Lurker > PPPPLAASSUMA

My best guess is they will save money from server costs by cutting everyone off, while also opening up the flood gates for those people to pay for themselves. I'd imagine even if they didn't get a sub boost they'd still save money.

As for chrome, i feel like a growing majority of its users are on an android phone with zero ad blocking, not a computer. I don't even own a computer and use Chrome because idc.

All of this is said with little knowledge BTW. Just occams razor.

adjl posted...

Alternatively, the executives and shareholders can milk rapid, unsustainable growth for as long as they can, then abandon the company to die once the value peaks and move on to the next company that they'll milk. The people making decisions like this aren't the ones that stand to suffer in any meaningful way if the company goes under, and in many cases they stand to gain more by bouncing from bursting bubble to bursting bubble than by trying to maintain moderate, sustainable revenue. They aren't incompetent so much as they don't care about what consumers want. This is, in fact, capitalism working as intended.

Yep.

SMT v

Work on yourself.