| Board List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Senator John Cornyn, on Supreme Court precedent |
| Strand 06/25/22 7:10:25 PM #23 | Nerevar791 posted... I explicitly said his argument was a stupid one. Im not defending him lmao. Get a gripI'm not saying that you're defending Cornyn, but that your interpretation of his argument is flawed. The second part of your post doesn't address that flaw. --- "I am a man of somewhat retiring, and I might even say refined, tastes, and there is nothing more unaesthetic than a policeman." |
| Topic | Senator John Cornyn, on Supreme Court precedent |
| Strand 06/25/22 6:41:17 PM #20 | Nerevar791 posted... I see you conveniently ignored the second part of my postI don't see how the second part addresses my question --- "I am a man of somewhat retiring, and I might even say refined, tastes, and there is nothing more unaesthetic than a policeman." |
| Topic | Senator John Cornyn, on Supreme Court precedent |
| Strand 06/25/22 6:35:16 PM #17 | Nerevar791 posted... Theres another topic about this already. He was saying Roe, like Plessy (which Brown overruled) was bad precedent and that overturning precedent doesnt mean its a bad thing.How does overturning racial segregation relegate "the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologuesattacking the essential freedoms of millions of Americans"? --- "I am a man of somewhat retiring, and I might even say refined, tastes, and there is nothing more unaesthetic than a policeman." |
| Board List | Page List: 1 |