Lurker > Dingydang166

MrAndersonWb posted...

as this boards SMAL and catboy account destroyer, I feel there is a 60% chance he will at least get his post deleted within a 48 hour period

Yeah ok you are doing a bit. Damn. I was really hoping you were real.

Lmao did I really trigger your baby brain THIS much? What has made you this sensitive? Surely this is a bit.

Biofighter55 posted...

I uhhh how the fuck did you arrive at the conclusion that raping would solve that?

Well you would have to pull it out with your hands, which is still rape. And she is probably unconscious since ya know both her arms just got shattered and someome shoved a bomb up there so she can't really get consent.

So as you hear the bomb ticking inside her you realize every second that you stand there thinking is another second that thing is going to explode. So what do you do?

Just saying. Don't say a sentence like "no situation" and then get surprised when people try to come up with situations

FaultyCircuitry posted...

What the fuck made you think this was an acceptable thing to post?

He said "there is no situation". That's one. What that fuck else is the point of this topic? For everyone else to just write "hmmm yesss i concur?

What if a girl has a bomb in her vagina and her arms are broken?

cuttin_in_farm posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/0/0/AAZ897AADlz0.jpg

Dunno how accurate this is.

Microsoft going from the only space laser to the only gun is fucking hilarious

It scared me when the lightning took out the electricity, because that usually meant my memory card was going to be erased

Aressar posted...

Nobody actually likes this. The ones that claim they do just say that for show or ironically.

inb4 "lol" or "oh sweet summer child"

I know a girl who loves getting her feet licked, even just a foot massage gets her going. She told me about it before I even told her about my foot fetish.

spikethedevil posted...

Not a thing over here.

???

I've been to 17 pool parties in my life and every single one has ended with someone shittin the pool. I can't even imagine that not happening. How would you even know the party is over without someone shittin in the pool?

ToadallyAwesome posted...

This is a whole mood. Bro, like feet all you want but when your bringing losing penises into it thats just a weird fucking take. Like damn

Dang sorry I triggered that baby brain bro lemme hit you with the PG version so you mom can tuck you in cranky fuck

It is like looking at the other kid on the playground who has no pudding while holding your lunchbox KNOWING your mom packs you 2 puddings every single day. You just feel bad for the kid with no puddings for never knowing the joy of eating 2 puddings every single day.

GS4Life posted...

I played it off as best I could but alas I had no real witty comeback

But at the very least I don't think a dude who's in his 50s-60s is hooking up with a 21 yo girl

His dick prob still works and you better believe he still wants to use it.

I feel sorry for people without a foot fetish tbh. You are a missing out on a pleasure that cannot be replicated by anything else. It is like how you would feel about a dude who lost his penis when he was a kid. You pity him because he never got to know true pleasure. That is how I see all non-foot fetishists, poor souls who will never experience true pleasure.

"Let's get married"

viewmaster_pi posted...

regardless

*Irregardless

Well ya know today I learned Oliver and Co came out in the 80s. If you asked me 2 mins ago when this movie came out I would have said like fucking 1996 homie wheeeeew

If it weren't for "interests: God" and her being kinda ugly I would

...her?

Eh there are no mysteries with the penis. Everything it has to offer is just right on display.

Vaginas have a lot of darkness. Just too many places you can't see. Don't trust it. The fuck is it trying to hide?

Nah, no worse or better. Just a 0

Chris-chan probably will yeah. I don't know how but his tism shield has saved him again

Tsundere

I make the noise it makes when you shoot a wall in Megaman Legends with a pretty medium buster gun speed. It is like a beep but just a little more urgent.

DeadBankerDream posted...

I don't know what you want me to say. Claiming that the zoo staff shooting the gorilla is incorrect, not even that it was simply a bad decision, it was a mathematically wrong answer, because if they risked the kid's life there's a possibility that both could live IS delusional and based on ideological positions you hold rather than any aspect of reality we exist in.

It is delusional to believe that particular zoo staff with their combined IQ of 200 could do much better, agreed.

That was not the question though. That has never been the question. It was never the question in the topic title, nor was it the question of the post I made you replied to. I don't know how to make this concept any more clear to you.

And I really don't understand why you bring in some this "animal ideology" every single post? What word or sentence have I said to make you think this?

I just refuse to believe that the entire accumulation of all human knowledge equates to "blow gorilla's head off if he get kid" being the correct answer, and that there surely is a zoo out there that has a better answer than that.

pegusus123456 posted...

Dingydang's argument seems to be that they handled the situation incorrectly because the kid managed to get in there at all. I think it's just kind of silly to argue from that point because you've opened the scope so far.

That is not my argument at all. I mentioned the enclosure because the fact that it was shitty reflects upon how shitty the zoo is. Because of that, if I were to place this particular zoo on a tier list of "Zoos that are probably equipped to deal with a Harambe situation", I would place it low. Now I don't set forth that my tier list is objectively right, but I just don't think a place with a hole that kids can fall into that makes gorillas die is going to be very high

My argument is simply that if this happened at the Number 1 SSS Tier Zoo, Harambe would be alive.

DeadBankerDream posted...

Nope.

Pure delusion.

Look at you. Just throwing out buzzwords all day without explaining anything. It is like talking to a chatbot. Do you not have the ability to put your thoughts to keys? Do you have anything to offer other than these weird baseless ad hominem insults you sprinkle into every post? Is this all I am ever going to get out of you? I could scream at your brain for hours and I just would never hear anything else huh?

DeadBankerDream posted...

Whether or not Harambe is shot dead really depends on individual factors, doesn't it? Mainly the gorilla's behavior. Harambe didn't leave the child. Harambe died.

Simple as it should be.

Further you're being a big dummy. Of course that can be situations where Harambe is not killed and the kid survives. Point being, there's really no reason to take that chance other than you being a bad person who is willing to risk the life of a child based on some fucked up belief about the value of animals.

RIGHT, SO WE AGREE THEN. When posed with the question in the topic title, "Was the situation handled correct?", the answer, by your own words, in unarguably "No". If there is a situation where harambe and the kid ever get out alive, that would make that situation the "correct" one, and this the "incorrect" one. The correct one is where everyone lives, the incorrect one is the one where something dies. Simple. Moving on.

Perhaps if the original question posed was "Was the harambe situation handled correctly considering the limited knowledge, tools, and professionalism of the Zoo?", then the answer could be "Yes", since that would be giving those shitters the benefit of the doubt and not holding them to actual standards. but that wasn't the question,

So lets head on to my first goddamn post that sparked this:

"I mean I get the situation might be different, but SURELY "shoot gorilla in face" isn't the first plan we should be putting into action."

Nothing definite. I make no assumptions of the zoo keeping business. Just a a reasonable belief that in another zoo with better protocols that blowing the gorillas head off shouldn't be step one.

To which you replied with:

"Yes. Yes it f***ing is.

Holy s***.

Pure delusion by someone who bases his opinions on armchair ideology."

So are we both deluded then? I mean you agreed that there are situations where harambe lives? The very belief you called me delusional for? SO WHICH IS IT BRO ARE YOU WRONG OR ARE YOU WRONG?

DeadBankerDream posted...

I have said literally none of that.

Your belief is based on nothing onther the ideology of "derrrrp animals are goooood *snorts loudly*"

I'm sure the ideology has a more succinct name, but I'm using the more descriptive one.

I never said you said that, but you do believe that? I mean your stance is that you are 100% sure that this gorilla should be shot in this scenario isn't it? That would mean you believe everything I said. Otherwise, you are not 100% firm in this belief? In that case then shut the fuck up because you apparently don't believe this was handled correctly either.

So which is it bro? Do you agree with the belief that if this situation occured in every single zoo in the world, shooting Harambe dead is the only instance in every zoo that the kid lives? Or are you going to just shut the fuck up and just agree that you don't know shit? Or are you just going to use this brand new word you learned today "ideology" in another sentence that makes no goddamn sense?

DeadBankerDream posted...

A dangerous animal had a child in its hand. Immediate neutralization, not waiting for tranquilizers to take an effect, not risking angering the animal by "talking it down" should be plan A, plan B, plan C AND plan D.

So just want to make sure here. You believe that employees this shitty ass zoo that can't even manage to make an enclosure that doesn't suck ass utlitized perfect methods, tools, and planning during this incident? You believe that if this same exact scenario occured in every single zoo in the world, the only instances where the child survives are the ones where harambe is shot dead?

If yes, lemme see your zoo license bro, because there is no fucking way you or I would ever know that unless we happened to be real deep in the zoo keepin business during 2016. I sure as shit wasn't and I bet my dick you weren't either.

So yes, I believe if Harambe wasn't in some piece of shit zoo and had actual trained GOOD SOLID FUCKING professionals and not some bumfuck gator wrastlers then Harambe and the kid would both be alive.

DeadBankerDream posted...

Yes. Yes it fucking is.

Holy shit.

Pure delusion by someone who bases his opinions on armchair ideology.

Explain it then bro? Why was blowing a gorilla's brains out the only route humanity should possibly ever take in this scenario?

Naysaspace posted...

not every interaction is the same. also, shoot to kill, because you generally only have 1 shot.

Yeah, ok, sure. But from what I am reading refreshing myself on the situation, it just seems like Harambe grabbed the kid, ran around with him for 10 minutes while the zoo staff just chilled, and then they just shot him dead.

Maybe there is some other info out there but it seems like they didn't try a single other thing other than just sitting on their asses for 10 mins waiting for a dude with a rifle to walk on over to the gorilla exhibit

JUST SEEMS LIKE IDK BLOWING THE GORILLA'S BRAINS OUT SHOULD BE LIKE MAYBE PLAN D AND NOT PLAN A.

Didn't this same thing happen with like a tiger recently and both the tiger and kid came out alive? They couldn't just do that?

I mean I get the situation might be different, but SURELY "shoot gorilla in face" isn't the first plan we should be putting into action.

I am pretty sure Diablo Immortal, the most monetized game to ever exist, made a shit ton. So this isn't really that surprising. I doubt it will just stick to cosmetics.

Is there a youtube channel or anything where the fights go up? Even just the week 1 and 2 fights?

coolguyjimmy posted...

That's code for swinging, I believe.

IT MAKES SENSE but he really doesn't seem like that type of dude. He has a big group of guy friends he doesn't get to see that often due to work so I assumed she just meant he was crackin a cold one with the boys. But hell maybe I just don't know the party version of him either.

divot1338 posted...

Let me guess - married about six or seven years?

Yeah you nailed it, 6 years.

Allanon23 posted...

Is her husband going to be there?

Yes. All she said regarding this was "He goes off and does his own thing with his friends at parties."

We have been best friends for around 15 years, both in our late twenties. We had dated a bit in high school. She is married with kids now.

She invited me to a Halloween party she is throwing next month. I historically never go to any of her parties even though she always invites me, as I am just not a party sort of dude, big groups in general make me want to jump out a window and wake up in hell since waking up in a hospital means another goddamn group of people. So after I said no again this time, she starts talking into about how the kids will be gone that weekend so she is letting a few people stay the night, and she really wants me to come to the party and stay the night. She obviously knows about my introverted nature, so she then starts going into "And don't worry I will not leave your side for even a second. We can party for a bit and then just go back to T's room (her step-son, the room I would be staying in) and just chill together alone." She I say something alone the lines of like "Alright dude you talked me into it, having my own room to escape to is about the only way I could tolerate a party", and she kinda interrupted the end of me saying that sentence by saying "...and me joining you". Throughout the rest of our conversation she brought up her chilling together alone in her step-son's room like 3 more times. She added that fact that I better not be a bitch and not drink anything, that I haven't seen the "party side of her" yet, and that she "would tuck me in"

Now she was KINDA drunk during this, she wasn't slurring or anything but she was def a few glasses of wine in. She also kept making weird hand gestures whenever she talked about the room. She made the sideways peace sign with her tongue going through it the most. Like, is that not the "I eat pussy" sign? This confused the shit out of me. She stuck her tongue out a lot in general when doing any sort of hand motions. I am just going to chalk that one up to her bein a lil drunk I guess unless that sign means something I don't know. Or maybe she was just telling me she does in fact eat pussy idk.

If this were ANY other girl in the world i would just say "yeah I think she is trying to fuck me", but a married childhood friend? I dunno man. She in general is very motherly towards me, so I mean there is a reality out there where she really doesn't want to leave my side at all because she feels like I will get lonely or stressed or something, even though I told her just havin a room is fine.

The ONLY thing that has changed between us recently is I shaved my head for the first time recently after having long hair all my life, and she has been talking to me A LOT more since then. Like we NEVER facetimed before but now she is trying to facetime me every night to just talk about stuff. She has mentioned my shaved head many times, has called me handsome multiple times, and even said "I really just can't believe it, honestly you are like 1000x more handsome". But again that is also just like a mom line, so I just don't know. I also don't live in fucking Hey Arnold land where shaving your head all of a sudden makes you irresistible to women.

So what do you guys think is she trying to mom me or fuck me?

tldr; fuck u

Yeah Squall was a cool dude. All the h8ers are just people who never played the game and are jerkin off spooney or whatever that lil fuck's name was

Homelander probably. I mean hell you could go up to some camel jockey and they would say "Homelander" in perfect American

Mad-Dogg posted...

Zelos is my favorite symphonia character.

He (or kratos) was also my main controlled character when I played 4 player co-op with my brother, sister, and nephews. Its pretty fun acting as the main healer w/ healing wind n' stream and being able to fight on the Frontline at the same time. (With three or four of us playing raine was unneeded, so we ran zelos/kratos, lloyd, Regal, and presea or sheena).

You a better person than I was. I always gave my least favorite person in the group Raine.

It was Kratos when I was 12 and it still is. I just love the Magic Swordsman archetype, pretty sure he is what started it.

I did. She wore a long jean skirt thing that went down to her ankles every single day. That is all I remember about her.

There is a burger at mcds called deluxe quarter pounder or something. It is just a cheeseburger with lettuce, tomatos, and mayo. I cannot for the life of me get this burger without mayo. I originally was asking "replace the mayo with ketchup and mustard", but they fucked it every time so I just said "leave off mayo" and still no luck.

I have no joke ordered that burger 5 times and 5 times I got mayo. I just stopped ordering it. They fucked me into submission to never order it again, bravo mcdonalds, you win.

I love it but it's hard to recommend it to someone as an mmo. 80% of your time will just be spent soloing story for like the first 200 hours. The story is great though.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

You can provide a dictionary with these meanings, no?

Well any person with google could do it, no?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/literal

Definitions 3 and 4 fit my sentence just fine, no? Which in a way does imply that the "diamond" of that subject is metephorical, but it does still make that sentence correct, no?

If you would like to take the stance that you were simply pointing out that the diamond was a figurative one, rather than trying to correct me, then fine, I accept. That might be helpful to a person that believes I pulled a real diamond out of my computer screen, but that probably isn't a lot people, no?

EmbraceOfDeath posted...

That would be a figurative diamond, no?

You know there are other definitions of "literal" that maybe Rick and Morty didn't teach you, 2 of which could correctly be applied to my sentence, no?

Philip027 posted...

Okay. We'll just say ", don't you think?" instead, just for you.

Also worth pointing out that people will do this to you less if you're wrong less often.

This post so perfectly encapsulates a ",no?" person holy shit. Making this topic was worth it just to read this literal diamond.

Some examples would be like "I think X should go here, no?" or "It would be a lot better if X did this, no?". For awhile I didn't understand the point. It was just some dumb shit people tacked on to sentences. I even confronted some people about it, like just straight asked them why they put a fucking ",no?" at the end of their sentence, but they never had an answer. Not even these fucking clowns knew why.

But after looking at it and the examples of people using it, it is clear to me it is one of two things. One is just some halfassed pussy attempt for a person to let their opinion known without actually committing to it, so they put a ",no?" at the end to make it a question because they pussied out on making it a statement.

The second is just them being cocky assholes. It is when they THINK they know they are right, and are basically just using ",no?" as a taunt to goad the other party into replying with "No", so that they can now use that as tinder to spark an argument using that "No" you just mindlessly autopilot replied with as the foundation for their argument for now until the end of time.

Either reason is stupid so fucking stop

inb4 post that says ",no?" at the end

Def not the same but it's a decent option for diet fkers