Lurker > Mackorov

dudes gonna go to parler

The people you are arguing with lack the ability have rational thoughts. It's always Dems = great amazing leaders Republicans = fascist nazis
They can't even comprehend the fact that people can have different views on issues and not be 100% party loyalists. Trying to have a reasonable discussion with people who are this delusional is impossible. Let them keep dreaming that some day the world will all be liberal and we'll have no cops and everyone will just love each other lmao

More Republicans supported the breach yesterday than opposed it on surveys yesterday..

the thing is you clearly dont pay enough attention to the ongoings of the country to give off any sense of credibility.

like, you do you, but what youre saying just looks stupid to anyone who actually pays attention to both political sides.

Republicans literally tried to violently overthrow election results to install a leader who had just lost the election

Another point to add:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79224443

This organization conducted a poll among 1400 registered voters and found a plurality of them to be in support of storming the capital. Perhaps the sampling is biased, but this is the only evidence I've seen on the matter. This suggests that support for what happens yesterday is hardly a small minority in the Republican wing.

I didn't say this or really anything else in your post. When I see "Trump supporter", I interpret that as somebody who supports Trump being in power and would vote to do so. You seem to be using the term to only refer to extremists, so this is just a semantics thing.

They're a group. They just don't have centralized leadership. Some chapters even have websites, but they are also definitely a boogeyman for the right, since most antifa members are more likely to be young college kids LARPing about being revolutionaries than actual adults willing and able to cause real violence. The moment you form networks, coalitions, organized events, and rally under a flag I think it's a little silly to claim that you're not a group.

For example:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_City_Antifa
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torch_Network

https://www.adl.org/antifa

I was under the impression that polls showed most Republicans support Trump. Am I mistaken?

Anifa is NOT a group. It's just a BS term used to refer to a very generalised population you hate. It's like saying incels is an organisation or what, weeaboos is an orgainsation.

They're not. The far-left political movement is simply called anifa but there's no one group. It's just a disenfranchise of factions, cells and any group against fascism.

There's some you should condemn though, like those far off in the political spectrum into promoting communism and Marxist ideologies. These are the ones republicans are taught to fear but obviously doesn't encapsulate most liberal-leaning democrats. Same way how Trump supporters shouldn't encapsulate most conservative-leaning republicans.

Yes, people on the Right including Trump's own lawyers are already pushing that Antifa did it, and some people are saying that the crowd was Antifa in disguise.

Is Fox News even saying this? They have been backpeddaling on their Trump support lately. I assume this is more Newsmaxx and OANN saying this.

dude, life isn't just "humanoids"

we have literal proof of life on other planets. they aren't as intelligent as us, but the fact that life is out there is almost a given since our solar system is like .001% of this entire universe.

Yeah I played that DLC in Mass Effect 2

I find this argument weird in that it is basically trying to elevate anecdotal evidence into scientific fact.

You don't meet 1 person of an ethnicity and assume everyone of that ethinicity is like that one person.
But apparently 1 planet with life means we can assume there are a bunch more out there just like it.
Or said in a better way, if we find water, we find life. That is a bias.

Except we have zero proof whatsoever of the existence of aliens. The very concept of aliens is human-conceived. Because it is based on the very premise that planets THEMSELVES give birth to life, and not some third party entity or deity.

Aliens work within science and logic. They are just living beings in the material world like us, but on another planet

Gods are in the supernatural realm and defies what we know about science

Extraterrestrial life is believed to exist simply due to the fact that we ourselves exists, and given the absolute vastness of the Universe, there's a near-0% chance that we are the only life in the Universe.

I dont know how you somehow equated that to me somehow being an incel? But OK...

To all people who ask this question: You're not, never have been, and never will been

What a stunningly irrelevant point

I read the article and didn't pick up the name at the top. So I guess the takeaway here is that you are concerned with who wrote the review even more than I am?

People don't watch game reviews to decide if they want to play the game, they watch them to get hyped.

But he liked the game, and likes those kinds of games clearly, so what's the problem? Is it just that he didn't like it as much as you presume you will?

Should they keep getting people to write reviews until they can pick the 9/10 guy to publish?

Again he liked the game and the genre...

You aren't relying on this review and neither is anyone, lol

People don't watch game reviews to decide if they want to play the game, they watch them to get hyped. This phenomenon has actually been proven too. You are gonna buy the game even if gamespot gave it a 3/10, the only thing that will change is whether you like gamespot or not.

So which point was unreasonable?

7/10 isn't a negative score. It literally says "good". Anyway I only skimmed the review but it seemed ok to me. Thinking the games has too many superficial elements or choices that add nothing to the game are reasonable complaints. You can disagree with those complaints, but they are still valid complaints.

Given how important actors are to a movie that seems like a reasonable complaint.

WTF, I thought this was a pretty good review. Her criticism was well reasoned. One of the main USPs has always been how this game is supposed to be very open like a table top RPG, and a lot of the critique was grounded in that.

Actually I would find that review very inciteful because it would establish some much needed context to who the reviewer is and where their biases lie. Just like how when I see dunkey hates a JRPG it doesn't mean the game sucks, because I know dunkey hates those things.

I think the problem here isn't that gamespot gave Cyberpunk a 7/10 (which btw, is still a good score). It's that for some reason Gamers (with a capital G) expect these big review houses to pat every game they like on the head and any deviation from a 9 causes this kind of reaction.

For one thing, why do we paint the entire company because of what one guy who worked there said? Do you have everything in common with your colleagues? All like the same music the same amount?

If you wanted it to be an official company position and not the personal opinion of the person who reviewed it, warts and all, does it have any credibility at all?

Actually I would find that review very inciteful because it would establish some much needed context to who the reviewer is and where their biases lie. Just like how when I see dunkey hates a JRPG it doesn't mean the game sucks, because I know dunkey hates those things.

I think the problem here isn't that gamespot gave Cyberpunk a 7/10 (which btw, is still a good score). It's that for some reason Gamers (with a capital G) expect these big review houses to pat every game they like on the head and any deviation from a 9 causes this kind of reaction.

A person who works for a company has an opinion about a piece of entertainment media I haven't experienced

And here's what I think about that

if u hate it so much why ask people to give it clicks

CEman logic

yeah, and if they're not giving this perfect game perfect scores it is not being reviewed fairly and correctly.

fucking bullshit. i waited NINE years for this game and it's supposed to be PERFECT. any reviewer that doesn't give it a 10/10 is dead to me.

Only in gaming culture is an 8/10 review 'scathing'

Sorry now that I checked it was actually a 9/10 review.

hey man, GameSpot is our home

• There's so much to do that isn't meaningful, so a lot of it ends up feeling superfluous
• Superficial and often "edgy" aesthetic choices often have no real purpose, which makes them grating rather than adding anything relevant to the world
• The incorporation of different cultures and backgrounds is wildly inconsistent, from good to inaccurate to downright offensive