Board List | |
---|---|
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:07:13 PM #212 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Well except you literally do have the ability to report a post which is why I said it. you can report any post, but you cant see the post of the person who blocked you so you cannot report THAT post --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 10:52:57 PM #207 | Gremlynn posted... why do i care what they care about? their blocked. their ability to care is no longer relevant to me. im saying it doesnt deter them, and as @Baha05 pointed out it can pose other issues such as bullies making it impossible for you to report them. Overall it causes more harm than good. Mr_hulk88 posted... Good news is you don't need to "think" anything. People in support of the feature are actually speaking from experience. people who call this feature terrible can also speak from experience. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 9:49:38 PM #203 | kirbymuncher posted... but then they can't post? i just dont think troublesome users care enough. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:56:21 PM #197 | kirbymuncher posted... I know you're making a big point of how people can log out and still read your posts also, the reason why this is brought up a lot by me in particular is in because other topics people always tell me and other people if you are logging out to view someones posts then you are not using the blocking feature the way it is; you are NOT SUPPOSED to log out and view these posts. this is such an idiotic statement to me that Im not sure why people are bringing it up. if im not supposed to log out and see someones posts, the site SHOULDNT ALLOW you to log out like this in the first place. I brought up an analogy of you arresting people and sending them to jail, then leaving the key accessible for them to unlock themselves out of jail because I felt like this is what these people are saying they would do, instead of keeping the key to themselves. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:36:30 PM #195 | Mr_hulk88 posted... 1. NO THEY CANT. YOU BLOCKING SOMEONE MEANS THEY CANT TROLL YOU. they know you blocked them so they can block you in return. By just ignoring, its not easy to find out you put them on ignore --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:30:29 PM #192 | kirbymuncher posted... I know you're making a big point of how people can log out and still read your posts but like... even after a theoretical troll does this and reads your posts, how are they supposed to do anything? If they log back in to start trolling they can't post in the topic, and they obviously can't post while logged out either. it prevents trolls from trolling in your topic which is good, but it allows them to troll you in other ways and you cant report them especially if they block you. you are also just leaving other people to deal with the trolls. it overall makes people not want to create an account as they can just read boards as a guest, which means they have to deal with the trolls that you arent reporting. an ignore feature by itself is an incentive to make an account so you can have an ignore list, blocking makes you prefer guest more because this way you are immune to blocking. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:19:54 PM #188 | Gremlynn posted... or he can just block them. you sound like somebody desperate to know what info the people who blocked you might have let slip ir blocking is just ineffective at making trolls stop trolling. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:18:03 PM #187 | Gremlynn posted... What trouble? makes people less like to make an account as they can just read the majority of the site as guests more, encourages more throwaway accounts that never post, this system is open to people blocking you and others to avoid tos violations, people are more likely to abandon accounts that are old, promotes trolls blocking people who expose them, and is overall a tool weaponized by trolls to degrade the experience of other users or to gatekeep topics via a personal echo chamber. It is a hot mess and the cons outweigh the benefits as the staff have stated years ago --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:10:20 PM #183 | Tmaster148 posted... I've had some unhinged users stalk me from a game board to harass me in unrelated topics. So the block feature is good at keeping people from just invading your topics with unrelated shit. cant you just report and ignore them? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 7:59:05 PM #180 | Sharashaska posted... Why does the block feature fucking bother you that much? because it doesnt make sense for a gaming forum and the admins argued against it in the past so idk why they suddenly decided to do a 180 --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 7:37:17 PM #175 | Mr_hulk88 posted... People can report literally any post they want, you loser. Shut the fuck up already. not if theyre logged as a guest they could also choose to block everyone in addition to you and prevent dozens of people from reporting a post. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 7:18:05 PM #173 | VampireCoyote posted... If youre someone that complains about the block feature youre likely one of the reasons that it exists or if youre someone who complains about there being no block feature on a PUBLIC site where you CANNOT BLOCK guest users from browsing your posts in the sections youre posting (this means current events isnt one) then maybe you want the feature so you can write tos violations about people and block them from reporting your posts --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 5:52:42 PM #165 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] why do you care so much about weirdos reading your topic? if you dont want them reading your topic, maybe you shouldnt be posting in a PUBLIC FORUM --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 4:36:17 PM #163 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] must be because blocking on a public website such as gamefaqs is a dumb idea, it serves more problems than it solves, and all the times people suggested blocking as a site feature in the past, the admins shut it down because it would cause more problems than it solves. orher sites such as the super mario boards and smashboards dont have a block feature that prevents people from seeing your posts because these sites are viewable by guests anyways, and any attempts to bring this up would probably be shutdown for the same reasons as to why the admins shutdown it in the past. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 4:20:26 PM #160 | Mr_hulk88 posted... ? Ignored users can post in your topics. that was a suggested change in case I didnt make it clear enough --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 4:00:43 PM #157 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Because it's not about reading, it's about them not responding to what you say. BalloonBattle05 posted... why didnt the ignore feature go far enough? did you miss this part? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 3:59:30 PM #156 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] must be because this topic was created entirely because I gave a response that someone who you block can still log out and read your posts on public boards especially if you post tos violations about them and people gave an oxymoron response of you shouldnt log out to view someones posts if they blocked you which is why I came up with that putting someone in jail analogy. If logging out isnt supposed to be used to bypass someone blocking you from reading their posts, you shouldnt be able to read posts from anyone in the first place. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 3:23:45 PM #154 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] why didnt the ignore feature go far enough? allowing ignored users to read your topics (especially if you are going to abuse it yourself to post tos violations about them) but not post in them is ok with me, but no one here seems to want that --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 3:08:15 PM #148 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] because everyone makes it sound like they can easily find someones alt and block them when they dont know the alts username when that alt is never used to post --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 3:03:28 PM #146 | Mr_hulk88 posted... And they would also get blocked aNyWaYSssss. how do you block them when you dont know the username? [LFAQs-redacted-quote] how do you know they are looking at your posts or topic if you cant see anything they post yourself? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 2:42:57 PM #143 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] is this a jab at why blocking causes more trouble than its worth or is it why should we have blocking? either way, other users tell me that blocking causes more problems than its worth as there is little incentive to sign up for an account if you just want to read when browsing as guest, and people who want to read private boards such as current events likely have an alt they only use for reading anyways. If they get banned on their main, they already have an alt to use. Other internet forums such as the super mario boards and smashboards dont have this kind of blocking system either and their forums are mostly public so I want to know why gamefaqs should have one --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 1:51:41 PM #139 | Fluttershy posted... that's another thing, the people who have you blocked have been unaware of you ever since, but you've been stewing about them and making posts about them, like this. they call that 'rent-free' living, i believe. [LFAQs-redacted-quote] The ignore feature does just that, prevent you from seeing their posts it doesnt prevent them from seeing and commentating on your posts, but how do you know they are doing it and why do you care if you cant see them to begin with? sull56ivan2010 posted... Now you're taking it too far with this paranoia you've been having the last couple days. You're going to extreme lengths to be against the block feature. the entire point of this topic being made was that people always argue that you shouldnt be logging out to see the persons posts while being ignorant of the fact that youre literally giving the key to seeing the persons posts anyways which is what the jail analogy is literally describing. if you dont want people who you blocked to see your public posts, maybe guests without an account shouldnt be able to read them either (but I dont think gamefaqs wants that) Tyranthraxus posted... No they can't though. That's the thing. My house is an ironclad fortress that repels assholes and it's also patrolled by Superman and he also thinks they're an asshole. people could just get in by breaking a window or something they would deserve to be arrested but thats not the point. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 12:03:25 PM #130 | Tyranthraxus posted... When you block someone they don't have a "key" to make you unblock them. they can easily break into your house especially since they know where you live --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:55:40 AM #128 | Fluttershy posted... it doesnt do its job to begin with lets say you throw someone in jail and the jail cell has the key for them to get out, or they can get out by digging a hole using a shovel. Are you going to say that putting them in jail served a purpose, they just chose to circumvent being arrested or are you going to remove both of them because there is no point in putting them in jail otherwise? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:51:16 AM #127 | Mr_hulk88 posted... ...What is wrong with you??? I havent tested this myself but I tried entering through a link on a friends account and it still had the post new message button --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:49:25 AM #125 | Fluttershy posted... if you can just log out so there is no point in it preventing people from reading posts made from you. Let me put it this way that I dont care at all about having to log out and read posts but this is EXACTLY WHY it should be removed, because it doesnt do its job to begin with Mr_hulk88 posted... The ignore feature is what makes no sense. if you cant see someones posts then you cant engage with them anyways. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:38:28 AM #122 | Fluttershy posted... It makes a huge difference aNywAyS. So much so that here you are complaining about its existence. im saying that the system of it NOT LETTING YOU VIEW COMMENTS AND TOPICS DOESNT WORK IN PUBLIC BOARDS (of which CE isnt one) if you can just log out so there is no point in it preventing people from reading posts made from you. Even if they wanted to view boards in private mode, they could just make a new account. everyone should just argue that it should be changed to allow viewing your topics but not posting in them and I would be ok with that. Fluttershy posted... they can make a post in other threads. You are not banning them from posting on gamefaqs they can view them with a link but Im not sure if theyre actually prevented from posting. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:23:32 AM #113 | Fluttershy posted... im saying that its barely any effort enough that it makes no difference anyways. they can make a post in other threads. You are not banning them from posting on gamefaqs --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:20:40 AM #111 | Fluttershy posted... might be more effort im saying that its barely any effort enough that it makes no difference anyways. ironically, if someone blocks you, makes a post that violates the TOS and you see it while logged out, it would take you more effort to make other people report it than it would be for someone to log out. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:05:09 AM #102 | Fluttershy posted... it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. Fluttershy posted... it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. Fluttershy posted... it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. Fluttershy posted... it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. Fluttershy posted... it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. might be more effort but its still barely a huge difference. they cannot post but they probably dont care or can just use an alt. if you dont want people engaging you in a PUBLIC FORM, maybe you shouldnt be using the form in the first place --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 11:00:35 AM #101 | Ryvell posted... Why haven't you addressed the numerous people pointing out that you can't view CE while logged out? I acknowledged the private boards thing multiple times, of which CE is one. which should be an argument for it only applying to private boards. Tyranthraxus posted... They can't post either. Which is the real point of doing it. Why does preventing people from posting in your topics matter to you so much? Do you complain that youtubes blocking feature doesnt allow you to prevent people from commenting on your videos? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 10:58:44 AM #100 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Blocking people from reading yours is too. I ACKNOWLEDGED PRIVATE BOARDS, OF WHICH CE IS ONE read the outside of private boards section. Why do you care so much if people read your posts after you block them? GameFAQs should just have a only friends can see your posts (like facebook) if you CARE THAT MUCH ABOUT ONLY CERTAIN PEOPLE ENGAGING WITH YOU --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 10:53:12 AM #96 | Fluttershy posted... there being ways around the system probably means the system is a bigger hinderance (or doesnt serve its purpose well) than it helps it barely takes any effort to log out and view boards as a guest, and anyone that dedicated could just use private mode solely for reading purposes. Mr_hulk88 posted... Lol I feel this needs repositng i would be making these topics EVEN IF no one was blocking me, because it serves no actual purpose outside of people blocking you so you cant report them breaking the rules. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 10:28:17 AM #90 | Fluttershy posted... you could just stay logged out entirely or use a different computer where youre not logged in if you just want to view posts. blocking posts you dont want to read is perfectly fine, this is what the ignore function is for. blocking someone from reading topics you make cannot be done because outside of private boards, they could just log out and view your posts. there being ways around the system probably means the system is a bigger hinderance (or doesnt serve its purpose well) than it helps and opens up loopholes regarding bullying and harassment where someone can block you and then post tos violations that nobody reports either because they were blocked as well or they side with the violator. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 9:54:52 AM #88 | Jerry_Hellyeah posted... Who has made multiple accounts to harass what other user? I dont think anyone actually has, but Reddits blocking feature originally prevented you from seeing peoples posts but they could see yours (like the ignore feature here). I asked why it doesnt work the way facebook does once and the response was that they found it pointless because you could just log out and see the posts of whoever blocked you. Reddit also told me that trolls who are blocked could just make a new account and continue to harass you while putting them on ignore list is way less obvious that you are blocking them so it doesnt really do a good job of combating trolls. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 9:47:15 AM #86 | VeggetaX posted... I'm just kidding it isn't. blocking someone just makes it obvious that you blocked them, they barely have any hints if you just have them on ignore list. If someone is really that dedicated to harassing you they could just make multiple alts. ignoring does a better job of dealing with trolls and harassment because its less obvious to them which is why I want to know why is blocking so important that people dont want others to make comments on their PUBLIC posts in a PUBLIC message board, as opposed as to just not seeing the posts of the person who you blocked. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 9:01:06 AM #83 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] you could just stay logged out entirely or use a different computer where youre not logged in if you just want to view posts. as for private boards such as CE, you could just make a lurker account and not read posts. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:50:46 AM #81 | VeggetaX posted... Logging out takes a lot of effort. how does it? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:44:20 AM #77 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] it barely takes any effort to just log out. I doubt there would be a difference between people who do so vs people who dont. if I was in charge of implementing a blocking feature, because I felt like it would hardly be a convincing reason for me to add it. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:30:42 AM #74 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] because outside of private boards, you cant prevent people from logging out to view your posts. you CAN prevent them from posting by blocking, but the question is why does this particular feature matter so much if putting someone on ignore list and simply not seeing their posts to begin with is often enough for many people? Its like wanting to block specific people from liking your youtube videos or subscribing to your channel. Why does this particular feature on a PUBLIC BOARD matter to you so much? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:20:27 AM #71 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] you cannot post in someones topic if they block you, but any trolls would probably just use an alt if they really wanted to. the question was to make a scenario where if blocking didnt exist and you used the ignore button to not see someones posts in your topics, how would you know they posted in the topic if you cant see their posts to begin with? additionally, why do you care so much about preventing people from posting in your topics especially if they make dozens of alts to post in them? are you the type to complain that you cannot block specific people from viewing and liking your youtube videos or subscribing to your channel? If yes, why does this function matter to you so much? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:11:35 AM #67 | Smallville posted... tc, haven't you made this exact same topic on like 5 different boards? why are you so mad at the blocking feature? i like it. Is it because a lot of people use it, on you, and you don't like that? not a single person could block me and Id still want the feature removed because it clearly causes more harm than good especially for people who just want to read topics. It wouldnt change anything. this topic on ce was to question why people use dont log out to view someones posts if they blocked you as a defence when this is LITERALLY giving them the key to unlock themselves out of jail --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 8:04:39 AM #64 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] on PUBLIC boards theres nothing stopping them from logging out and reading your topics as a guest. the question was say you ignore someone and you cant see their posts. If they post in your topics afterwards, why do you care if you cant read them to begin with? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 7:58:20 AM #62 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote] how would you know we are participating if you cant read our posts? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 7:55:08 AM #60 | Mr_hulk88 posted... ..you . Can't. Post. On. The. Topic. Of. Someone. Who. Blocked. You the reason why I made this topic was to question everyone who says dont log out to view the posts of someone who blocked you and disregard the fact that this is the equivalent of putting someone in jail, letting them gain access to the key for them to get out of jail and telling them dont unlock yourself out of jail. If you DONT WANT people to unlock themselves out of jail, DONT PROVIDE THEM THE KEY TO DO SO IN THE FIRST PLACE. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 1:16:01 AM #57 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Lol that link is clearly talking about the IGNORE feature not blocking, the user who made that thread simply doesn't seem to know that "ignore" isn't blocking https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/2-message-board-help/80412042 this link is about blocking --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 1:15:46 AM #56 | sull56ivan2010 posted... You've made four topics in the last 48 hours on four different boards, TC. Block feature is here to stay. It works its purpose the way it intended to. That's why it was implemented. it works its purpose of blocking users from commentating on your posts, but causes other issues and its purpose of not letting people see your PUBLIC posts is immediately thrown out the window when they can just view as a guest. It also causes issues of you blocking people to avoid them reporting your TOS violations. you know why youtubes blocking doesnt prevent you from viewing someones videos? Its because you can just log out and view the video as a guest. maybe blocking shouldve just allowed you to view the persons topics but your comments wouldnt be visible to anyone, logged in or not. This wouldve served more purpose to it with less controversy. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 12:36:59 AM #52 | pikakaeru posted... well youre wrong. also you cant post in topics where you are ignoring the TC that guys topic implied it wasnt a feature anyways but it looks like they implemented it now. @OverloadBurner everyone seems to argue that blocking is necessary for preventing trolls from derailing your topics. Have any input? https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/2-message-board-help/80412042 --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 12:18:07 AM #48 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Facepalm. wording of this implies it doesnt, and this topic implies it doesnt either https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/7-site-suggestions/80393906 Blocking both ignores a user, and silently causes them to ignore you. In addition to you no longer seeing any of their posts, they will not see your posts while browsing any message board or topic (although they may still show up in the site-wide Popular Topics lists, and they will be able to see posts in which you are quoted), although any other content you post will still be available. --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Topic | Why do people defend the blocking feature on gamefaqs? |
BalloonBattle05 04/16/23 12:01:00 AM #46 | Mr_hulk88 posted... Once again: The ignore feature doesn't prevent the person from engaging what you say. it doesnt prevent them from engaging, but you likely dont know that they are engaging in the topic in the first place because you cant see them to begin with. If other users engage with them you can just mark them for trolling. dozens of people say that blocking someone means you cant see their posts (such as @comicfire) and they dont mention anything else so this is the only impression Im getting from them. I dont think blocking a troll prevents them from seeing topics you create anyways, so your topics can STILL be derailed if they can log out and see your posts. TheMikh posted... because there's a number of mean-spirited or otherwise deranged personalities that stalk and harass other users while working within the ToU, and i have no problem with blocking these kinds of personalities when i notice such behavioral patterns targeted towards myself or others why cant you report them for harassment? --- If locking online play behind a paywall with irrelevant games is a service then bricking your phone and not removing the brick without a fee is also a service. |
Board List |