| Board List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Why do they call it circumcision instead of male genitalia mutilation? |
| MasahiroSakrai 11/30/18 1:34:45 AM #189 | DrCidd posted... I think your girlfriend is the exception. I've never heard otherwise until you claimed it. I think your claim is incorrect since the person who is saying you are wrong actually has the genitalia you claim is benefiting. If you even have any experience to back it up rather than just a random claim with pseudo-science backbone, then I'd say your experience is the exception. --- Sakurai: (Laughs) |
| Topic | Why do they call it circumcision instead of male genitalia mutilation? |
| MasahiroSakrai 11/30/18 12:00:48 AM #186 | DrCidd posted... There's also the fact that nobody here has mentioned. Sex with a uncircumcised penis is better for women, because the gliding action of the foreskin acts as a mechanical lubricant. IE, no lube necessary for regular sex. I remembered my girlfriend being pleased that I am cut from early in our relationship, so I asked her about this specifically. She said that it's exactly the opposite of what you've said. The "gliding action" is exactly what makes the uncut penis feels worse. She described uncut as "sort of feeling like they always have a condom on, even when they don't." That having been said, I've never required lube during regular sex, nor have I ever been with a girl who has told me she preferred uncut. Not that any of this is much of an argument - it is just personal experience after all. It's just odd to hear about someone else's claims being so much different from the realities that I've experienced. --- Sakurai: (Laughs) |
| Board List | Page List: 1 |