| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Joe Rogan doctor thinks COVID deaths were premeditated to force vaccinations |
| COVxy 02/08/22 3:05:27 PM #13 | On a side note: everytime I see a video from this person, I'm baffled by the set up. It seems like it's primarily 3 people who are on zoom, not talking mostly, while someone who is not present on the zoom talks to them? Why is this set up this way? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 2:55:50 PM #111 | PatrickMahomes posted... Exactly. Which is why I'm baffled as to the number of times I see people who stray from the script (which says "stop") get assaulted for insinuating that it doesn't stop while still acknowledging and accepting the benefits that the vaccines actually offer. Did you just quote a section of my post on misunderstanding only to misunderstand my point deliberately? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 2:40:54 PM #108 | PatrickMahomes posted... He said it does not stop you from getting sick or spreading. He never explicitly disagreed with the fact that they reduce illness or transmission. He literally said "hinder transmission". On top of that, this point about "stop" is stupid. It's at best a misunderstanding, but moreover it seems like a deliberate attempt to squeeze in a statement to suggest that the vaccine does nothing. It does stop it, some of the time. No vaccine does what you are implying this one should. And you are underestimating what reducing the transmissability and infection rate would do given a fully vaccinated population. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Feminists: Free the nipple! |
| COVxy 02/08/22 2:12:04 PM #28 | clyde_frog posted... As a straight man, I would get roasted into oblivion by the very same people purporting body positivity if I posted lude content on my social media. It would completely sabotage my social standing with friends as well. Its just an interesting topic to observe and hypothesize about. Lmao. Apparently thirst-traps aren't a thing. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Feminists: Free the nipple! |
| COVxy 02/08/22 2:06:56 PM #24 | spikethedevil posted... I think unsolicited dick pics are a much more wide spread issue hence the focus. Seems pretty obvious. TC, why are you so mad about this? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 1:28:07 PM #98 | PatrickMahomes posted... ...Where exactly is the "misinformation" in that post? The vaccine reduces transmission and reduces probability of getting the infection. Both things he explicitly said it does not do. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 1:02:23 PM #89 | PatrickMahomes posted... Typical. There is literally nothing wrong with his post. Probably got hit for some similar non-rule-breaking post because it goes against the groupthink. Spreading covid misinformation is deeply immoral. In other words, shut the fuck up. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 12:53:47 PM #83 | Raptornado posted... https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/02/monkey-study-casts-doubt-on-need-for-an-omicron-specific-booster/ Moreover, it's pretty clear that having a booster protects pretty well against omicron. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 12:24:28 PM #73 | MutantJohn posted... I actually am a leftist myself https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/7/4/AAZt-XAAC5wq.jpg --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 12:13:52 PM #70 | MutantJohn posted... you get called an anti-science anti-vaxx loon When the shoe fits lol. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/08/22 12:06:36 PM #23 | Yeah, I defended in 2019. Been at a postdoc position since. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | College enrollment continues to slide as free tuition and loan forgiveness stall |
| COVxy 02/08/22 11:36:52 AM #18 | Dat_Cracka_Jax posted... Regardless, It's what it has been turned into That's really up to the student. There's a slight shift in curriculum over time only because of student demands. But, by and large, that has nothing to do with what university "is". --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | College enrollment continues to slide as free tuition and loan forgiveness stall |
| COVxy 02/08/22 11:00:37 AM #15 | Dat_Cracka_Jax posted... I thought most people went to college to get a job that the want That's never been the goal of higher education. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | California ending mask mandate |
| COVxy 02/08/22 10:57:07 AM #51 | MutantJohn posted... Mandating a vaccine that doesn't hinder transmissibility nor stop the illness is morally wrong. Neither of those things are true about the vaccine. Jesus fucking christ how is this a post that is still up. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | College enrollment continues to slide as free tuition and loan forgiveness stall |
| COVxy 02/08/22 10:46:49 AM #10 | Cobra1010 posted... College/universities is not the best way to go. If i ran a country, i would encourage apprenticeships. Theres no better way than to learn on the job, all whist getting paid. Experience > words on paper. Perhaps the point of learning has less to do with creating workers than you think? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/08/22 9:33:17 AM #21 | Zanzenburger posted... Yeah, social sciences are different. You basically need to submit a near-perfect paper or no one will take you. So I mean, I think a lot of people would say the same about the sciences, but what this is showing is that initial submissions and final published papers are effectively the same. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | *smears feces all over GameFaqs walls* |
| COVxy 02/07/22 9:44:31 PM #9 | Looking like my freshman dorm building in here. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | I have almost finished Deadly Premonition. Is Twin Peaks a good show to watch if |
| COVxy 02/07/22 8:37:40 PM #5 | Twin Peaks is good if you think shitty low budget 80's-90's crime shows are so weird they are actually avant-garde. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 7:40:58 PM #91 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] Again, the conclusion is the same, therefore it is not malicious. The only reason to believe it is malicious is if you believe the conclusion about Joe Rogan is different. Do you believe that? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 7:33:02 PM #88 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] It's not malicious if the conclusion is the same. Do you think the conclusion is different? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 7:28:05 PM #86 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] That's exactly what I say. But because it's the same conclusion, I can't bring myself to give a fuck that CNN called it horse dewormer. So, again, why do you? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | CNN hires author of "Liberal Fascism" |
| COVxy 02/07/22 7:19:17 PM #5 | Gotta be "balanced"! --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 7:17:45 PM #84 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] The conclusion that Joe Rogan took a dangerous and ineffective round of medication because all of his conservative buddies told him to. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:59:35 PM #81 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] Yeah, but the lie has no consequence. Other than allowing people to more quicky get to the same correct conclusion. So, why do you care? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:53:50 PM #77 | COVxy posted... But it wouldn't matter either way. Shit's dangerous and ineffective either way, prescribed or not. Just as stupid if he got it from an animal feed store or his celebrity physician. Again, the only reason you're so deadset about this is because you think the detail matters. Why do you think the detail matters? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:45:47 PM #69 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] But it wouldn't matter either way. Shit's dangerous and ineffective either way, prescribed or not. Just as stupid if he got it from an animal feed store or his celebrity physician. The only reason to spend time arguing like this is to indirectly rehabilitate the argument about whether ivermectin is a good alternative. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:40:05 PM #64 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] Why was it useful? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:35:26 PM #60 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] But does that matter, for the core point of the story? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:34:35 PM #18 | Hurr. Go away, adults are discussing. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:29:22 PM #57 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] What was the point of that statement? You wrote it bro. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:23:35 PM #52 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] Which has nothing to do with its application to covid. Which you know. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 6:22:42 PM #16 | So preprint here refers to an article uploaded onto a preprint server prior to sending it out to a journal. Looks like you seem to be referring to preprints as accepted manuscripts prior to copy editing, but that's different. Likely preprints aren't common in your field (they aren't super common in social sciences, but getting more common in some fields), which is likely why you're unfamiliar (if you are, i could have misread). I think, for the vast majority of cases, what people put up on preprint is usually their honest go at working towards a scientific problem. And for the most part, that's not all that different from what gets published. Really, the publishing system is vestigial from the days prior to the internet. The only reason it's kept around is because hiring committees, grant committees, etc, don't have a clue how they would "objectively" evaluate people without counting the number of CNS papers an applicant has or summing up the impact factor of all their pubs. Like, it's really not an exaggeration to state that this is the only reason anyone is publishing in journals at this point. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Joe Rogan, on vaccines (3/10/2020) |
| COVxy 02/07/22 5:41:18 PM #42 | The horse dewormer comment is just fucking completely unimportant. It's a dig, that's all. Of course there are human versions. Who the fuck cares? But importantly, it doesn't fucking work for covid. And there's no reason to legitimize the discussion at this point. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 5:38:11 PM #14 | Peer review doesn't do too much good. Certainly makes the process of science slower, and translates often a subjective element into one that feels more objective (published, or not). --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | what's a recent scientific discovery |
| COVxy 02/07/22 5:35:28 PM #25 | Smackems posted... Fit better than anything you've added Don't know why you're being aggressive about it. This topic is about scientific discoveries that changed the way we view the world. Those are very rare, particularly now-a-days. Science is extremely incremental. I can't even really think of one off the top of my head for my own field of study. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | what's a recent scientific discovery |
| COVxy 02/07/22 4:30:49 PM #20 | ThyCorndog posted... Confirming that our math was correct with real tangible results is pretty important. It means we weren't full of shit I'm not saying they aren't important, of course they are. They just don't fit the prompt. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | what's a recent scientific discovery |
| COVxy 02/07/22 4:29:04 PM #18 | Gravitational waves and higgs-boson explicitly don't count because they were predicted for decades by theory to exist, no? It would be something like finding strong evidence that those things don't exist. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | what's a recent scientific discovery |
| COVxy 02/07/22 4:09:50 PM #5 | These things mostly don't happen. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 2:52:54 PM #13 | Up --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 2:07:10 PM #12 | DarkRoast posted... https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2772743 Publishing can take years from first submission to acceptance. That statistic doesn't mean what you think it means. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 1:59:55 PM #9 | DarkRoast posted... Pre-prints are not peer-reviewed, therefore they haven't been formally accepted by the Journal Yes, i do know this. Thank you doctor. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 1:57:35 PM #7 | DarkRoast posted... 80% of pre-prints are ultimately rejected from publication: That's not what that statistic means. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 1:54:34 PM #5 | DarkRoast posted... Most important statistic is the one he didn't post, which is how many preprints actually make it to print I really don't think that's much of anything to consider though. The proportion is likely extremely small. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Scientific preprints don't change much after peer review |
| COVxy 02/07/22 1:51:03 PM #1 | https://twitter.com/blekhman/status/1490415664728666113?t=ep_YvHdapDV0nXQucnZgYQ&s=19 Not surprising, but cool people are doing the work. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Jim Breuer delivers the most cogent argument in defense of Joe Rogan. |
| COVxy 02/07/22 1:03:53 PM #44 | trappedunderice posted... I'm not right wing https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/7/3/AAZt-XAAC5il.jpg --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Jim Breuer delivers the most cogent argument in defense of Joe Rogan. |
| COVxy 02/07/22 11:32:48 AM #17 | https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/1/9/AAZt-XAAC5hv.jpg --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Turns on random Naruto episode. Sees naked zombie kids and a lollipop sword guy |
| COVxy 02/06/22 11:16:31 PM #5 | atmasabr posted... A lot of anime series are like that. I got spoiled by Pokemon. Lmao. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Topic | Your David Lynch rankings |
| COVxy 02/06/22 8:27:45 PM #2 | Any other movie > David Lynch movie. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] |
| Board List |