Lurker > BGleason22

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 10:19:34 PM
#39
Amputation posted...


Then why do you support someone who is anti-American? Oh, ignorance. Got it

Cool troll attempt. Bonus points will be given by the Lemmings.


If you'd like to have a serious discussion, let's start with some important questions, and we'll go from there.

Are you married?

Do you have children?

Do you own a house?

What level of debt are you in? None? Some? A lot?

Are you employed?

Do you pay for health insurance?

There are no right or wrong answers here. Or, if you just want to troll, this can be the end of our discussion.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 10:01:56 PM
#36
Amputation posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Amputation posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Antifar posted...
Some useful figures in this:
But only 52 percent of Americans have money in the stock market, matching the lowest rate in 19 years, according to a Gallup Poll from April. In 2007, according to that same poll, 65 percent reported investing in the market. Based on those Gallup numbers, many Americans lost faith in the market at exactly the wrong time — just as it was staging a powerful comeback.

Looking at the number of Americans who own stock does not tell the whole story. To get the complete picture, it is necessary to determine how stock assets are distributed overall.

I used the 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances to calculate the distribution of equity assets broken down by equity deciles.

The top 10% hold 86.8% of all the equity. The next 10% owns 9.5% of all the equity. The rest own little to none of the equity.

The definition of equity I use is explained here and includes directly-held stock, mutual funds, IRAs, and 401ks, among other ownership instruments.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*QLWwDp2Kz21aVed8cjQs6A.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*eEn0CqzhJ3KoJDwBX32dgg.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*x05UBbJnY7dKzqn7ffkevw.png


All this is to say: the vast majority of stock market gains go to the top 10%.


Crazy!! You're entire point is that people with wealth have an easier time building wealth. Who would have thunk it???? Call the WSJ

No shit sherlock, the people that invest more money will make more money. That is absolutely not stopping Joe Schmoe from making the exact same % of ROI as those that make billions a year.



BTW, awesome analysis from 2007 and 2013. Super relevant. Thanks!


Once every 5 years, the 40-something BGleason slithers out from under his rock and emerges from his salted earth to shitpost conservative bullshit on a video game message board.

The only positive is after this, it'll be another 5 years.


Seems like trolling.

Anything to add?


Yeah, that you are wrong about everything in post 32, but not that you give a shit.

Slither back away, we'll pick this up in 5 years when Trump is taking asylum in Moscow


I do give a shit.

I have a family.

I have a house.

I have a SEP IRA, I have a ROTH IRA, I have a retirement plan.

I have an HSA, I have sky rocketing premiums, I have sky rocketing deductibles.

I want my kids to have a better life then I did.

I'm an American.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:59:31 PM
#35
I mean, whatever you do, don't listen to people with experience. Those of us that have literally been there, and done that. That have learned from the dumb mistakes we made, that have capitalized on those learning experiences.

We're just dumb old 40 somethings, we live under rocks (apparently, if you don't post daily on a message board, that's a bad thing).

Sound advice.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:57:08 PM
#33
Amputation posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Antifar posted...
Some useful figures in this:
But only 52 percent of Americans have money in the stock market, matching the lowest rate in 19 years, according to a Gallup Poll from April. In 2007, according to that same poll, 65 percent reported investing in the market. Based on those Gallup numbers, many Americans lost faith in the market at exactly the wrong time — just as it was staging a powerful comeback.

Looking at the number of Americans who own stock does not tell the whole story. To get the complete picture, it is necessary to determine how stock assets are distributed overall.

I used the 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances to calculate the distribution of equity assets broken down by equity deciles.

The top 10% hold 86.8% of all the equity. The next 10% owns 9.5% of all the equity. The rest own little to none of the equity.

The definition of equity I use is explained here and includes directly-held stock, mutual funds, IRAs, and 401ks, among other ownership instruments.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*QLWwDp2Kz21aVed8cjQs6A.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*eEn0CqzhJ3KoJDwBX32dgg.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*x05UBbJnY7dKzqn7ffkevw.png


All this is to say: the vast majority of stock market gains go to the top 10%.


Crazy!! You're entire point is that people with wealth have an easier time building wealth. Who would have thunk it???? Call the WSJ

No shit sherlock, the people that invest more money will make more money. That is absolutely not stopping Joe Schmoe from making the exact same % of ROI as those that make billions a year.



BTW, awesome analysis from 2007 and 2013. Super relevant. Thanks!


Once every 5 years, the 40-something BGleason slithers out from under his rock and emerges from his salted earth to shitpost conservative bullshit on a video game message board.

The only positive is after this, it'll be another 5 years.


Seems like trolling.

Anything to add?
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:56:28 PM
#32
Antifar posted...
BGleason22 posted...
hings over here in the real world, where real people work for a living, invest, and do their best to provide for their family and retire early, are actually going pretty great.

Nobody bought "America is already great," when Hillary said it, and rightly so

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/most-americans-cant-afford-a-500-emergency-expense/
http://fortune.com/2016/09/23/majority-of-americans-are-woefully-unprepared-for-financial-emergencies/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/10/09/for-most-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/12/08/504667607/life-expectancy-in-u-s-drops-for-first-time-in-decades-report-finds


Which is exactly why Clinton lost.


Because she was going to continue every single policy that had this country by the balls.

Which is exactly why a impending repeal of the ACA is exactly what this country needs.
Which is why leaving TPP and encouraging other nations to pay for their own shit, and renegotiating a fair deal for us, as the US, is exactly what this country needs.
Which is why we hopefully, eventually pull out of, or restructure NATO, so that the US isn't footing the bill for 90% of the free world, because that is exactly what this country needs.


You may bitch and moan now, about how life isn't fair, how these policy changes are so humanely horrible, and how Trump is Satan. But, you're not seeing the big picture.

The funny thing is, that everyone that has half a brain cell will end up benefiting.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:48:04 PM
#30
Antifar posted...
Some useful figures in this:
But only 52 percent of Americans have money in the stock market, matching the lowest rate in 19 years, according to a Gallup Poll from April. In 2007, according to that same poll, 65 percent reported investing in the market. Based on those Gallup numbers, many Americans lost faith in the market at exactly the wrong time — just as it was staging a powerful comeback.

Looking at the number of Americans who own stock does not tell the whole story. To get the complete picture, it is necessary to determine how stock assets are distributed overall.

I used the 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances to calculate the distribution of equity assets broken down by equity deciles.

The top 10% hold 86.8% of all the equity. The next 10% owns 9.5% of all the equity. The rest own little to none of the equity.

The definition of equity I use is explained here and includes directly-held stock, mutual funds, IRAs, and 401ks, among other ownership instruments.
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*QLWwDp2Kz21aVed8cjQs6A.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*eEn0CqzhJ3KoJDwBX32dgg.png
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*x05UBbJnY7dKzqn7ffkevw.png


All this is to say: the vast majority of stock market gains go to the top 10%.


Crazy!! You're entire point is that people with wealth have an easier time building wealth. Who would have thunk it???? Call the WSJ

No shit sherlock, the people that invest more money will make more money. That is absolutely not stopping Joe Schmoe from making the exact same % of ROI as those that make billions a year.



BTW, awesome analysis from 2007 and 2013. Super relevant. Thanks!
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:44:26 PM
#29
ThanksUglyGod posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...
BGleason22 posted...
The DOW is at record highs, real estate is booming.

Yeah, life is terrible.


Neither of which Trump had anything to do with

Trump is still a moron


So.... life is therefore terrible?

JIC you haven't had a chance to turn away from CNN or liberal blogs, or everyone telling you how terrible of a person the president is, things over here in the real world, where real people work for a living, invest, and do their best to provide for their family and retire early, are actually going pretty great.

This has been happening for years before Trump was elected


#years....

and they are still happening.

Boooo!
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:42:45 PM
#124
What's funny is that the examples you are showing don't even "show" anything, other then a few of his TDs happened in the first half or when the score was close.

There is a common theme though: His team lost.

But hey, you'll always have that racist card to play.
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:41:00 PM
#123
TheVipaGTS posted...
BGleason22 posted...
He played in 12 games, started 11. He was 1-10. Surely if his stats weren't mostly in garbage time, he'd have lead his teams to more victorys, no?

Yes because that's how team sports, especially football, works...the defense can half ass it and the QB just has to will it, right? I added one more, the next game against the Cardinals where Kaep ran for a TD with 2 mins left to tie the game...the niners defense then let the Cardinals drive down the field and kick a FG to win the game...Totally Kaep's fault, right?


Was it Kaeps fault? Maybe not. Does that make him this great QB that absolutely should be on an NFL roster? Absolutely not.
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:39:56 PM
#122
BGleason22 posted...


Yes, keep going...

You can stop with-Kaepernick's effort lead his team to a victory.



Seriously though, do please keep going. You promised. Or were those the only examples you could find?
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:38:14 PM
#120
TheVipaGTS posted...
BGleason22 posted...
You can stop with-Kaepernick's effort lead his team to a victory.

is the QB the only player on the field?...the defense kind of has to help too, don't they? I'm just showing you all that his stats didn't come in "Garbage time" like you guys keep saying to somehow make them sound meaningless...


OK, not all, most.

He was 1-10.

1-10.
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:37:20 PM
#119
He played in 12 games, started 11. He was 1-10. Surely if his stats weren't mostly in garbage time, he'd have lead his teams to more victorys, no?
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:35:20 PM
#117
TheVipaGTS posted...
Decided to do your research for you.

Oct 16 @ Buffalo: His TD came in the 2nd Quarter. a 53 yard TD pass that put them up 10-7. It was 16 to 24 going into the 4th when the Niners defense just let the Bills have their way.

Oct 23 @ Tampa Bay: First Touchdown came in the first quarter. 17 yard TD pass that put the Niners up 14 to 0. The rest of the game was all Jameis Winston and the Bucs beating up on the Niners D.

Nov 6 v NO: First Touchdown was a 47 yard pass in the 2nd quarter making it a 21-10 lead for NO. Next one was a 65 yard touchdown in the 3rd making it a one possession game (28-20 Saints)

Do you want me to keep going? So far none of that is "Garbage Time" as the narrative states...


Yes, keep going...

You can stop with-Kaepernick's effort lead his team to a victory.
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:32:51 PM
#115
cjsdowg posted...
YellowSUV posted...

49ers were a dumpster fire last year. How much of that was in garbage time? Garbage time stats aren't impressive

http://freakonomics.com/2011/11/27/football-freakonomics-when-good-stats-go-bad-2/


WOW the excuses you people make are just crazy. ONLY ONE IS FUCKING HISTORY . Do you think all of those other teams played in all close games.


Kaepernick is one of 144 quarterbacks who have thrown 200 or more passes in the year they turned 29. The other 143 could all find jobs in the year they turned 30.

That is seriously the statistic that you are basing an argument on? What an absolutely silly, cherry picked stat.

edit - The more I read it, the more I think: "okay, why is throwing 200 passes in a year relevant"? And I can not come up with an answer.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:27:39 PM
#24
Let me guess, those are for the 1%

Holy fuck, the naivete of some people and the gall to think that their opinion on matters that they have zero knowledge in, actually carries merit.

Put everything you own into a REIT or a standard growth fund.
Ride the wave.
Profit.
Laugh at all the dummies, screaming about how horrible Trump is, while anyone with half a brain makes bank.


Sorry to derail your Trump bashing. Everyone in school, living with mom and dad, or working paycheck to paycheck by there own poor choices, can continue now.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:14:40 PM
#23
Tmaster148 posted...
Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...
BGleason22 posted...
The DOW is at record highs, real estate is booming.

Yeah, life is terrible.


Neither of which Trump had anything to do with

Trump is still a moron


Trump had a bit to do with DOW, but it's largely because a lot of his promises help businesses and many went up after he got elected due to that. But if Trump's promises don't come true, stocks will likely fall back down.


Yeah, I guess it's not fair to say he had nothing to do with it


The real question is how does the DOW being good actually help the average person in the US? The people who voted Trump for his promise on jobs aren't likely invested in the stock market and not reaping any immediate benefits from the stock market increase.


Seriously? How old are you?

Does anyone here own a house?

Have a 401k?

Invest in mutual funds?
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:14:01 PM
#22
Sanktu_Vyvorant posted...
BGleason22 posted...
The DOW is at record highs, real estate is booming.

Yeah, life is terrible.


Neither of which Trump had anything to do with

Trump is still a moron


So.... life is therefore terrible?

JIC you haven't had a chance to turn away from CNN or liberal blogs, or everyone telling you how terrible of a person the president is, things over here in the real world, where real people work for a living, invest, and do their best to provide for their family and retire early, are actually going pretty great.
TopicSo NFL higher ups are worried about fan backlash when it comes to Kaepernick
BGleason22
06/07/17 9:08:09 PM
#107
Calwyn posted...
AngelsNAirwav3s posted...
If Kaepernick didn't suck he would be meeting with more teams.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/2017-nfl-free-agent-qbs-colin-kaepernicks-jay-cutler-mark-sanchez-mike-glennon-brian-hoyer-geno-smith-032417
http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/quarterbacks-signed-before-colin-kaepernick-rumors-news-seahawks-contract/93i299p4us1a1frwfd0pltuc3

Look at all of the shitty-ass quarterbacks that got signed before Kaepernick even got a look from a team. Bryan Hoyer is awful. Josh McCown is awful. Mike Glennon is awful and got $15 million. Geno Smith, Kellen Moore, Chase Daniel, TJ Yates, Blaine Gabbert... even Mark Sanchez! MARK LITERALLY BUTTCHEZ SANCHEZ GOT SIGNED BEFORE COLIN KAEPERNICK!

BLL33

Seriously, look at that shit. If you think that Kaepernick isn't signed because he isn't good enough, that means you think every single one of these god-awful quarterbacks, including literally Buttchez, is better than him. And if you really think that, you're either delusional, ignorant, trolling, or all of the above.


All of these QBs except one can run a pro style offense. Guess which one.

Kaep has proven that he has no touch on his throws. He has one velocity, bullet. It's effective sometimes, and very ineffective others. He's great at the read option, but coaches around the league have that figured out. He's not great as a pocket passer.

The NFL has proven time and time again that they're not afraid to take on baggage with players, as long as they can contribute to help the team win.

You have to weigh the positives against the negatives, in this case, you simply can not make a case that the positives outweigh the negatives. They don't, that's why he doesn't have a contract.
TopicTrump is stupid.
BGleason22
06/07/17 8:54:18 PM
#10
The DOW is at record highs, real estate is booming.

Yeah, life is terrible.
Topicdo americans literally wear shoes in the house
BGleason22
06/01/17 11:01:02 PM
#16
Roxborough4Ever posted...
back and forth between Ontario, Ohio and Michigan and i can confirm Americans wear shoes in the house because they say the "floor is dirty"......well maybe if you swept your floors and mopped them they wouldn't be dirty



Or didn't wear your shoes inside, that tracked in all that shit, that made your floor filthy.

Trust me, it's not Americans, it's a class of Americans, and I agree, it's disgusting.
Topicdo americans literally wear shoes in the house
BGleason22
06/01/17 10:55:24 PM
#13
infinitydev2020 posted...
My mom does and she does it because her feet get dirty (like every other foot in history) and she doesn't like tracking it back to the bed.

Disgusting.

Your house must be filthy.

You could at the very least, tell her about this neat thing called a slipper.

Seriously, who tracks dirt into bed from inside their own house? Gross.
Topicdo americans literally wear shoes in the house
BGleason22
06/01/17 10:53:02 PM
#11
beacraft posted...
Yes we do.

No, "we" don't.

Backwards ass people probably do, I guess, if they think their feet will suddenly need protection, indoors....
TopicLMAO Donald Trump has everyone on his strings
BGleason22
05/31/17 10:54:58 PM
#15
Amputation posted...
Damn_Underscore posted...
covfefe

7 simple letters and no one can shut up about it


Uh, yeah, it's about how stupid he is. What an evil genius! Make everyone think you are dumb and secretly laugh to,yourself! Sure fooled us, Donald.

Trump: "hey everyone, I'm a fucking idiot!"

Everyone: "What an idiot."

Trump: "Ha! Sure trolled them!"


Doesn't that pretty much sum up CE?


Keith_Valentine posted...
It's to the point many people Want him to fail, even if it harms our country. And it is harming us. And they don't care, just so they can laugh at Trump.

Grown ups acting like hs bitches, smh


Exactly. The scary part is, it's almost as if nobody has thought through the best case scenario, if they do get their wish and Trump fails miserably.

What is the best case scenario?

The presidency isn't going to get handed over to the other party. The House isn't going to get handed over to the other party. The Senate isn't going to get handed over to the other party.

These dummies are actually helping their opposition. With Trump gone, the right will have a much higher chance of working together towards their common goals.
TopicHow can China keep the time the same everywhere in their country if the US cant
BGleason22
05/25/17 11:07:57 PM
#7
Who says the US can't?
Topic2 medium pizzas for $11.98 + $2.99 delivery fee. How much do you tip?
BGleason22
05/25/17 11:07:00 PM
#15
MrZAP17 posted...
Dat_Cracka_Jax posted...
That's what the delivery fee is for

It really is not. It's just a hidden fee that usually goes to the restaurant.

And I'd pay $3-4 and I wouldn't use a twenty. Having to separate your tip from the rest of the money can be a pain.


I'd give you 10-1 odds that the driver gets $2 per delivery.

Otherwise, who the hell would work delivery for a place that charges $3 per and you get nothing.
Topic2 medium pizzas for $11.98 + $2.99 delivery fee. How much do you tip?
BGleason22
05/25/17 11:03:45 PM
#12
If a place has a delivery fee, I won't tip.

I'm normally a generous tipper (20%) as a I worked as a bartender for a year, so I understand the struggle.

But fuck that delivery fee.
TopicNebraska has corn. Idaho has potatoes.
BGleason22
05/25/17 6:21:39 PM
#8
Wheat, Corn, Cessna and Learjet
TopicUS Bank increased my credit limit on my one card to $22,000.
BGleason22
05/23/17 9:21:05 PM
#27
Printerscape posted...
GAMER_X_REVIVAL posted...
US Bank is a real bank?? Where is it located??

https://www.usbank.com/


US Bank is the 5th largest in the US.

In fairness, the top 4: Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo, are fairly close in size, while the rest of the top 10 are a bit more regional.

US Bank is about 1/4 of the size of the top 4. Most of the branches are in the Midwest, but make no mistake, it's national.

https://www.usbankstadium.com <-Home of the Minnesota Vikings
TopicSubway ranked top sandwich shop in America
BGleason22
05/23/17 8:39:47 PM
#68
I don't think most of you understand what this poll is showing.

It's definitely not ranking Subway as the best sandwich shop.

It's showing which brands have the best perception of value rather then the actual value of the product.

Subway has a great deal of brand equity because nearly everyone has knowledge and experience with Subway. It doesn't mean it's better or worse then any of the competitors. It means it has better Marketing.
TopicThis 18 y/o CHRISTIAN Girl was BANNED from Graduation cause she's PREGNANT!!
BGleason22
05/22/17 10:11:21 PM
#26
MorbidFaithless posted...
WizardPowers posted...
"life is sacred"

"lmao you pregnant? fuck you bitch"

Christianity in a nutshell.


"Equality for everyone"
"You don't agree with my opinions? fuck you bitch"

2017 Democrats in a nutshell.
TopicFriend of mine got pulled over by a Cop and had his car searched. Tips please?
BGleason22
05/12/17 6:38:22 PM
#76
Romulox28 posted...
the reality is that you don't really have any rights, or at least you have them until the cop/legal system decides you don't or they can get away with violating these rights.

you can say you dont consent as much as you want but the cop can just say that your eyes looked a little red, he smelled weed in the car, thought the dog was indicating interest in the car etc and then you are getting your shit searched. ultimately the cop is getting what you want. if you take it to court, it's your word against his. you can record with your cell phone or whatever but what good will that do?


What right was violated?
TopicGot fired today. Forgot how boring unemployment can be.
BGleason22
05/12/17 6:28:44 PM
#41
ProfDE posted...
Just say that it was a policy violation since I'm pretty sure yelling at your supervisor is a violation of some policy you had at that job. Your previous employer is not allowed to give specifics on why you were fired.
.


Where are you getting this information? That is absolutely false. Legally, a former employer can divulge any information that they want (unless that information is confidential). Some companies may have policies that they don't divulge that information, but they absolutely can if they choose.

The very first question asked to a former employer is to describe the situation that lead to (name)'s departure. If they provide an answer that is anything other than 2 weeks notice, amicable split, I will immediately eliminate the candidate. I'm not alone.

MutantJohn posted...
Ha, they said they liked my passion and would give me a good recommendation. To be fair, me yelling was the only reportable incident in over a year and a half.


I'm going to have to call BS on this. I've heard that song and dance a million times, it's never been true.

Companies don't just fire someone that has been there for a year and half over one incident. It doesn't happen for numerous reasons - unemployment insurance, wrongful termination laws, training time commitments, etc.
TopicGot fired today. Forgot how boring unemployment can be.
BGleason22
05/11/17 9:04:22 PM
#37
southcoast09 posted...
MutantJohn posted...
Ryven posted...
Fired because of.....?

I didn't fit the company culture anymore.

I wound up yelling at my immediate supervisor when I found out we were going to be reading database data during update transactions. It's sometimes okay to do but in our case, we need the extra coherency and guarantees to help preserve the integrity of the system.

I also got sick and tired of the reluctance to move away from shitty ass JavaScript and I let my opinions be vocally known.

Isn't every job basically just doing what the boss says and biting your tongue when you know you could do it better?


If you never want to get ahead, sure.

If management isn't open to new ideas, leave. You're in a horrible company. That's assuming you're an asset.

To the TC, you are only screwing yourself over. It sounds like you like the industry and had spent some time at the particular company. Now, you're forced to either leave a big gap in your work history or you're taking your chance at a horrible recommendation to future employers. As someone who hires staff, I heavily rely on previous employment history and will ALWAYS reach out to previous employers for their opinions on potential hires.
TopicHow do you feel about football players getting CTE for your entertainment?
BGleason22
04/22/17 1:28:44 AM
#37
The case study, published in the International Journal of Pathology and Research and presented at the CCC's 5th annual symposium on Research on the Concussion Spectrum of Disorders, discusses the unexpected finding which resulted from an autopsy examining the brain of a patient with a seven-year history of clinically diagnosed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and motor neuron disease (MND), yet no history of head trauma or any participation in activities associated with risk of concussion, according to his family.

"The finding of CTE in an individual who not only had no known head trauma, but also showed no signs of dementia or cognitive impairment and was high functioning mentally until his death, highlights that the cause of CTE might be more complex than we assume," says Dr. Lili-Naz Hazrati, neuropathologist with the CCC research team who conducted the autopsy.

"So far, we have only seen this neurodegenerative disease in the brains of people with history of brain injury or multiple concussions, and we are not questioning that a relationship may exist between repetitive head trauma and brain degeneration," she continues. "But, at this point in time, we have more questions than answers about the definitive causes of CTE, and findings like these give us new directions to pursue and investigate."
TopicHow do you feel about football players getting CTE for your entertainment?
BGleason22
04/22/17 1:22:23 AM
#36
shockthemonkey posted...
HiddenRoar posted...
shockthemonkey posted...

Easy to say this when you're a kid who grew up once concussion knowledge was already hitting mainstream. Much harder to get all smug when you had been told your whole life that post-concussion syndrome was just acting like a p****. Either way, you're talking out of your ass if you think CTE knowledge is just common sense.


We may not have known the exact effects that stem from repeated concussions, but it's fucking dumb to think that we didn't know that there were negative consequences resulting from head injuries after, I dunno, two world wars and several other wars that lead a heap ton of folks coming home with them.

Concussions weren't treated as long term injuries before the turn of the century. Repeated non-concussive blows weren't even considered relevant. A lot of people suffering from CTE weren't even the people being hit or hitting their heads.


I'm calling BS. #1 as ancedotal evidence of myself you suffered multiple concussions in the late 80s and early 90s and they were considered extremely relevant at the time. Just because you didn't hear about it in main stream media (which didn't really exist at the time) until the 2000s doesn't mean it wasn't an issue.

#2 People have now been diagnosed with CTE without any known previous brain trauma or concussions, so our defintion of CTE is at this very moment, changing.

#3 It absolutely is common sense that trauma to your brain is not a good thing.... Let's stop acting like a light bulb went off in 2005 when ESPN started telling you that getting hit hard in the head was bad.
TopicRape victims should marry their rapists, Malaysian MP tells parliament
BGleason22
04/09/17 2:14:29 AM
#39
Waluigi7 posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Step 1 - Google: What states have banned sharia law

Step 2 - Google: (Insert states) 2016 presidential electoral results.

Step 3 - ????

Step 4 - Watch liberals heads explode. Find way to blame Trump/conservatives like everything else.

What is that supposed to prove?

Of course heavily religious states are going to have problems with other religions.


lol

:Boom:

What exactly qualifies a state as, in your words, "heavily religious"? Is North Dakota heavily religious? How about Canada, is Canada heavily relgious? What about the UK? France? Germany? Greece?

I can't believe this person is advocating Sharia law be acceptable.
TopicTrump is going to push N. Korea. What is going to happen.
BGleason22
04/09/17 1:57:23 AM
#12
Its either; worst case scenario, millions of lives in the south. Best case scenario, cut the head of the snake and limit casualties, today. Or the s***ty north contiunes to exist, and continues to attempt to acquire weapons of mass destruction, endangering 10s of millions in the near future.

Now what?
TopicWho do you think is the funniest comedian?
BGleason22
04/09/17 1:47:47 AM
#18
Dave Chappelle
TopicTrump to hopefully end Syrian crisis.
BGleason22
04/09/17 1:44:50 AM
#9
TC: Do you understand the situation in Syria? It's not an A vs. B scenario.

It's A vs. B vs. C vs. D with the Middle East backing B vs. D and Russian, Iran backing A vs. C and Turkey backing B vs. C while Hellzbolah backs D vs. A and Turkey trains C to fight D, etc. etc.

This is a cluster, we have operations training officers to fight the people that are being backed by our allies. We have Russians and Iranians promising to help our mid level enemies fight our high level enemies.

The US getting involved isn't going to solve things, it's just going to make the conflict larger.
TopicBlack girl accepted to 8 Ivy League schools. Affirmative Action or brilliance?
BGleason22
04/06/17 9:21:15 PM
#141
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/us/nd-teen-ivy-league-trnd/

All 8 ivy league schools + Stanford and MIT

Sorry if this has been posted, I'm not going to read 3 pages of "nah uh"
TopicMuslim teen writes #BlackLivesMatter 100 times on Stanford essay and gets in
BGleason22
04/05/17 11:43:02 PM
#106
Obstacle2 posted...
What does his religion have anything to do with this?

Quotas
TopicRape victims should marry their rapists, Malaysian MP tells parliament
BGleason22
04/05/17 11:26:05 PM
#33
Step 1 - Google: What states have banned sharia law

Step 2 - Google: (Insert states) 2016 presidential electoral results.

Step 3 - ????

Step 4 - Watch liberals heads explode. Find way to blame Trump/conservatives like everything else.
Topicwhat would you say is the most famous pro-wrestling match?
BGleason22
04/05/17 11:09:45 PM
#24
obsolete posted...
I would say Hogan vs Andre to the wrestling world and to wrestling fans is its the biggest moment. But Undertaker vs Mankind gets talked about even by people who don't watch wrestling.



Welp, there you go.

I think it's the exact opposite.
Topicwhat would you say is the most famous pro-wrestling match?
BGleason22
04/05/17 11:08:16 PM
#23
You guys greatly over estimate, in general, the interest people have in pro wrestling. Especially, if you're over the age of 25.


You want to talk about famous. You have to talk about the general public. It would have to be WMIII Hogan-Andre.

An insanely high percentage, just don't care. like in the 99.999999999 percentile.

You want to talk about the most famous match among fans, that's a different story.
Board List
Page List: 1, 2