Lurker > VaniIIa Coke

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/17/17 1:08:27 AM
#401
Can someone explain how circular logic is flawed logically untill it manifests as the burden of proof?
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/14/17 10:56:07 AM
#387
Dash_Harber posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
LordZangetsu_LZ posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Great explaination lmao. Magic rocks, this is laughably stupid.


As opposed to magic Man.

Although the question is why do think there's a cause?


Lmao magic man?

God is not man. God is God.

Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?

God is God. Wow. That explains it.


God is something besides God, pshh that's a lie. Have some common sense you dolt.


Your argument is actually logically unsound. Your argument is literally circular reasoning and by using your premise as your argument you are actually invalidating your own argument.


Projecting lmao. this is litterally how athiests percieve others logic because of what they themselves do.

The burden of proof is the example. Which is not a part of logic or reasoning or even philosophy. It's part of the legal system. Like how braindead do you need to be to function like this?
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/12/17 2:57:55 PM
#373
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
So energy cannot be created or destroyed, and this parallels the intrinsic nature of God.


Things that don't exist don't have a nature, intrinsic or otherwise.

But wait, do you believe matter and energy can be destroyed and created?


Why are you talking about nothing? Not really sure what you're getting at.

Beliefs are like opinions, and opinions are like butts. Everyone's got one, and nobody wants to hear yours.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/11/17 10:46:55 PM
#371
hockeybub89 posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?


I don't assume cause for things that don't exist.

Why do you assume cause for matter and energy? We already know matter and energy can't be created nor destroyed...


So you treat energy like God? This is why I have absolutely no respect for atheists. They complain about shit, and then do the same shit with a different label. Difference being I'm not complaining about what I'm doing.

Athiests bitch about what I do then utilize the same logic while cherry picking subtraction of God. In an infinite universe, I keep open all possibilities that the ambiguity of God holds true and honest to.

If you're open to all possibilities, why stop at the Christian God? Why not believe in everything since everything is possibly true? Your head might explode from so many beliefs. Why is he the one thing you can accept without evidence?


There is one God, cultures paint him differently. Religions too. Many people find him through religion, many don't.

So I do not stop at the "christian" God. And my head is just fine.

Also I have evidence for God. You don't.

Not my problem.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/11/17 9:48:09 PM
#369
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
So you treat energy like God?


No.

Try again.



Lmao..

So energy cannot be created or destroyed, and this parallels the intrinsic nature of God.

I'm actually not asking if you treat energy like God, I'm telling you.

Furthermore, scientists have no idea what the fuck energy actually is.

http://www.ftexploring.com/energy/definition.html

Yet it's the foundation of science.

I say, energy, is the energy of God. And you have no way to prove otherwise. You may claim I have no proof it is, but proof is not my necessity, it's yours because you need what you have not. So, by your own rules, fuck off.

I don't need proof, because I have it. God is proof.

able to withstand something damaging; resistant.
"the marine battle armor was proof against most weapons"
synonyms:resistant to, immune from, unaffected by, invulnerable to, impenetrable by, impervious to, repellent to

---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/10/17 8:06:19 PM
#354
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?


I don't assume cause for things that don't exist.

Why do you assume cause for matter and energy? We already know matter and energy can't be created nor destroyed...


So you treat energy like God? This is why I have absolutely no respect for atheists. They complain about shit, and then do the same shit with a different label. Difference being I'm not complaining about what I'm doing.

Athiests bitch about what I do then utilize the same logic while cherry picking subtraction of God. In an infinite universe, I keep open all possibilities that the ambiguity of God holds true and honest to.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/10/17 7:50:32 PM
#353
Twin3Turbo posted...
LordZangetsu_LZ posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Great explaination lmao. Magic rocks, this is laughably stupid.


As opposed to magic Man.

Although the question is why do think there's a cause?


Lmao magic man?

God is not man. God is God.

Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?

God is God. Wow. That explains it.

Man he cleared that age old question up just like that!


You are a genius too.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/10/17 7:49:23 PM
#352
LordZangetsu_LZ posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Great explaination lmao. Magic rocks, this is laughably stupid.


As opposed to magic Man.

Although the question is why do think there's a cause?


Lmao magic man?

God is not man. God is God.

Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?

God is God. Wow. That explains it.


God is something besides God, pshh that's a lie. Have some common sense you dolt.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/10/17 8:15:37 AM
#348
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Great explaination lmao. Magic rocks, this is laughably stupid.


As opposed to magic Man.

Although the question is why do think there's a cause?


Lmao magic man?

God is not man. God is God.

Why do you no cause for an explosion, but assume cause for God?
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/09/17 10:25:47 PM
#341
GameofWheels posted...
According to the theories of physics, if we were to look at the Universe one second after the Big Bang, what we would see is a 10-billion degree sea of neutrons, protons, electrons, anti-electrons (positrons), photons, and neutrinos. Then, as time went on, we would see the Universe cool, the neutrons either decaying into protons and electrons or combining with protons to make deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen). As it continued to cool, it would eventually reach the temperature where electrons combined with nuclei to form neutral atoms. Before this "recombination" occurred, the Universe would have been opaque because the free electrons would have caused light (photons) to scatter the way sunlight scatters from the water droplets in clouds. But when the free electrons were absorbed to form neutral atoms, the Universe suddenly became transparent. Those same photons - the afterglow of the Big Bang known as cosmic background radiation - can be observed today.

https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-powered-the-big-bang
Astronomers think that the Universe started with the Big Bang. As with all science, this is based on evidence; so what is the evidence for the Big Bang theory? Very early in its history, the whole Universe was very hot. As it expanded, this heat left behind a "glow" that fills the entire Universe. The Big Bang theory not only predicts that this glow should exist, but that it should be visible as microwaves - part of the Electromagnetic Spectrum.

This is the Cosmic Microwave Background which has been accurately measured by orbiting detectors, and is very good evidence that the Big Bang theory is correct.

http://www.schoolsobservatory.org.uk/learn/astro/cosmos/bigbang/bb_evid

And here's a video from PBS
https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/ess05.sci.ess.eiu.microwave/evidence-for-the-big-bang-theory/

Since no one else is explaining anything


What's the cause tho? Everyone agrees with the initial event of creation. The cause is what came before.

Your answer in willful ignorance: Nothing.

Great explaination lmao. Magic rocks, this is laughably stupid.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/09/17 9:39:48 PM
#340
Hexagon posted...
@kewldude475

so atheism is totally out of the question for me lol. I'll believe in a god long before ever believing explosions can create matter and life out of literally nothing


Matter coming from nothing seems just as magical as a diety existing, to me. There's at least equal chance of a god existing to me


You just contradicted yourself pretty quickly. I honestly expected more game from you.


atheism or game. pick one.

xD
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/07/17 8:00:17 PM
#262
Dragonblade01 posted...
However you choose to define god:

Why should we believe that god exists?

And why should we use that definition?


If you think the value of God is irrelevant, I want to know what the hell you are actually trying to understand.

On that note, how are you asking an honest question while using a variable. Variables are liable to change.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/07/17 11:24:51 AM
#260
Dragonblade01 posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
God is secular.

Religion is not the basis of God, God is the basis of religion.

I do believe Jesus adhered to the true God of all creation from his position I see through his words.

I want to make a distinction between God and religion tho.

God=/=Religion

lol, a lot of people here needed that.

That's fine. But religion or not, what reason do you have to believe that such a thing exists? And if such a thing exists, why should it be given a label with such baggage as "god."


What thing?

I thought we were talking about God, if not religion.

A thing is an inanimate material object as distinct from a living sentient being.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/06/17 10:56:25 PM
#257
LordZangetsu_LZ posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
How are you going to claim to understand peoples beliefs to detail they believe lies..


Communication.

Do you believe Zeus throws lightning bolts?


Why do you think he throws footballs or small dogs or glitter? Like wtf, you are talking about fucking Zues.

Don't ask me any more stupid questions.

Here's to honest communication.

When you ask an honest question, you will appreciate my honest answers.

do you believe in the christian God?


God is secular.

Religion is not the basis of God, God is the basis of religion.

I do believe Jesus adhered to the true God of all creation from his position I see through his words.

I want to make a distinction between God and religion tho.

God=/=Religion

lol, a lot of people here needed that.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/06/17 5:55:15 PM
#255
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
How are you going to claim to understand peoples beliefs to detail they believe lies..


Communication.

Do you believe Zeus throws lightning bolts?


Why do you think he throws footballs or small dogs or glitter? Like wtf, you are talking about fucking Zues.

Don't ask me any more stupid questions.

Here's to honest communication.

When you ask an honest question, you will appreciate my honest answers.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicWhy is that when a guy hits a girl first, he is demonized way more...
VaniIIa Coke
08/06/17 12:44:42 PM
#14
Vegy posted...
Slayerblade11 posted...
Guys are stronger than girls

so sexism den


Do you even lift?

Testosterone and male attributes are real.

Girls aren't offended by male attributes. It turns them on. Idk if you've had a girl friend before, but prejudice is forming an opinion without reason or experience. For example, crying sexism over attributes of male or female differences without being able to understand their presence in the real world.

Another example:
If you ever go to the gym in your lifetime you'll notice it isn't an avg of 50% woman and 50% men lifting in the weight room.

It's predominately a male activity in the average community.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicWhy is that when a guy hits a girl first, he is demonized way more...
VaniIIa Coke
08/06/17 12:08:00 PM
#11
SSJ2Gogeto posted...
. True equality is when both sides are treated equally shitty.


Right, but male and females aren't equal.

That's why in sports we have divisions.

Why men don't get pregnant.

We are different. Not equal. We should be treated in respect to our differences.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
Topichow to do a Raging Demon irl?
VaniIIa Coke
08/04/17 6:11:09 PM
#4
I've done it, but I don't condone it, so I'm not telling you.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/04/17 2:01:21 PM
#245
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
I don't demand absolute 100% proof (as if such a thing actually exists).

I simply will not accept a claim on insufficient evidence and poor reasoning. No amount of empty sophistry can change that. This isn't just for gods, btw. I will not accept any claims on those grounds; and if I discover that I do believe something on those grounds, I correct my thinking.


God is the very proof atheists seek. So seek the truth above all else, fixate on the truth, and there you will find God.


No. This is just describing the psychosomatic effect.



I don't give a fuck what your terms of disagreement are.


No, you're thinking about it wrong. If search for "god" expecting to find "god," I will end up attributing something to "god" out of anticipation of it. It's like when someone anticipates getting sick and assumes it will happen and then they end up making themselves sick. It's like a self-fulfilling prophecy only in actual legit psychological form. It's not my term and it is something that psychologically occurs in people, so you giving a fuck or not giving a fuck doesn't change the fact that the phenomenon is a real thing that happens.


nope lol

according to the psychosomatic effect, me not giving a fuck does actually change the fact. xD

It literally means you can't even prove it exists, because of course I'll be rejecting anyones supporting claims.

That's how this works, right?

The Deadpool posted...
The weird shit about religious people to me is that they know people believe in lies. They know religions are just lies people are mostly indoctrinated into as a child.

That lack of self awareness is amazing...


Agreed, about both of you.

How are you going to claim to understand peoples beliefs to detail they believe lies.. That's knowing decieving yourself. While the curtail of atheism is to not just omit but reject these same peoples values, beliefs, claims and understanding.

If you don't share in their understanding, how the fuck are you going to claim you know what and how they believe?

You must be claiming to be psychic, or more likely just revealing how your religious attempts failed.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/02/17 11:36:09 PM
#240
Step up, atheist.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/02/17 11:33:34 PM
#239
The Deadpool posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
This doesn't require religion. At all


And yet, one generally follows.

You can replace religion with "belief in supernatural" if it makes you feel better. It doesn't change the fact that everyone knows that everyone else is believing in bullshit. The atheist just takes it one step further.

VaniIIa Coke posted...
It for the strangest reason makes atheists arguments cave in on their own logic.


Does it? Funny. I find that my atheism makes panentheist look exactly as silly as every other theist...


Siller observer, things aren't always as they seem. What makes you so trustworthy?

Replacing religion with belief.

No tricks here? Listen up chump.

Words have meaning, that's the truth. Stop lying to yourself. You may situationally replace x with y, but you're only fooling yourself. Your hypotheticals switches are what's bullshit. They don't demonstrate logic, reason, nor sentience. It's just stupidity.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/02/17 8:00:01 PM
#236
The Deadpool posted...
The difference between the theist and the atheist is just one religion...


Definition of theism. : belief in the existence of a god

This doesn't require religion. At all.

Personally, I'm a panentheist. It for the strangest reason makes atheists arguments cave in on their own logic. Most atheists are biased, uneducated, and seem to repeat key points that haven't been mentally thought through to support their position.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
08/02/17 6:50:55 PM
#235
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
I don't demand absolute 100% proof (as if such a thing actually exists).

I simply will not accept a claim on insufficient evidence and poor reasoning. No amount of empty sophistry can change that. This isn't just for gods, btw. I will not accept any claims on those grounds; and if I discover that I do believe something on those grounds, I correct my thinking.


God is the very proof atheists seek. So seek the truth above all else, fixate on the truth, and there you will find God.


No. This is just describing the psychosomatic effect.



I don't give a fuck what your terms of disagreement are.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:52:43 PM
#219
SuperBaller posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
No, how about we talk about this "evidence" that god exists first, and where it can be seen. Nobody has presented this evidence, and i can tell you now you never will and will instead keep dodging.


The Bible LOL
Checkmate xD


I like how the bible is a collection of books, yet people dismiss it as one.

To be truely scientific you'd have to debunk each book individually rather than dismiss the collection based on one passage of one book. And then still, you have the whole interpretation debate.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:43:34 PM
#218
Medussa posted...
do you have anything to contribute that isn't batshit? you've kinda gone off the deep end here.


can you try to say something, preferably intelligent rather than question everything like a non cognitively functioning person that can't hold himself together when ideas become bigger.. and better.

Maybe you should contribute.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:37:28 PM
#217
Medussa posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Let's talk about how the accepted scientific theories are established by a popularity vote tho.

Logic and reason at its finest. Because the truth and facts are established by a democracy.


what the actual fuck are you talking about?


How does the scientific community agree on accepted theories then? Is it not by popular agreement?
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:25:29 PM
#213
Dragonblade01 posted...
I don't demand absolute 100% proof (as if such a thing actually exists).

I simply will not accept a claim on insufficient evidence and poor reasoning. No amount of empty sophistry can change that. This isn't just for gods, btw. I will not accept any claims on those grounds; and if I discover that I do believe something on those grounds, I correct my thinking.


God is the very proof atheists seek. So seek the truth above all else, fixate on the truth, and there you will find God.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:24:48 PM
#212
OpheliaAdenade posted...
With proof there can be no faith, lucky for God...


Proof exists in the field of mathematics.

One cannot solve for God, because God is not a problem. Much less a variable. God and the truth are one. This pattern is fixed, while variables don't have fixed pattern.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:08:33 PM
#206
Let's talk about how the accepted scientific theories are established by a popularity vote tho.

Logic and reason at its finest. Because the truth and facts are established by a democracy.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:04:39 PM
#203
Rika_Furude posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
SSJ-Spiderman posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
There is no evidence of god

Not true.

Show me undisputable evidence of gods existence


All evidence is disputable.

Hence scientific theory.

Science has never nor will ever prove anything. So why do atheist who f***ing love science, demand this proof?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/common-misconceptions-about-science-i-scientific-proof

Fine, show me evidence that proves gods existence beyind reasonable doubt


Beyond doubt? Faith.

lol
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:02:09 PM
#201
because they are illogical, and wrong

xD
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 11:01:33 PM
#199
Rika_Furude posted...
SSJ-Spiderman posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
There is no evidence of god

Not true.

Show me undisputable evidence of gods existence


All evidence is disputable.

Hence scientific theory.

Science has never nor will ever prove anything. So why do atheist who f***ing love science, demand this proof?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/common-misconceptions-about-science-i-scientific-proof
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicConsciousness is weird when you think about it.
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 10:47:11 PM
#45
If you continue resorting to probability, it becomes apparent you don't know.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicConsciousness is weird when you think about it.
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 10:46:09 PM
#44
COVxy posted...
Consciousness is a bunk construct, only used to reinforce metaphysical interpretations of the mind, to elevate subjective experience to a supernatural realm. Probably due to a weird combination of narcicism and nonreligious spirituality that seems endemic amongst those who discuss it.


lmao, nice joke post COVxy
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 9:40:48 PM
#193
Hexagon posted...
SSJ-RingoStarr posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Dash_Harber posted...
Volkswagen_Bros posted...
Now saying "There isn't sufficient proof of God's existence" makes more sense because the Universe, as massive and expanding as it is, isn't and probably might never be 100% explored.


That's not really fair, though. All claims that exist without any evidence are not, "lacking sufficient evidence". If I claim something insane, like that the ancient pyramids were built by time traveling New Yorker's who had been enslaved by inter-dimensional lizard people, you would say "there is no evidence of that" because the claim lacks evidence.

As for Christianity, it inherently can't have any proof. The concepts of faith and proof are mutually exclusive. You can either have one or the other. Faith, by definition, means believing in something without faith. So there actually is 'no evidence of God'.

That being said, I agree that calling a god, "a magic sky man" is asinine and hurts his cause more than it helps it.


Evidence, can be footprints, while in Gods case it would be the universe itself. Or experience itself. Talking about our experience doesn't mention anything about the experience we have. In my experience though, there's intuitive feelings brought about by experiencing experience and that essence itself scales meaning when adjusting the scope of all things.

It goes without saying common sense is not common. God can be sensed, and senses can be lost. But without a sense of doubt the multititude of God has presented presence in my senses enough times to know better than those who are senseless, or out of touch with God.

Relationships define our existence, and the quality of all our relationships determine the presentation of our presence and set the limits of our senses. When something has not been used for so long, it is forgotten. When one has not, nor proof beyond recollection. It cannot be reconciled without the condusive presence from the seeker of the lost senses, nor proven beyond the senses.

If you do write proof of God, and remove freewill from another by writing determination of the absolute truth, watch as it dissolves before it is shared. Such proof would destroy itself seemlessly in logical accord to our physical science, to restore freewill. The laws of nature are the laws of God.

When CE gets real.

Great post.


How fascinating. I thought it was a senseless mash of incoherent ramblings. But to each their own I suppose.


Point in case.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 9:16:01 PM
#187
Hexagon posted...
Each persons experience is different, why would heaven the same?


Yet we live on the same Earth. What a total non-argument.


My point.

Dragonblade01 posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
So each person's heaven is different? If I tell someone about my heaven, and they think my heaven is better than their heaven, does my heaven become their heaven? If someone, for whatever reason, thinks hell seems like a great place to be, does hell become their heaven?


Each persons experience is different, why would heaven the same?

And no desire or the sense of greener grass, or the feeling of lacking is not a substitute for contentment. If heaven is perfect no one will come up with anything better. Heaven is not a possession either. People don't have a heaven.

If someone welcomes hell by going against the God of All Creation in their whole existence, they will change their mind about its quality after torment, loss of control, demonic presence, screams of demonic spirits, and disaster wreaking havoc on their daily life, goals and relationships.

Either Earth is a place with objective qualities experienced by an individual, or it's entirely the subjective experience of the individual. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 8:45:18 PM
#184
Dragonblade01 posted...
So each person's heaven is different? If I tell someone about my heaven, and they think my heaven is better than their heaven, does my heaven become their heaven? If someone, for whatever reason, thinks hell seems like a great place to be, does hell become their heaven?


Each persons experience is different, why would heaven the same?

And no desire or the sense of greener grass, or the feeling of lacking is not a substitute for contentment. If heaven is perfect no one will come up with anything better. Heaven is not a possession either. People don't have a heaven.

If someone welcomes hell by going against the God of All Creation in their whole existence, they will change their mind about its quality after torment, loss of control, demonic presence, screams of demonic spirits, and disaster wreaking havoc on their daily life, goals and relationships.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 8:03:46 PM
#183
Dash_Harber posted...
Volkswagen_Bros posted...
Now saying "There isn't sufficient proof of God's existence" makes more sense because the Universe, as massive and expanding as it is, isn't and probably might never be 100% explored.


That's not really fair, though. All claims that exist without any evidence are not, "lacking sufficient evidence". If I claim something insane, like that the ancient pyramids were built by time traveling New Yorker's who had been enslaved by inter-dimensional lizard people, you would say "there is no evidence of that" because the claim lacks evidence.

As for Christianity, it inherently can't have any proof. The concepts of faith and proof are mutually exclusive. You can either have one or the other. Faith, by definition, means believing in something without faith. So there actually is 'no evidence of God'.

That being said, I agree that calling a god, "a magic sky man" is asinine and hurts his cause more than it helps it.


Evidence, can be footprints, while in Gods case it would be the universe itself. Or experience itself. Talking about our experience doesn't mention anything about the experience we have. In my experience though, there's intuitive feelings brought about by experiencing experience and that essence itself scales meaning when adjusting the scope of all things.

It goes without saying common sense is not common. God can be sensed, and senses can be lost. But without a sense of doubt the multititude of God has presented presence in my senses enough times to know better than those who are senseless, or out of touch with God.

Relationships define our existence, and the quality of all our relationships determine the presentation of our presence and set the limits of our senses. When something has not been used for so long, it is forgotten. When one has not, nor proof beyond recollection. It cannot be reconciled without the condusive presence from the seeker of the lost senses, nor proven beyond the senses.

If you do write proof of God, and remove freewill from another by writing determination of the absolute truth, watch as it dissolves before it is shared. Such proof would destroy itself seemlessly in logical accord to our physical science, to restore freewill. The laws of nature are the laws of God.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/31/17 3:10:26 PM
#161
Funkdamental posted...
People still unironically make topics like this?


salty
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/29/17 5:59:10 PM
#123
TrevorBlack79 posted...
Volkswagen_Bros posted...
Saying "There isn't evidence of God's existence" isn't a valid argument.


Yes it is. Existence claims need to be supported with evidence, otherwise they can be summarily dismissed.


Except in reality, where existence is infinite and that needs no proof. The universe is infinite, and we don't see more because it's that f***ing big.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/29/17 5:54:15 PM
#121
Veggeta X posted...
Oh I apologize for not properly using the English language to convey what I literally and technically mean. "The fuck?" is something of a slang for "I do not understand what you are saying".


I'm not responsible for what you understand.

Keep on truckin'
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/29/17 5:23:53 PM
#119
Veggeta X posted...
VaniIIa Coke posted...
Veggeta X posted...
Militant Atheists are just as bad as crazy religious God believing people.


Sure, but worse for the bejiggidy.. blame you for what I'm doing, thing.

The fuck?


Do you have a question? Because that's why people use question marks.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/29/17 5:08:12 PM
#117
Veggeta X posted...
Militant Atheists are just as bad as crazy religious God believing people.


Sure, but worse for the bejigidy.. blame you for what I'm doing, thing.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/29/17 4:28:19 PM
#113
Volkswagen_Bros posted...


Now saying "There is sufficient proof of God's existence" makes more sense because the Universe, as massive and expanding as it is, probably might never be 100% explored


fixed
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/26/17 1:24:59 PM
#6
thanks --kresnik-- posted...
That's a good username, TC.


truth bombs
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/26/17 1:10:16 PM
#3
KiwiTerraRizing posted...
The truth doesn't need to be advocated, it's still the truth.


The truth doesn't need.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicDoes anyone still unironically advocate atheism?
VaniIIa Coke
07/26/17 1:04:08 PM
#1
That trend was worse than fidget spinners.
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicRemember Obama?
VaniIIa Coke
07/18/17 4:26:18 PM
#1
neither do I.

bia felicia administration
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicI just got back from Russia. Holy. Crap.
VaniIIa Coke
07/18/17 4:23:12 PM
#37
Feline_Heart posted...
Nice try, Vladmir


Checkmate, atheists
---
~Reward your curiosity~
TopicSo Nasa.gov says the earth is round, but round isn't a shape
VaniIIa Coke
07/18/17 7:20:00 AM
#6
ikr, that globe earth in all the classrooms tho
---
~Reward your curiosity~
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3