Lurker > zzeennoolloo

Cheater87 posted...

I thought this was the game.

^THIS.
I seriously thought this was about the Destiny video game series and I was wondering what the hell went down that caused the video games to become banned from Twitter. LOL. But apparently it's about another Destiny that I have a zero clue about.

Are cheat codes allowed?
While not every game has cheat codes, some do like level select and invincibility.
Are those allowed?
Something like Superman 64 should be allowed codes since that game is pretty broken in the worse way possible to begin with.
Even if no codes are allowed, I would still try to beat all N-64 games.
Some will take a while (Superman 64. You actually have to play on the hardest difficulty to beat that game. It won't let you play the final level if you aren't playing on hard. Even on easy this game is hard because of how broken this game is), but I would definitely do it for $700,000,000.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/4/6/AAMsTmAADsSm.jpg

littlebro07 posted...

Damn, Ive been scrolling through the replies for awhile and cant find a single response in support of what he said lol

Surprised he hasnt deleted this

I can't imagine anyone being in support of what he's saying.
Especially when one becomes aware that the severe student loan problem is exclusive to the United States. College is FREE in the majority of other countries and in some of the other countries that do charge money, they only charge a reasonable amount which won't put it's students into eternal debt. The U.S is the only country that's going to the extreme by putting it's students in drowning debt (which obviously isn't good for the future of the U.S for several reasons). Would be nice if all high school guidance counselors in general in the U.S would make this information more well known to students and their parents, but the vast majority of them don't for whatever reasons.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/9/0/AAMsTmAADsQK.jpg

NOTE:
That $75,772 amount use to be the average.
It's MUCH higher now.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/9/1/AAMsTmAADsQL.png

SavageGlum100 posted...

There are a few Youtube mini-documentaries on The Guy Game talking about the controversy of the game and other behind the scenes chaos that happened.
With that said...
Interesting fact from one of the Youtube video documentaries I saw a few years back:
When "THE girl" (the one who made this video game illegal and the only video game in history to be the first and only game officially banned from retail stores in the United States) gets on stage during her part of the game (it's ironically during the final set of levels in the game during the end. She's literally one of the "FINAL BOSSES" of the game) and the host asked her age, she jokingly replies with the word "SHIT !!". She laughs and he laughs... but then he puts the microphone back on her so she can seriously answer the question and she then claims she is 21 (and behind the scenes she showed them a fake I.D that showed she was 21 to the point where her bio in the game says she is 21). Um... about that... she was NOT 21. LMAO. She's the reason this game is illegal (she was only 17 at the time).

PRO TIP # 1
If you ask a woman her age and she replies with the word "SHIT !!" and then claims she is 21 after a brief awkward pause, she most likely is NOT 21. LMAO.
PRO TIP # 2
If you buy a video game and one of the final bosses gets asked her age and she says "SHIT !!" and then claims she is 21 after a brief awkward pause, you need to shut off the console, take the disc out, and smash that shit disc with a hammer because she is most likely NOT 21.
It's also a very definite way to defeat the final boss. LOL.

Well..
Holy shit...
This is easily the most dangerous final boss in the history of video games.
People brag about the toughness of final bosses in games like Elden Ring, classic SNK Neo Geo fighting games (SNK Boss Syndrome), Bloodborne, Mike Tyson with his NES difficulty at the end of Mike Tyson's Punch Out, etc, etc, etc, but dude... this final boss from the Guy Game is so dangerous one could end up in mother fucking PRISON because of this final boss!!!
I know people like a challenge, but I feel the difficulty level of this final boss from the Guy Game is too damn extreme. This is super ultra nightmare difficulty where the final boss could end up getting an assist from this guy right here below who comes wandering into the player's kitchen.... asking the player to have a seat:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/0/2/8/AAFUswAADl_M.jpg

Hell...
If one survives that first phase of that boss fight, the second phase of that Guy Game final boss might result in the final boss getting an assist from these guys below bursting into the player's home, asking them to "OPEN UP!!!" before they come crashing through the front door and storming in:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/8/1/AAMsTmAADsQB.jpg

Damn.
I officially declare the final boss of the Guy Game to be the most dangerous final boss of all of gaming!!

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Die Hard

GameGodOfAll posted...

We have a winner.

While I greatly enjoyed the first three Die Hard films, I feel 1 > 3 > 2 for them is an accurate ranking for those movies.
Same goes with the first three Highlander films: 1 > 3 > 2 (even though the big difference here is that while I love 1 and very much like 3, I absolutely hated Highlander 2. Granted, I think 95% of everyone hated Highlander 2 (it was so bad it was officially thrown out of continuity from the rest of the Highlander series by the creators and producers and is considered an alternate timeline). Granted, the Renegade cut of Highlander 2 helps it greatly and is a huge improvement over the original bullshit theatrical release and makes it into a somewhat competent movie... sort of / kind of...).

Gobstoppers12 posted...

https://casapalmera.com/blog/tips-for-living-with-a-bpd-partner/

https://psychcentral.com/blog/wellness/2012/01/emotional-abuse-and-your-partner-with-bpd#1

https://www.lawcullen.com/blog/2018/10/borderline-personality-disorder-and-the-abusive-partner/

https://mhmatters.com/emotionally-abusive-borderline-relationships/

https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/personality-disorders/expert-q-and-a

Some of the commonly referenced symptoms include things like "chaotic interpersonal relationships," "inappropriate, intense anger," and "reckless and extreme behaviors"

It's literally a recognized symptom of BPD to be abusive and unreasonable in personal relationships.

Excellent post! To add on to this, just to post a small sample of info below from the "Very Well Mind" website:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/7/3/AAMsTmAADNtN.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/7/4/AAMsTmAADNtO.jpg

Neoconkers posted...

"all the stories anyone's told me about BPD relationships were about how they went badly wrong!"

yeah because "I had a generally OK relationship with a functional person" isn't a story, is it

Everyone, including myself, in this topic who has actually had to deal with someone with BPD in real life in regards to a close relationship (whether it was an ex-girlfriend or a relative) has the same common denominator: the relationship turned into a shit show of very fucked up and vicious proportions due to the BPD viciously getting out of control. All of us in this topic who had a personal real life horror story about someone in our lives with BPD (try reading this entire topic, you will find several) gave our personal experiences and if you notice NOT one of us had a happy ending.

We all simply gave the TC our personal experience and let the TC decide on whether to go out on a date with this woman. If you read the entire topic you would have seen that TC cancelled the date. Honestly, I personally feel that the TC did the right thing as they could have been walking into an extremely shitty experience that would have fucked them up in several ways, even in a very permanent way. I personally feel that the best thing for the TC right now is to try to find someone else who will offer them a healthy relationship.

I know some people don't find it politically correct that we are talking about our experiences with someone with BPD, but for fucks sake, we all decided to tell our stories as a fucking WARNING to the TC and for damn good reasons. Ultimately, it's up to the TC. They already cancelled the date. If they reverse their decision, obviously there is nothing me or anyone else who gave their stories can do about it. It's the TC's decision and maybe... just MAYBE... things might turn out for the good. However, in the event things do get viciously chaotic (and they most likely will, especially when the "Honeymoon" period of the first few weeks of the relationship are over) ALL of us gave our WARNINGS throughout this topic... can't say we didn't try to warn them.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

That's true, but the risk is significantly elevated when BPD is involved.

^THIS. The chances of something going horrendously wrong are greatly, significantly elevated beyond belief when BPD is factored in.

Chesh posted...

My sister has BPD and abused my mom and I horribly for years making me want to kill myself daily for years afterward and gave me tons of issues. I only recently recovered from it all. Tread VERY CAREFULLY here.

Caution should definitely be taken. There are a lot of real life horror stories out there. I have some of my own regarding my ex who has BPD. Things could get very bad without warning in the quickest and most vicious way possible.

daftpunk_mk5 posted...

Hit and quit.

The nice thing about BPD is the splitting... you're either the best person in the world or the worst. So after you hook up then ghost her, she's going to think you're the devil and wont want anything to do with you.

It is strongly advisable to NOT pull a "hit it and quit it and ghost" act on someone with BPD. Depending on how far they are on the BPD slider, if you have sex with them and drop them immediately, this will send them into a very EXTREMELY VIOLENT RAGE and you better fucking believe they will hunt your ass down and do who knows what to you and / or your private property. Emotionally messing with someone with BPD is a terrible idea that can backfire on you in a very violent way. Do NOT do it (and that goes for anyone else reading this, don't even attempt to do something like that) and just leave them the hell alone. Also, in the event something goes wrong while having sex and you get them pregnant, you are going to have one hell of a nasty problem on your hands when they start demanding child support and they start getting a lawyer involved.

Hoodroar posted...

Does literally anyone have a good experience dating someone with BPD to counter the negative anecdotes?

Like we have people saying, "this was terrible" and other people saying, "well you don't know if it's always terrible" and it's just a meaningless point. People refuse to date others over much less severe red flags.

CRON posted...

This is what frustrates me. I've personally never seen any instance of people having a good or even remotely positive story involving being in a relationship with someone suffering from BPD.

The discourse, at least these days, always seems to be between people who have been victims of abuse, and people dismissing it as "ahem, you're generalizing. Not everyone with BPD is an abuser".

I don't want people to be abused. I don't want people to fall victim to manipulation tactics and suffer.

Honestly, the best you are going to get is people like myself and others (I think Gobs said this earlier in the topic) where 60% of the time she was the most wonderful thing ever, but the other 40% she was Satan. I would put my personal experience at a slightly different percentage. 75% of the time she was the greatest and most kindest person I have ever known. However, 25% of the time she was the damn Devil and did some truly horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE things. While 25% of the time might not sound like a lot, it is when that 25% makes you feel like a lobster being dipped into 300 degree boiling water. It's bad. REALLY bad.

To put this in video game terms (since this is primarily a video game website), pick your favorite game or one of your favorite games of all time (Elden Ring, Mario 64, Final Fantasy 7, whatever). Imagine if 75% of the time you were allowed to play your favorite game... you are going to be in a great mood and be very happy, obviously. But imagine if the other 25% of the time your console / PC / portable / whatever decides to NOT let you play your game and instead decides to threaten to erase your save file, proceeds to ELECTROCUTE you, starts shooting feces at you, starts cursing you the fuck out while it threatens to smoother you with a pillow over your face while you sleep, and pull a bunch of other shit that makes the computer from 2001 Space Odyssey look like a Care Bear in comparison. Yeah, it's only happening 25 times out of 100, but it's still pretty fucking severe.

Now, is what I'm saying anecdotal? Yes, I don't have hard statistics that I threw together using hard data and a statistics computer program to back up what I'm saying. However, to paraphrase an old story, if someone asks 10 people if they should go into a town and almost all those people start screaming warnings while telling their personal experiences with that town and saying there is some horrible shit that they personally experienced in that town, it would be very wise to NOT ignore those stories and take them into very strong consideration on whether one should be entering that town or turning the car around and trying to go somewhere else.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/6/4/6/AAMsTmAADKjO.jpg

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


The word "movement" has become associated with the organization. It would have been better to word it as "idea" (NOT use the word "movement") and also to explain the difference between the idea and organization (which are two very different things. See all of post # 57 for details) in the opening post of this topic to provide extra clarity so there is no confusion (or at the very least to greatly minimize confusion). Also, splitting up the "no" option in this poll severely made this poll even more confusing and inaccurate. Should have just been "yes" and "no" as the only two options with a hell of a lot of clarity in the opening post about the difference between the idea and the organization.

lord0fmud posted...

The problem is there is no difference between the organization and the movement. If the American heart association was caught embezzling money I could give money to a different organization that helps fund research for heart disease.

So I think this poll was very poorly worded. Because it doesn't say whether it is the movement or the organization.

I don't see how anybody could be against the police using less excessive force.

That's the thing that's been causing a lot of unnecessary arguments with people for the last two years.
When people are saying they don't support BLM, 99% of them are NOT referring to the idea (the idea is perfectly fine and the vast majority of people support it), they are referring to the organization (they are fucked up and have been pulling a lot of bullshit. See BOTH videos below to see what I mean). The problem is that the name of the organization creates huge amounts of confusion and huge amounts of miscommunication and when someone says they don't support BLM they are referring to the organization (99% of them are in support of the idea, it's the organization that most have a problem with), but because of the name, some people automatically think they are hating on the idea (when that's not the case) resulting in one side thinking the other side is some ultra alt-righter (when that's not the case) and the other side thinking the others are some crazy alt-leftist (when that's not the case either). Miscommunication ends up running wild and you have two groups of people screaming at each other when in reality they actually support the same thing... the idea.

The IDEA of BLM is a GOOD thing.
But the people running the organization who are using the name BLM are NOT a good thing.

These two videos below (the first one is ONE minute and the second video is a little less than 4 minutes) perfectly sums up why a lot of people are pissed off that the BLM organization (NOT the idea... but the organization).
The idea is perfectly fine, but there needs to be another organization or better leaders or some type of other alternative because right now the people in charge are fucking everything up and making things so much worse for everyone. They didn't solve anything, they just fucked everything up and are making things so much worse. See videos below (both are super short but get the points across perfectly) to see what I mean:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbFpdYk-KrM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC0ArHkohvQ

The_REAL_Duke_O posted...

^THIS above.
And THIS below...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/4/2/AAaYD_AADKQa.png

and also THIS:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/4/3/AAaYD_AADKQb.png

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/4/4/AAaYD_AADKQc.png

^THIS.

cjsdowg posted...

I support the movement hate the organization. They are a griffters building castles from the blood the dead black men.

Sexypwnstar posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79994897/964486605
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/4/3/0/AAZZY5AADKQO.png

^All THIS.

angeleyes94 posted...

Especially after all the damage to minority business and towns caused by the blm riots. Blm ain't it.

^VERY much THIS.
With this video below to show how accurate this is. There are hundreds of similar videos related to this, but this one minute video below sums it up perfectly. It's only one minute long, but she speaks volumes of truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbFpdYk-KrM

AwesomeFawful posted...

Shadow the Hedgehog wasn't that bad.

^THIS.
I actually enjoyed Shadow's game.

The FAQs = Hell yes!!
The codes = Yes!!
The reviews = Yes!!
The forums = I feel like the forums should be quarantined in a biohazard box and put in a government warehouse next to Jimmy Hoffa's body and next to ALF and ALF's room and should never be spoken of ever again. LOL

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Yes, her name is Maria Bondarko (she's a famous instagram model) and she just turned 22 years old. She currently lives in Belarus (I don't recommend going there right now. LOL. Granted, for her, I would be willing to sneak in, Metal Gear Solid style). She is 5'5 tall, she is about 120 pounds, and she has a sense of humor!

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/7/2/AAMsTmAADCTg.jpg

To put this in perspective...
Asking what's the difference between VR for $35 and VR for $300 is like asking what's the difference between a $20 modern re-release of a Tiger Electronics portable game (in case you are wondering, yes, someone re-released those abominations this decade) and a $300 Nintendo Switch. THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE between a modern day $20 Tiger portable and a $300 Nintendo Switch!!!!

I own THREE VR headsets...

1) PS VR (which is mid-tier in quality)

2) HP Reverb G2 Windows Mixed Reality VR headset for PC (which is extremely high in quality).

3) Google Cardboard (which fucking SUCKS!!! It sucks ASS!!!)

With that said, yes, there is a HUGE difference between the cheap ass "VR" for $35 like Google Cardboard and mid-tier VR headsets like PS VR and especially high end VR headsets for PC.

Long story short, with Google Cardboard, which is literally fucking CARDBOARD, You put your cellphone into fucking CARDBOARD!!! Aside from being embarrassing, the quality of what you are seeing sucks ass compared to an actual real VR headset (for the PC VR headset I own, everything looks real and lifelike to the point where you feel like everything you are seeing is happening for real, unlike the shit Google cardboard where even in "VR" mode you still feel like you have a cellphone wrapped in cardboard strapped to your face and nothing feels real.

The old saying "You get what you pay for" applies here.
So yes, there is a HUGE difference between $35 VR and $300 VR.

Jen0125 posted...

And I felt personally attacked and confused by that

Stars that were born in 2001:

Born June 2001, Tik Tok Star Lexi Rivera (current age: 20)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/4/AAMsTmAAC_rk.jpg

Also...

Born December 2001, Pop star Billie Ellish (current age: 20)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/5/AAMsTmAAC_rl.jpg

Also...

Born October 2001, TV star (Girls Meets World, Snow Piercer, etc, etc) Rowan Blanchard (current age: 20)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/6/AAMsTmAAC_rm.jpg

Also...

Born August 2001, Tik Tok star Leilani Green (current age: 20)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/2/7/AAMsTmAAC_rn.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/9/5/AAMsTmAAC_KT.jpg

^ That last pic of that last alien looks scary as fuck... what horror movie is that thing from? Oh... wait a minute....

toadfan64 posted...

This site was definitely more fun back in the day. Now you have to walk on eggshells to joke and it's like 1000% more political, which gets old.

@toadfan64

You perfectly summed up why this website has been dying, especially during 2020 and 2021 when politics got out of control. The account I'm using now was created during December 2005, however I had been silently lurking on this website years before that. Everything was a lot more fun PRE-2020 on this site. Once 2020 hit, things on this site started getting bad and many users started permanently leaving because if you have to walk on eggshells on freaking message boards then there is no point to using message boards. A lot of other users have said in various topics that they have been moderated far more during the last two years than they have during the rest of their 10 + year history on this website. That's not good. I've also been noticing A LOT more "GameFAQs user ______ has been SUSPENDED" topics lately. Shit like that permanently drove a lot of people away from using this site.

ColdOne666 posted...

This is a blatant lie.

^THIS.
And that's the reason why this website has been losing tons of users. Especially when rules got very strict starting 2020 and more strict during 2021.