Lurker > kangolcone

No, its specifically doesnt say that. It says that somebody who has both been infected and received the vaccine is the most protected.

Ill never understand the people who lie after posting an article.

ArvTheGreat posted...

Arvs a snowflake cause of what happened 200 years ago

There you are, Arv. I fixed it for Arv.

Veedrock- posted...

Fuck me, you're that guy that puts words in people's mouths. Got you tagged now as wet hands, won't happen again!

I appreciate this answer.

You are the one who said there was no value to historically accurate context. Its not my fault you have terrible arguments.

Veedrock- posted...

"Slavery was wrong" needs context?

So your saying that historical context has no value. Got it.

Why is a factual statement about history so upsetting to you?

Veedrock- posted...

At the risk of being harassed by the usual crowd, I don't see what "white people" adds to that statement.

Factual information and context.

GanonsSpirit posted...

Imagine making a strawman this stupid and expecting people to still take you seriously.

He also had an entire topic where he tried to tell me people are too sensitive and words shouldnt bother them.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Imagine being upset they're saying "Try not to be a dickhead while calling all white people assholes"

Who is calling all white people assholes?

Krazy_Kirby posted...

if you create safe spaces and change words for everyone else, you have to do it for something you don't like

@Krazy_Kirby

Please provide a concrete example of this. Keep in mind, this doesnt change any words. It actually contains no parameters other than white people should not experience discomfort when discussing difficult issues such as race.

BlackScythe0 posted...

What does discomfort even mean here?

Some people dont actually have an identity or personality. So when you say something like slavery as perpetrated by white people in the US was wrong, the instinctual reaction is that for some reason means they are a bad and racist individual person.

https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-01-18/florida-could-shield-whites-from-discomfort-of-racist-past

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Basically all new cars now have a means for the car to interfere with each wheel individuallly, cut the engine and adjust your steering, there's no need for passivity

It does not appear you read the article.

Notschmendrake posted...

Kang is still in here raging?
Jesus christ yo. Get a life.

Seems like you follow me from topic to topic. I mean, I can understand you are clearly a big fan of mine, but your obsession for me is weird at this point.

Zeus posted...

Provided the system warns people of a shutdown and the cops have a visual, it's very viable. Nobody is proposing what you think is happening -- a blind shutdown when a car may or may not be operating (although hackers might do that).

You're basically suggesting the most ridiculous way something could work while saying it couldn't work that way, despite the fact nobody suggesting it will work how you describe.

It's interesting how you keep going back to "randomly shutting off" when that's not what they're suggesting at all.

Any care with a heavily electronic system has that chance. The smarter the car, the easier it is to remotely interfere with its functioning because there's more to manipulate.

What do you think a kill switch with passive monitoring would do other than turn the car off?

Revelation34 posted...

Irony.

You dont understand what irony is. Leet came in and asked a specific question about a circumstance he had encountered. He talks about how it is hard for him to pick up on those cues because of his diagnosis. I didnt find a random stranger and interject myself into their life.

streamofthesky posted...

They could have some indoor sports w/ no snow/ice aspect, like basketball, wrestling, and indoor volleyball, in the Winter games, but they don't.

Not my fault they present themselves as a gimmick.
Meanwhile The Olympics actually feels like a broad display of all kinds of sports w/o any weirdly specific theme, and includes all of the original events from the Greek games (aside from Pankration, which tragically still is not included, but if it ever is, it's going to be in the Summer).

If they did include those sports, others would complain those events have nothing to do with winter.

Also, Im not sure the inclusion of snow or ice is weirdly specific when it comes to winter.

My dudes dont dance, they just pull up their pants and do the rockaway. Now lean back.

STEROLIZER posted...

Feel free to tell me how else you are raging against the machine. I'm interested.

What gimmick? Its a single post about NFT's because that is what the poll was about. You just call everyone with an unpopular board opinion a gimmick?

No, I call your gimmick a gimmick because its a gimmick. And a bad one at that. You arent interested in me. You are interested in insulting me and talking about crypto. Youre also interested in belittling those who point out the obvious flaws in NFTs.

Its a bad gimmick man.

Nintendo Power Bill from Arrested Development

STEROLIZER posted...

Yea, I just "rage against the machine" by playing the system to my personal benefit, and teaching others how to use it to their own benefit. You learn the fault in it's stars, and take advantage of it. Knowledge is power and all of that jazz.

You seem to "rage" by yelling at it over the internet. To each their own :-/

Lmfao. Imagine thinking that because a person posts on the internet, they dont engage in any other way in society. Moreover, if accurately describing capitalism without any profanity is rage and yelling, you may not want to hang around message boards much as you will get your sensitive feelings hurt.

You really are the worst gimmick ever to visit POTD.

STEROLIZER posted...

The T-Shirt example doesnt make any sense. Nothing to argue with about the second bot. You are 100% correct.

But NFTs are here, they arent leaving. Rebelling wont have any affect. So now its about learning the technology so you and other gamers can navigate the system to your own benefit and make realistic requests, and provide altruistic guidance to developers who are now forced to include NFT & Meta integration into their games.

We all agree with you that capitalism is trying to consistently screw the general public by artificially inflating values of goods and services while painting them in a way to increase desirability.

wwinterj25 posted...

The attitude that people with weight issues should get help? The attitude that people will always judge others as it's human nature? The attitude that people should have thicker skin rather than get offended by simple questions? Sure. You got me.

I agree I am proving a point. People shouldn't be offended for simple questions and getting help with weight issues is for the best. I'm happy I've made that clear for you.

I didnt respond to you. I quoted you and then specifically said Leets name. Your post was an example. Go back and read it. I specifically talk to Leet while referring to you in the third person. Im happy Ive made that clear for you.

Notschmendrake posted...

Maybe we just disagree because you all come from a different timeline where this was a good topic. Maybe you should go read it all again to see what changed.

Why are you wasting your comedic genius here?

wwinterj25 posted...

Yes. That's my favourite chat up line.

Right, you dont say it because its rude and off putting. Even if you dont say those words, your attitude is surely evident.

Thats why going back to my original point I was making to poor Leet, whos topic was hijacked by people trying to prove their point instead of helping him understand social context like he wanted to, Because people who would ask random strangers their weight arent being helpful and are almost always judgmental idiots seeking to stroke their ego, much like you and Kyuubi.

wwinterj25 posted...

Research is normally done by conversation. This includes asking questions sometimes. Questions that sometimes involve someones weight.

Nah. It just wasn't worth responding to.

Do you start off the research by saying You are gross and I can make you not gross. Or are you dishonest about your feelings of them?

Notschmendrake posted...

Have you ever tried not being mad all the time? That shit cant be good for you.

And if you're going to be mad all the time could you at least try to be funnier?

Ok, so it is the stalking. Weird to be this obsessed with me. Hope you have a good day.

Seems like I cant open a topic without this Not guy talking about me.

Maybe stop stalking me? Or perhaps we both click on topics that are active and respond.

Im glad you take such notice of me. Only because you mentioned me multiple times by name did I take notice of you, otherwise I would have kept going right by your posts.

wwinterj25 posted...

Not to someone who doesn't want to help themselves by the look of it but again just because YOU think my advice isn't helpful doesn't mean others don't. You can repeat your opinion all you want as it changes nothing. People with weight issues shouldn't get offended when folk point out the issues they have if they refuse to fix it.

How do you know they havent tried the advice you are about to offer?

Its also smart to delete the first part of my post because you see how you contradict yourself. Good move.

wwinterj25 posted...

Yeah. Friends tend to help guide each other. Shocking I know.

So you shouldnt stick your nose in a friends business, but you should for a complete stranger. Got it.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Yes.

No.

You're trying to.

Go to bed.

Youve repeatedly told me to stop posting. If anything, you are the suppressor of thought. You and the other guy are free to be as rude as you would like. Im simply disillusioning you of the importance you think you have.

wwinterj25 posted...

As they are responses to two different topics and my quote was in reference to one person not a group of people I don't see how. Nice try though. Your argument about people with weight issues(not just obese) not needing help is bizarre. Even more so getting offended when folk point out weight issues.

When you ask a person about their weight, you are asking an individual, not a group of people. Nice try though. And I didnt say they didnt need help. Ive repeatedly said what you are offering isnt needed or helpful. Again, Im saying you arent helpful. If you didnt overvalue your own importance as much as you do, you would see just because I say you arent helpful doesnt mean that there isnt any help.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Being obese is rude.

Not at all

Suppression of thoughts you don't want to hear, which is pretty abhorrent.

No, its not.

Yes it is.

Im literally unable to suppress thoughts of other people.

You are failing miserably at this.

wwinterj25 posted...

Why though? If I see someone who clearly needs help I hope they are getting it and certainly won't dance around the fact they have weight issues. If they choose to stay that way then that's on them and others will comment on it because that's human nature. Although as I said before I hope "someone you know" is getting the help they need with their weight issues. Although by your logic doctors and the like should mind their own business too.

Not really. I just don't see why people like yourself get offended by simple questions and advice. Even if people are happy being underweight/overweight it shouldn't bother them.

I pulled this from another topic. Seems to fly in the face of your entire diatribe about fat people needing to be reminded they are fat so you can give them guidance.

wwinterj25 posted...

It's probably best you just be there for her to talk to and give advice without sticking your nose in too much. She is probably aware of the issues.

wwinterj25 posted...

It's probably best you just be there for her to talk to and give advice without sticking your nose in too much. She is probably aware of the issues.

Wait, somebody is aware of an issue and your suggestion isnt to give them guidance repeatedly to remind them about it???

Kyuubi4269 posted...

This is what I'm referring to. Since he's already guilty of that, he shouldn't get bail for future claims.

He was taken into custody. That generally means he was arrested on suspicion of the crime. It does not mean he was convicted. So again, presumption of innocence.

wwinterj25 posted...

Good. Then maybe people will stop getting offended by simple questions about their weight and what they are doing to fix their issues.

Yet again, overvaluing your importance.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Use your brain, read it again and get back to me.

Nah, you're just mad grossness isn't tolerated.

Let's go with the NHS definition: "The term obese describes a person who's very overweight, with a lot of body fat."

I'm not leaving your bullshit unchallenged, more people can see your views are not tolerated.

Yes, I said body chemistry and you replied about how to cook meat. I dont know why you would connect meat being cooked and body chemistry unless you believe they are connected.

Again, I was explaining to Leet, a person who misses social cues, why it is considered rude. You continually calling people gross reinforces that.

Ok, by that definition lots of NFL players are obese. Im glad we agree.

And Im not even sure what view you think Im espousing other than people should mind their own personal business.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Preference in how your meat is cooked varies from person to person, but cremated is cremated. You can't context your way out of blobbery.

It is due diligence to speak in case nobody else has, it needs saying and them being told twice, thrice, a thousand times doesn't change the need as long as it's a problem.

Your comment only makes sense with BMI, so otherwise you were just going in to insane ramblings. I choose to treat you as though your head works.

Negative value is not value, I need to offset your bullshittery as long as you spew it.

Body chemistry isnt a personal preference.

its not due diligence, its the overestimation of your knowledge and importance.

What definition are you using tor obese?

You havent offset anything. By repeatedly responding to a topic you werent involved with, you actually amplify the number of people who see the topic.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Why would bail be granted to child molesters at all

The 5th and 14th Amendment as they regard the presumption of innocence. Although not explicitly stated, presumption of innocence is a bedrock of the American Judicial system.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Does qualify you to speak on the how gross it is and how to avoid it.

None of them do, BMI isn't a holy grail, and nothing about obesity requires you hit a BMI result.

Nah that's you, you have nothing of value to add, so should just leave.

No, it doesnt as body chemistry and lifestyle are keys and vary person to person. Your advice may not have any applicability to another person, nor do you know if they have heard that advice before and it proved to not be helpful.

I didnt mention BMI.

You came here to respond to my post. My post sparked your response. Therefore it has value because you care about my post, its why you engaged me. You are free to not respond to my posts at any time. Until that point, recognize that you found me, not the other way around.

This has to be the worst gimmick in POTD history.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

He's not obese so knows how not to be a gross mess.

Because I'm unpleasant too.

Not being a gross mess doesnt qualify you to give medical advice. A large % of the NFL qualifies as obese, yet they would out perform TC in every single physical activity.

You and TC would both benefit from a little mind your own business. Sorry that you overvalue your importance in society. Nobody really cares what you have to say.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

It was at an all-time low, that's when the fires got stoked again.

I cannot imagine saying this with a straight face. Thank you for the laugh.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

He's not obese.

Nah, you're just being unpleasant.

Ahhh yes, hes not obese so hes qualified to give unsolicited to medical advice to people he doesnt know. Got it.

And, if Im being unpleasant, why did you choose to engage with me in a topic that doesnt involve you?

Notschmendrake posted...

"If I knew some embarrassing personal details about someone I didnt like I totally wouldnt leverage that against them! Grow up!"

Lol, fuck off. If someone wants to share personal information on themselves or someone else and open that person up to ridicule that is their right as a citizen of the free world.

Its also our right to ridicule that person as a citizen of the free world. See how that works?

wwinterj25 posted...

Everyone needs guidance in some shape or form. People with weight issues even more so because it's not healthy. Not really my problem if you can't accept that fact.

How do you know what people ask me or don't? Are you my shadow? Even if they didn't ask me for advice anyway I'll for sure give them advice because they clearly need it. Moreover, getting offended when you clearly have weight issues and people point it out is dumb.

Offended by what? I have zero issue with folk asking me about my weight because I have thick skin.

You are offended that somebody is telling you that your advice is worthless.

You are correct, people do need guidance. I gave you the opportunity to display your credentials. You didnt. And I know nobody asks you for it because youve mentioned several times that you offer it unsolicited.

You arent as important as you think and your advice isnt pertinent. Thats why you are offended.

MartianManchild posted...

Well heres part of one comment from their latest instagram post just as proof. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/6/6/AAb2N0AACys-.jpg

Lmfao. This is why I come and go from this message board. Yall are way to into each others real lives. The person who wrote this, the person they are responding to, and TC all need to sign off the internet for a good long look at their life.

DrYuya posted...

We had issues in the 90s with racists and I guess most got resolved so we found new issues in the early 2000s and they mostly got resolved and so on so now we have the luxury to get mad about everything people say or said once online and I guess once that's all resolved we will move on again to some new criteria. Kind of how all this works I suppose.

I think it shouldn't be hard to see why nobody should care though because the criteria for what makes a racist keeps getting easier and easier to meet.

I'm more annoyed with Rowling for changing all her characters and story elements after the series has been complete...and for that godawful Fantastic Beasts sequel. Legit this is an issue that matters 10000X more to me.

Racism was solved in the 90s? Lmfao.

Zeus posted...

While you can bullshit all you want, this is almost certainly the direction the technology is going. And when it's implemented, there will very likely be ways to either handle a highway shutdown or -- more likely -- they'll simply wait for them to leave the highway before initiating the shutdown.

And while that should concern any citizen with a healthy understanding of government excess, the *much* bigger issue is that any backdoor the government adds to a system can and will be exploited by criminals. And keep in mind they've repeatedly tried to do this in other areas:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-security-congress-insight/spy-agency-ducks-questions-about-back-doors-in-tech-products-idUSKBN27D1CS

Unfortunately, the US government isn't big on good ideas when it comes to citizens' rights.

The author of the article states cars would shut down in the middle of driving. That idea is ludicrous.

Secondly, its interesting that you think a car randomly shutting down is only an issue on a highway. Have you never driven on a Saturday night in a major city? But sure, Im positive cars are just going to stop on 5th and 23rd in NYC. Wont be any safety issues there.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

The EU is literally introducing breathalyser starters in the near future, it's very believable.

Lets see. A car not starting because the operator is intoxicated versus a car shutting down while going 65 with no warning and surrounded by other cars. One of these will literally prevent an accident. One of these would cause accidents.

The idea and your comparison are both absurd.

TrepeGroupie2 posted...

Lmaooo, I'm not saying anything that could get me banned.

Nice argument, how to say you are a misogynist without saying you're a misogynist. Agree woke and cancelled are buzzwords but at least I'm not OP who's using them incorrectly.

Its not an argument. Im merely pointing out your use of buzzwords when stating another person is repeating buzzwords.