Lurker > WBC_Injury

Oh no.

Anyway.

They make up names for everything nowadays. People can't just live and let live anymore.

It's been a tough week for Xbots after the Activision deal was blocked.

Homie you know it always starts like this and ends with people needling you into a massive meltdown over time

So, like...maybe avoid that part and help yourself out?

WBC_Injury is a textbook example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

He's an idiot who thinks he's smart and EVERYONE ELSE is the stupid one.

This is crazy.

America never politicizes anything, I can't believe other countries do.

God dammit Kanjo can you just not be a weirdo just once, you'd be able to keep an account that way

Why do you insist on arguing with people all day

it's like you read my mind and preemptively responded to yourself on my behalf. i love it.

Bzzt wrong.

Deep faking porn of a real person should be illegal regardless of age. It's demonstrably proven to cause harm in the few cases where it's already happened.

Think about it. Even if it was purely AI generated, it's still something that is designed to evoke arousal from children being presented in a sexual manner.

That when you legislate ick you get shitty things like marginalization of groups that fall into social and sexual minorities. Just like how homosexuality was largely illegal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

i'm not. i'm attacking your logical fallacy.

that's not what's going on at all. maybe you should come in and re-read what you're flipping out about before you make anymore ridiculously ignorant posts

I gave you good faith responses in the other topic, and in this topic up until now. But you are just trying to distort my words because you feel bad about talking out of your ass in the other topic and doubling down on it, so I owe you no more responses.

Stating that it does that is not testing if it does that. If there's any evidence that animated porn increases the likelihood of offense, i'd love to see it. That would provide the only rational argument for legislating it.

...lol. clearly just wasting my time now.

That when you legislate ick you get shitty things like marginalization of groups that fall into social and sexual minorities. Just like how homosexuality was largely illegal.

There have been many studies on season of birth and personality, mental health, and brain properties!

The law should be designed to protect from harm, not ick.

I mean, let's take piracy as an example. Let's say you illegally download a movie and then copy it to two locations on your hard drive. Should you be charged with multiple counts of piracy?

Seems stupid, tbh. At best this is attempting to double charge someone for a single crime. Suppose that's standard for these kinds of crimes, but really should be considered unconstitutional (well, not sure about canada's law system).

that cultivates a favorable impression from coworkers, other government officials, agency customers and the general public

Not only is astrology explicitly about star position and birth, making it unrelated to developmental patterns due to season of birth, the types of claims that astrology makes about personality don't align at all with what people observe in terms of seasonality. You literally burst into a topic to talk about something entirely different under the guise of defending astrology as valid and are upset when people didn't pretend like everyone was talking about the same thing.

I had already gone through the topic and understand exactly what you were claiming. Did you read my earlier post in this topic to you? Your point was stupid and the only reason you are standing by it is stubborness.

You made a stupid point. Move on instead of quadrupling down.

Imagine believing in astrology and calling OTHER people stupid.