Lurker > blackpanther59

dave_is_slick posted...

Don't use words you don't know. Answer the question. You're proud to be a pedo. Why?

keep strawmanning. I know what strawman means, and I know what you are doing.

dave_is_slick posted...

We get it, you're proud to be a pedo. Why?

keep strawmanning.

dave_is_slick posted...

Doesn't matter. It's a difference without a distinction.

you're RIGHT! legally

there is no difference between being attracted to pubescent minors and little kids if you dont act on it

seems this acknowledgement is something people won't respect, because they think they can predict a slippery slope

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Appeal to motive. You are grasping at straws here.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

"damage control"

what damage am i controlling?

you are using an appeal to motive fallacy
dave_is_slick posted...

Meanwhile you're a literal pedo.

according to the other dude i'm a literal "ephebophile"

which one is it?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

What's your point? I pointed out what laws are.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

strawman. i never said it was okay. keep trying to put words in my mouth

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

well i made other posts but they go outside this thead

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

"this stuff"

lol

all i did was point out laws. you and everyone else are only proving my point.

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

Yeah I am not wasting my time having this conversation, you do not need this explained to you. Go bullshit with someone else MAP.

Nice cop out btw.

You were desperate to trick people into thinkng attractions to minors is a crime, and to leverage that into an argument, and threaten feds.

But it failed. and you know it so you bailed.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

damn, you replied real fast. i'm flattered you find me so important.

thanks for replying so fast as well. means so much BRO

Giant_Aspirin posted...

the only thing sadder than posting on gamefaqs.gamespot.com is trolling on gamefaqs.gamespot.com

The only thing sadder than being an ephebophile is being a pedophile.

This is the same principles of your argument. Lesser of two evils is pathetic.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

right, it's not ilegal but it's definitely creepy as fuck. but i know you know this and you're only saying that stuff because you know it riles people up. get a life.

>get a life
>posts on gamefaqs

lmao

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

Yeah I am not wasting my time having this conversation, you do not need this explained to you. Go bullshit with someone else MAP.

Yeah I don't. Law says acting on attraction = illegal, mere thought is not a crime.

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

There is no defending this, youre a MAP and exposed yourself.

you just said something about crime, and now you're backpedalling

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

No you admit you see no crime in being attracted to underage children who cant consent. Not many people other then a MAP would be saying such shit.

No, there literally is no crime, the crime comes in acting on the attraction. Otherwise it would be thought crime.

coolpal23 posted...

better say goodbye to this account

i cant believe you said that, unreal

If pointing out technicalities of laws causes me to lose an account I'll just laugh it off.

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

I am glad your exposing yourself, will make this so much easier for the feds and the mods when this is used as evidence against you.

Dream on, no rules or laws were broken. I pointed out mere facts.

nfearurspecimn posted...

do you also "but acktually it's ephebophilia" too?

strawman

CE_gonna_CE posted...

1) I dont have feelings

lol sure you don't
CE_gonna_CE posted...

2) This is also a top quality CE post

Pointing out reality is a top quality CE post.

Seems to be the formula.

Imagine caring about some tweet.

chrono625 posted...

wow

CE_gonna_CE posted...

that sure is a post alright

You do realize being attracted to minors isn't even remotely a crime? It doesn't matter if it hurts your feelings.

So 50 year old men are buying a 15 year old's pics and the 18 year old fan ends up killed.

lilORANG posted...

Why can't her adult brain control her teenage parts?

Ridiculous. Teenagers can't consent to sex because of brain development, so if they had adult brains, they should easily have self control.

Strider102 posted...

Why is she so incredibly stupid and why are her parents not doing their job as parents?

It's called money. People do stupid things for money.

This has only happened for thousands of years.

Patreon has this stuff a ton apparently. It's like onlyfans for teens.

Imagine if it was a grown man how people would respond.

Oral, anal or vaginal

kissing or groping is erotic but not sex.

Punished_Blinx posted...

I know you're referring to prison here (I think?) but a motto really shouldn't need a lot of context to not sound horrible.

Most mottos should just sound horrible?

Questionmarktarius posted...

Ronnie McDowell had the right idea all along
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIIon1S1Das

Yeah because the average gamefaqs user has the ability to bang college age women but just turns it down because of moral qualms.

Letron_James posted...

I'm aware of it, would never even sleep with a girl under the age of 21 tbh. Even 21 is too young. Nothing is attractive about the not being able to talk about anything or be with someone who is inexperienced, it over experienced at that age for that matter.

Yeah I'm sure you have 18-21 year olds throwing themselves at you all the time.

Gamerguymass posted...

I think it's more a red flag or creepy that America is so obsessed with the number 18 that it's probably should be considered brainwashing at this point. As has already been brought up, the majority of states in America already have an aoc under 18. Not to mention just about every first world nation has it younger then 18 as well with many being even younger then 16, yet their societies seems to be doing fine and not having an aneurysm whenever the topic gets brought up.

This of course is to say nothing about how those same people who would scream from the rooftops and demand someone be tortured and murdered for touching someone under 18 even if they want it, are perfectly ok with sending 14 year olds or even younger to prison with adults where they will be raped and touched against their will.

CE's motto on the subject seems to be to young to consent but old enough to be raped.

Why is he currently not an active member if this post is still up?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

he said "children" is debatable definition

this thread reminds me of robin thicke's "blurred lines"

greyfox747 posted...

Especially when it comes from a user who keeps getting suspended for saying that theres nothing wrong with being attracted to 12 year olds

lol he keeps getting supsended for that

why does he think this place is where to talk about that?

AngelicRadiance posted...

Wtf is this topic?

It's an attempt to understand how people think.
Gamerguymass posted...

I think it's more a red flag or creepy that America is so obsessed with the number 18 that it's probably should be considered brainwashing at this point. As has already been brought up, the majority of states in America already have an aoc under 18. Not to mention just about every first world nation has it younger then 18 as well with many being even younger then 16, yet their societies seems to be doing fine and not having an aneurysm whenever the topic gets brought up.

This of course is to say nothing about how those same people who would scream from the rooftops and demand someone be tortured and murdered for touching someone under 18 even if they want it, are perfectly ok with sending 14 year olds or even younger to prison with adults where they will be raped and touched against their will.

CE's motto on the subject seems to be to young to consent but old enough to be raped.

this thread was about teenagers.

tbh and adult touching teenagers is sleazy at the least, anything younger is absolutely disgusting

heck, its debatable an adult and teenager is disgusting even if its consensual (i dont wanna split hairs though.)

Paragon21XX posted...

Only if he looks like the kind of person who has a nuanced opinion on age of consent laws.

And this would be what? Describe in a non vague way.

Umbreon posted...

No, I'd say it's pretty creepy to want to bang high schoolers as an adult. Even if it's legal(This excludes Romeo and Juliet scenarios).

Thats not what I was saying. I was responding specifically to those adult men who try and make arguments.

Most dudes would know "society thinks its creepy, better to keep it to myself".

I never said it wasn't "creepy".

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Anyone who tries to use laws which are fluid to justify certain behavior should be a red flag because they are sheep. Not because they are "child rapists".

If you're an adult who wants to bang high schoolers legally, and actually intend to, trying to speak out about it is a red flag in that you are a social idiot more than you are a creep.

WaterLink posted...

Remember how in one of the transformers movies they took time out of the movie to explain the romeo and juliet laws to justify their relationship lmao

Don't remember.

If anything society should look at itself and not be so perverted to think every couple is having sex.

TMOG posted...

I'd be asking this man why he wants to fuck 14 year olds so badly that he checked to see where it was legal

Ah, strawman. You're reaching here. You assume because someone is aware of laws they want to have sex with 14 year olds.

You're basically confirming the OP btw.

Is that a red flag?

And to continue, if it is a red flag, is that basically saying "It's better if someone is ignorant of actual laws and is brainwashed by social norms, instead of knowing the actual truth?

The off camera controversy most certainly wouldn't, even though its not illegal in most places.

mature is just desensitized

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/4/1/AAfKC7AAC7JN.jpg