Lurker > SomeonesAlt

Your hand can't get pregnant, Hoth
---

But Whose?

http://www.phillyvoice.com/phub-search-red-vs-blue/

Of **** top five cuck states, three were red (West Virginia, which led the search list; New Hampshire and Alabama), one blue (Vermont) and one somewhere in between (Kentucky).

Of **** bottom five cuck states, three were red (Oklahoma, Nebraska and South Dakota) while two were blue (California and Hawaii).

When you crunch the numbers of all red states vs. blue states (strong or leaning), it seems that users in red states are more inclined to search for cuck videos. Overall, on average, it was the 26th most popular search in red states while in blue states, it came in 29th. So, glass houses and all that, I guess.

---

But Whose?

Antifar posted...

Are you familiar with the Qanon shit? It's lol

Vaguely, I remember some poster on here making a topic about it and calling it the Q storm or something. Isn't he supposedly an FBI agent who posts on /pol/and informs them that Mueller is actually after Hillary Clinton?
---

But Whose?

https://mobile.twitter.com/jetblue/status/991724300712341504

Read some of the comments, lmao. Cultists are seriously unhinged. Apparently that Q person implicated Jet Blue or some nonsense

https://mobile.twitter.com/Buddhists4POTUS/status/993114739067715585

https://mobile.twitter.com/RepublicKermit/status/992618606608486401

https://mobile.twitter.com/cheetah_071/status/992492742977753088
---

But Whose?

RoboLaserGandhi posted...

Dagon_0 posted...

Right wingers are really into this stuff for some reason.

Where did this myth come from?

It's easily a liberal man's fetish. Some things really are straightforward. It's not like everything has a hidden motive.

I wouldn't say right wingers, but it's definitely a favorite of redneck Trump supporters
---

But Whose?

Gay people have the perfect answer to this
---

But Whose?

@Muffinz0rz
---

But Whose?

DifferentialEquation posted...

One of the fifth amendment's basic functions is to protect innocent men who might otherwise be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances.

---

But Whose?

Antifar posted...

The catch here is that no one will believe she isn't one.

Lmao, she'll start having conversations with people and out come the pitchforks and anti AI people
---

But Whose?

Neither of those are actually cucked because neither you, nor that guy was ever with the girl in each example.
---

But Whose?

I'm sure that the majority of people who have to deal with you feel exactly the same way.
---

But Whose?

Tyranthraxus posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Would hillary plead the fifth in regard to her emails? I think that's far more important to discuss than anything involving trump.

Hillary already testified about her emails and Benghazi for 11 hours without a lawyer.

Machete was mocking the type of people who would respond seriously. Kind of like the person who responded to you above me, lmao.
---

But Whose?

FLUFFYGERM posted...

wow wtf.

so i reached out to Bio with a genuine offer to help out if he's going through some money issues or etc, because he clearly has some issue that he's going through. and he reported my PM as abusive lmao. welcome to my ignore list, dude. legitimately the most toxic and hateful person i've encountered on CE.

That's called being a condescending dick. Bio never said he needed help, was rather douchey of you to PM him and then advertise that PM here.
---

But Whose?

Pepys Monster posted...

Muffinz0rz: The millennial who can't be separated from his phone ever because it gives him anxiety.

LMAO at Pepys Monster calling anyone else a gimmick with his topics
---

But Whose?

Phantom_Nook posted...

https://mobile.twitter.com/ColinKahl/status/993000884169666561

According to this story, in May of last year, Team Trump asked an Israeli intel firm to dig up dirt on me as part of an effort to discredit the Iran deal.

Tonight, as my wife read this story, that date triggered a very creepy memory.

Last year, my wife was serving on the fundraising committee of my daughter's public charter school in DC. One day, out of the blue, she received an email from someone claiming to represent a socially responsible private equity firm in the UK.

This "UK person" said "she" was flying to DC soon and wanted to have coffee with my wife to discuss the possibility of including my daughter's school in their educational fund network.

This was not a generic "Nigerian prince" scam. This person had all sorts of specific information on my wife's volunteer duties at an obscure DC elementary school.

There was a website for the firm (which no longer exists, by the way), but it had no depth to it, and there was no detailed information about the "UK person" who reached out to my wife.

My wife shared the email with me and a few people we know in both the finance and education fields. All agreed that the entire scenario seemed implausible and seemed like an approach by a foreign intelligence entity.

To test the implausibility, my wife kept trying to encourage the "UK person" over email to meet with other school fundraising officers & leadership while "she" was in DC, providing relevant contact info. But the "UK person" kept insisting that "she" had to meet with my wife.

At that point, my wife stopped corresponding.

This all happened in late May and early June of last year.

Perhaps it was just a coincidence that this obvious scam targeting my family had all the hallmarks of an intel op and coincided with Team Trump's reported efforts to "dig up dirt" on me.

But the fact that I even have to think about the possibility that my family was targeted by people working for the President is yet another sign of the fundamental degradation of our country that Trump has produced.

Wow, that definitely lends credence to this
---

But Whose?

Hoth is starting to use these to impersonate people apparently
---

But Whose?

Antifar posted...

Trump did not start that

Like I've said before, the wedge was placed there during other presidents, but Trump has been smashing it in with a sledgehammer
---

But Whose?

Conflict posted...

RainblowDash posted...

As you age, you start to see the truth of things.

Brony and racist? Man, that's a pussy-slaying combination if I've ever seen one.

Lmao
---

But Whose?

twitterfriends posted...

Watch him come anyways because Trump is so petty like that.

I could see Trump being a dick, crashing the funeral and making it all about him.
---

But Whose?

ScarIetess posted...

I didn't realize I was that hated.

You're not. Hoth is just an awful human being
---

But Whose?

Hoth alt :P
---

But Whose?

DifferentialEquation posted...

Bio1590 posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

"He's not a war hero. He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured."

How exactly does this make Trump anti-military? He criticized one person. If you criticize a doctor that committed malpractice, that doesn't make you anti-medicine.

This is a bad post even for your shitty gimmick.

You know I'm right. Criticizing an individual doesn't mean you're against their entire industry/profession. That's just absurd.

He's shitting on ALL prisoners of war. You know that, seriously, there's places you shouldn't bring your gimmick.
---

But Whose?

What'd you do?
---

But Whose?

Seems most people agree that he's a shit president, but not the worst.
---

But Whose?

Trump is a shit president, no question, but he'll probably go down as more of a joke than anything that actually hurt America. History books will treat him as the bumbling idiot who never should have been given power.
---

But Whose?

southcoast09 posted...

this guy is an evil piece of shit who hides behind his inherited military status.

Oh and this is blatantly false to the point of insult

McCain was given the opportunity to leave his torture camp early BECAUSE of his inherited military status and declined to stay with his men.

Do you really think the coward you support who ran away from service citing bone spurs that he forgot which leg they were in would do such a thing?
---

But Whose?

southcoast09 posted...

SomeonesAlt posted...

Caution999 posted...

Like Trump would even bother showing up to his funeral anyway. McCain is a traitor to this country.

How can you possibly justify this nonsense?

Uhh maybe because he stabbed his political party in the back and allowed Obamacare to continue killing people?? Maybe the fact that he gave info to the Vietnamese that got Americans killed? Duuhhhhhhhh

Im sorry, but this guy is an evil piece of shit who hides behind his inherited military status.

Source needed for the Vietnam thing. There was a conspiracy, but I have yet to see any reputable sources confirm its veracity.
Caution999 posted...

Its rumored he has sold weapons to terrorist and I believe he has

Any source for these rumors?
---

But Whose?

shockthemonkey posted...

Sounds like Trump, has this been confirmed yet?

No. It just broke, and currently the Observer through the Guardian is the only one covering it.
---

But Whose?

Caution999 posted...

Like Trump would even bother showing up to his funeral anyway. McCain is a traitor to this country.

How can you possibly justify this nonsense?
---

But Whose?

looked posted...

Did he actually says this?

---

But Whose?

UnfairRepresent posted...

SomeonesAlt posted...

Also wouldn't making up something like this go much farther than that brand of fake news?

Yeah probably.

I'm not disputing the story I'm just saying going "It's not fake news, it's the Guardian!" is like going "It's not fake news! It's CNN!"

Just implies you've never read the Guardian and don't know about it's reputation

I have read random stories posted from the Guardian here and there, but I didn't realize it was regarded as fake news.
---

But Whose?

UnfairRepresent posted...

I don't know about fact check websites but I used to work for the Guardian and trust me, they're not awful but....

Well let's just say if you think CNN is fake news then you can't throw stones at the Guardian.

Saying they have a "Center-left bias" is putting it mildly, they will flat out leave out important information just to push a story. It's a politically motivated paper.

How about the Observer, their sister paper? This was reported directly from them.

Also wouldn't making up something like this go much farther than that brand of fake news?
---

But Whose?

UnfairRepresent posted...

SomeonesAlt posted...

The Guardian
do not report fake news.

Errrrr

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: The Guardian is a daily newspaper from the United Kingdom. The Guardian freely admits they are a center-left newspaper. Reports factually, but with a left-center bias in reporting and sometimes wording. (5/18/2016)
---

But Whose?

I think at the very least, Congress should take the decision of the Iran deal out of Trump's hands. This is blatant corruption.
---

But Whose?

Before sources get called into question, The Guardian and Observer trend left, but do not report fake news.
---

But Whose?

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/05/trump-team-hired-spy-firm-dirty-ops-iran-nuclear-deal

Uhhh, this is straight Nixon shit if true. Story just broke, so unable to find anywhere else yet, but a lot of people are retweeting it.
---

But Whose?

eggcorn posted...

Roshon posted...

glitteringfairy posted...

Waste of tax payer money, resources, and time?

Millions of tax payers for sure want this investigation to continue though.

millions don't.

More want it to keep going than want it to stop.
---

But Whose?

Imagine being a Trump supporter and mocking an actual war hero while slurping down everything a draft dodging coward says.
---

But Whose?

RE_expert44 posted...

So they were only supposed to be here temporarily and they end up staying for 20 years? Couldn't they have gone through the naturalization process in that time?

Maybe they tried? I dunno, immigration isn't nearly as easy as people seem to think.
---

But Whose?

If you get lucky enough to have an exit row available, snag that shit
---

But Whose?

Fucking scumbag who did that. Hope she recovers
---

But Whose?

Capn Circus posted...

SomeonesAlt posted...

In a DHS statement, Nielsen said that she is delaying the effective date for termination of TPS for Hondurans for 18 months, until Jan. 5, 2020.

So it'll be in effect about two weeks?

Trump leaves office in 2021

Yeah, that was a brain fart, lol. I fucked up
---

But Whose?

In a DHS statement, Nielsen said that she is delaying the effective date for termination of TPS for Hondurans for 18 months, until Jan. 5, 2020.

So it'll be in effect about two weeks?
---

But Whose?