Lurker > Mackorov

DevsBro posted...

Boycotting in a nutshell: you shouldn't buy this product but I'm going to.

many people just buy a game on steam, play for less than an hour, then write some stupid negative review before refunding it. I didn't know you can judge games that easily but it sure skews the scores to such absurd lengths.

BignutzisBack posted...

PC is a dying platform, don't pay any attention to those nerds

shush, you don't want to be called out as a 'peasant'. The only insult PC gamers know anyway

I should probably post this on the PC board. But the minute I do that, I'll instantly be labelled as a 'troll' and called out for 'troll bait' since that's how sensitive, illogical and too far up their ass the PC community is.

CircleOfManias posted...

Because a "bad PC port" just means it's not up to PC standards, since even the worst PC ports are far superior to their console counterparts.

yeah, if you consider bad stuttering throughout gameplay and crashes as superior to console counterparts that play normally.

oh but granted, given how self-entitled and nitpicky certain PC gamers are, these are probably peeps that tried maxing out the game with too high settings then later complain about FPS drops from their glorious 200 fps to 100 fps like it's the end of the world and the game is suddenly unplayable to them.

'PC Master Race' they say.
'Best graphics of them all' they like to boast.

Yet for most AAA games that come out, I see more people instead complaining about optimization issues, lag or bad porting.
Then there's many who swear not to buy games from publishers like Ubisoft, EA or Activision, thinking it'll make a difference like real haha, which is very amusing considering these are the only top few publishers that are behind most AAA games in the market. AAA games with demanding graphics actually worth playing with that stupid expensive gaming rig of yours.

Why even have such a beastly gaming rig if the only games you can be proud of playing are cheap-ass indie games with outdated graphics? Why even bother showing off your powerful amazing gaming rig if the games aren't optimized for PC anyway?

It's pretty much normal to have like 90% of negative steam reviews these days be due to some irrelevant technical fault than anything to do with the game itself. It's becoming a very sad trend and yet people continue with this hilarious 'Master Race' idea.

And to get this straight, I'm not even a console gamer. I never play on consoles, only on PC. But this is something just so stupid I find amazing how people still keep up with this 'PC is superior' mindset.

I don't know how much the anime will cover but if they follow through with the manga's ending, prepare to be somewhat disappointed... the manga author never explains about the power origins and just ends off with some boring meteorite sidestory haiz

Vortex_of_Hope posted...

It was worth for Astro boy and old man kung fu already. The number of one piece call outs it weird though.

the manga author is known for his tendency to referencing One Piece, even though he admits he hates the series. The same author for Gantz btw

St0rmFury posted...

Funkydog posted...

Marvel know how to make a good, fun film.

Yea... after they failed with the first 2 Thor movies though.

not according to RT.
reason not to take RT seriously. They're all a bunch of Marvel wannabes at this point. In case you people don't realize, the critics at RT are always the same people. What do you expect then?

Gamer99z posted...

pres_madagascar posted...

The majority of the negatives seem to be technical issues.

I thought technical issues we're just a feature of Ubisoft games? At least the open world ones.

Meanwhile the buggiest game ever, Skyrim, gets a 9-10. The hypocrisy of GS never fails to surprise me. They're even worse than IGN. If they were any more popular, they'd probably be recognised as such

It's funny but I've never once seen a single poster on CE try to make a defensive argument on their stance on lax gun laws.
All I see are ''haha butthurt'' , ''<insert meme>'', ''you <insert mockery term>'', ''haha bait topic'', ''<insert another irrelevant comment>''

explain your logic of 'guns don't kill people' then. Go on.

according to that dumbshit logic, maybe we should give all citizens missile launchers, grenades, Apache helicopters with 10,000 rounds rapid-fire gatling guns too cos after all, these are all harmless weapons.

It's ok, right? Cos it aint these weapons' fault.

It all depends on who's wielding them, right?

Hey, let's give this bazooka to that mentally stable average-looking peaceful-loving person. Nothing can go wrong, cos he's not mentally ill or anything!

Grenades don't kill people, bruh. Nukes don't kill people, bruh.

''Look mama, I'm holding this M60 50-inch machinegun! But don't be afraid! Guns don't kill people, remember! Only people kill people. And I won't kill you, I promise!''

what amazing logic you guys have.

scorpion41 posted...

That_Happened posted...

gamer167 posted...

Oh God please don't tell me Jimmy the Crybaby was tearing up on national television again

scorpion41 posted...

Lol hard to believe he was part of The Man Show...what a whiner.

It's not weakness to show emotion about people dying.

It is when you start crying about gun laws instead of asking what makes a person want to do shit like that.

The only crybabies I see here are people whining about gun control just so they won't lose their rights to their precious guns. Also even funnier that these people don't even seem to realize the bill the Democrats are proposing dont even affect their stupid right to bear arms.

Darkman124 posted...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/las-vegas-isis-shooting-claims-stephen-paddock-responsibility-latest-a7978941.html

Isis also claimed the gunman "converted to Islam several months ago", without providing more details. Paddock's religion and lifestyle have not yet emerged elsewhere.

The wording of the release is similar to other attacks that have been inspired, rather than directed, by Isis.

Paddock's alleged suicide would also differ from the actions of the vast majority of Isis attackers, who seek to be "martyred" in bombings or by security forces, suggesting he had little, if any, guidance from the group.

not actually sure what they hope to accomplish by claiming every sociopath who decides to take some people with them is one of theirs

is it srsly not obvious to you? ISIS does this to every big massacre. It expands their infleunce and make it sound like they're a bigger threat.
More importantly it accelerates Islamophobia and Muslim hate, which in turn gives them more new members from Muslims converting to their radical beliefs

just play it if you wanna release some killing tendencies

for self-defense, right? cos a pistol ain't enough to defend you from bad people and s***. Gotta load dem big guns and tot them around.

I'm sure gun nuts wont mind advocating for civilians carrying missile launchers, bazookas and flamethrowers as well

None of them are attractive.

So I choose 0