defined wokeness as corporate pandering and a tolerance contest for most people aren't tolerant of.

I'm not even saying people shouldn't be tolerant, and I really don't give a fuck about Ariel being black or whatever.

However, I'm like every other American, when I see the videos of drag queens twerking on kids and the parents clapping and cheering it makes me wonder what the fuck happened. The thing is, these are isolated incidents, I'm not stupid enough to think they aren't, but if everyone in the room is cheering it on, then if it wasn't isolated would it still be tolerated?

Brah had those dope ass substitute sequels.

He always reminded me of Bill Pullman for some reason

ooger posted...

So, you leaving, or what?

No, specifically because of you

I said that like 54 minutes ago.

And yeah still waiting on a post anywhere I said I was against anyone's civil rights

Heartomaton posted...

You can't really deny that as the truth, or you would. Every civil rights movement that's happened in this country in the past is right there for the precedent.

So when did I say I was against anyone's civil rights again? Point to that post please.

Heartomaton posted...

All my messages are on my original account tho.

I don't even know if I have any amp on my og account. I was already logged in under this one.

Heartomaton posted...

I'm on the wrong side of history about

Lmao. Jfc.

Heartomaton posted...

So me being here is more "time wasting" and less "I can't stay away from the places I b**** about."

I have spent like an hour here in the last month, most of it tonight, but yeah I'm online and wrong all of the time, because CE and r/whitepeopletwitter told me I'm on the wrong side of history! I haven't been validated constantly by the cool people on the internet so yeah your wasting time and mine are totally different

GATTJT posted...

LMAO he posts this shit and then KEEPS POSTING

Dude, you're the very type of person that you're insulting

I've been here for less than 30 minutes. Haven't been to this site in at least 2 or 3 days before I started to post.

Also I'm not really going back and forth with anyone. Like 3 people tagged me asking me to define "woke" and I did it and apparently my definition isn't even good enough lmao. Which just proves my point that it's a waste of time

youenjoymyself1 posted...

Anyway I'll see myself out now my food is ready feel free to talk about how stupid I am or whatever even though I didn't say anything right of Mitt Romney or any "progressive" pre 2009

Heartomaton posted...

That's way more words to say "I'm always wrong and online too much" than was necessary.

Kinda funny considering your amp and the frequency of your visits here.

When is the last time you've gone a day without coming here when you weren't banned or prohibited from using? Hell 5 hours not counting sleep? I bet it's been years.

Anyway I'll see myself out now my food is ready feel free to talk about how stupid I am or whatever even though I didn't say anything right of Mitt Romney or any "progressive" pre 2009

ooger posted...

Didn't you just say you're here because reddit is slow?

I don't indulge in political discourse on Reddit.

Even if I did, it wouldn't change the fact that reddit and tik tok can be problematic. I never said I was about using reddit or tik tok, I just said I thought that social media with short videos like that are good at stirring up divisive (and often false) political propaganda

GranolaPanic posted...

@youenjoymyself1

Im asking you to define what you think woke is. Thats not hard to answer, is it?

This isn't the steel trap question you think it is. But I'll bite.

It is mostly corporate pandering and a contest between people to see how tolerant they can be of shit that a lot of people aren't tolerant of just so they can act morally superior to whatever target group they are currently choosing to attack. When the contest began between peers that normally agree is when the problem started imo (I personally blame short form entertainment such as Tik Tok and reddit for that).

b_nolan posted...

Meltdown in progress

Jfc dude I'm off 2 perc 10s(prescribed, mods) and I'm waiting on my afredo dinner to finish cooking. I don't even come here anymore but reddit is pretty much dead for the next 2 days. Plus I like the TC.

That's just pathetic trying to say Im having a meltdown just to try to get me to have a meltdown, considering my AMP and it was what, my second or third post in a topic?

Just because it was longer than one sentence I'm having a "melty". Cool

NatsuSama posted...

Prove it exists, and while you're at it, define it.

If it doesn't exist then you should have nothing to worry about come 2024 elections

If the "culture war" is all bullshit and that is truly the only ammo the conservatives have, then the Democrats have it in the bag

I love the classic liberal tactic of saying "this doesn't exist"

Then when it is proven "it" does exist "it" is always "not as bad as people are making it out to be" or "it's an isolated incident" or "it's not that serious bro".

It never fails, no matter the topic at hand.

Heineken14 posted...

You people are so weird.

Lol after months of the Amber Heard "I can fix her" jokes it still flies over your head that I'm making one?

Also arent you one of the guys who gushes over AOC constantly? Lmao.

Didn't she just file for divorce? I'd be so down to buss in dat and give her a fourth. I could fix her.

I ain't givin up my truck

I just want an until dawn PC release

RuneterranSnap posted...

Trump doesn't understand that and republicans don't care about laws.

They asked him if he'd sign Graham's 15 week ban if it reached his desk. I think he understands.

RuneterranSnap posted...

Still unacceptable

Unacceptable for you? Or unacceptable for the majority of voters? I don't think moderates particularly care about the right to abort a "clump of cells" after it isn't a "clump of cells", which is why they conveniently leave the "15 week" thing out of headlines.

RuneterranSnap posted...

If Trump wins we might not see a civil war, but we WILL be seeing a rise of freedom fighter groups. We've seen it in the past, and it can get particularly ugly. And no, it won't be "quickly squashed" as you think.

Oh so now we need a 2A to fight tyranny is what you're saying, right? Meal team six has a chance, but only if they are democrats, right?

- this is not a total abortion ban. Ban after 15 weeks. That leaves a whole trimester to abort a baby.
- the president can't just make laws. This would have to pass through senate and house first.
Zikten posted...

This could cause a Civil war

I don't think banning abortion after 15 weeks is gonna cause enough people to attack that government to label it a "civil war". Maybe a couple of terror attacks that would get quickly squashed.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


There is a way, within our constitution, to get rid of the 2a. It doesn't have enough public support.

Also the last constitution of France was set up under a violent revolution. Are you implying the same thing needs to happen here?

Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...

What I did was easier than getting a driver's license renewed, which was the comment that promoted this chain

That's false also.

You can get your license renewed on your cell phone

Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...

In Missouri, I walked in, said what gun I wanted and left 10 minutes later with it.

You didn't fill out a form 4473 (federal background check) and wait on it to pass?

If you didn't then the owner of said store committed a major felony punishable by up to 20 years in a federal prison and a $500k fine.

littlebro07 posted...

iirc Texas is pretty close to that. Go to gun store, pick out gun, pay for gun, leave with gun. As simple as running to the gas station for a soda.

You remember wrong. The FBI NICS 4473 must be filled out and approved by the federal government.

This used to be bypassed via a concealed carry permit (which is a yearly NICS background check) but recently the FBI/ATF said that is not enough and that a 4473 must be run on every weapon sold by an FFL in the entire united states.

CADE_FOSTER posted...

you arent kidding i can walk in a get any gun easily Abbott made in a pain in the ass to renew or get a new id or drivers license fucking hate texas

What do you think you have to do to "walk in a get any gun easily". What are the steps you have to follow to legally buy a gun in Texas?

You prob think all gun/pawn shops have the RE4 merchant inside "you have the stench of combat on you stranger, would you like to trade some rubies for this full auto assault rifle, no background check required stranger, good luck to you stranger"

MabusIncarnate posted...

Its easier to get an assault rifle than a drivers license in Texas. People need that freedom to shoot shit in their front lawn in the middle of the night after all.

False

BearlyWilling posted...

I support shipping all right wingers to Texas and Florida and kicking both states out of the country.

So cute that you think that all the guns would follow them.

GaryGensler posted...

Oh, maybe it was feet. Tbh, I don't even know. It just says 30 or 60 on the machine lol.

Yeah if it's indoor it is feet typically unless it is a long range one for rifles.

Anyway if you plan on doing this a lot to get better, don't waste money on the cool human silhouette targets yet and just shoot at regular bullseye target. You can get ones that contrast with orange when you shoot them so that you can see your hits easily without bringing the target back and checking

It looks like you're shooting like "let's see about headshots, now toroso shots" when you should just focus on seeing how many shots you can put right on top of one another.

Why would you shoot a target with a handgun for the first time at 30 yards? Are you sure you don't mean 30 feet? 30 yards is 90 feet. These aren't typical handgun shooting distances.

Lol start at 5-10 until you can shoot an actual group, them move it out from there.