Lurker > King Rial

Chad-Henne posted...

She looks like she's one of the character drawings from FF6

L

Hicks233 posted...

All the better for reaching the juiciest leaves at the top of the tree.

O

Axiom posted...

TFW you discover Jennifer Lawrence is a rokurokubi

L
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Milkman5 posted...

CableZL posted...

She has really good high speed internet.

what does that even mean

High Speed Internet aka DSL aka Dick Sucking Lips.


Dyinglegacy posted...

Not sure what that's suppose to be.

Gooby, pls.
---

Yeah... I'm into that.

I wish the face wasn't carved up like that, but BY GOSH GOLLY DARN she thicka that a snicka.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

DragonPick posted...

Vyrulisse posted...

He was our guiding light, our dark star.

More of a moon, really

---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

A legend held dearly by the royal family.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Aide: Mr. President, North Korea is set to attack any minute.

President Hill: Bwaaahhhh!!!
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Of course. Where you think they get it from?
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

:D
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

If you're REALLY really desperate, I'm available.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Ratatouille
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

....N-.....n-no....
---

http://i.imgur.com/wvWeREx.gifv

TheSextMachine posted...

Is that Chris Parnell?

Yeah.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Certainly can be.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

I need to get very rich...
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

I hope you don't mind me laughing a bit at that sequence of events.

It just reminded me of last night, how I somehow lost a card in between ordering food and the guy coming to the door. So he's standing there waiting for me for like 10 minutes while I frantically try to trace my steps. He's like "Don't worry about it, just sign" but I'm trying to find that fricken card!

It turned out it was under the menu I used to order... >____>
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

This is from Sammy directly? Not a cool way to treat customers returning after the Note 7 problems.

@Nikra

I know how much you cared about Cable's Note 7.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

I just don't feel it's worth the price. Still, cool phone. If I had it like that, I'd probably buy it.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

@Renault
---

"I keep a picture of my butthole in my wallet." - fire810

Sami1000 posted...

Because people who buys expensive phones can afford to buy them.

I personally would buy a phone with good everything, especially good audio through headphone jack, and without any camera. The camera is probably the most expensive part in the phone and ramps the price up considerably, yet its the one thing i could care less in phones. I hate it that i'm paying for something i know i won't ever even use. I paid 400€ for my samsung S6, without camera it could had been like 320€ or less.

Nah. The camera is like the third or fourth most expensive part, usually, depending on the size of the flash nand. The screen is the most expensive, usually. Or the processor/chipset.

And the majority seem to care about pictures a lot. I can't imagine a niche product like that selling well enough to justify the cost to build it.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

How do you do the things you do?
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

@QassTank
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

They want to.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Dorothy... v___v
---

Saxton you've never done anything good in your life. - Bad News Barrett

Actually, I am.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Number One topic?
---

http://i.imgur.com/pGp8tIS.gif

<_________<
---

Things will be different.

Maybe avoid rape and slaves for your topics, vegy?
---

I use Google... A lot... >____>

Frosted_Midna posted...

"Go paperless, don't stress girl..."

Now I got that shit stuck in my head! UGH!
---

Yeah... I'm into that.

Just "Rial", please...
---

"I keep a picture of my butthole in my wallet." - fire810

I find the box to be an awful character. He's a jerk, and not in a funny way, either.
---

I use Bing... For Rewards... >____>

ChromaticAngel posted...

Ok so according to you, if someone is wrong, they are just not allowed to post a correction. Got it.

No. This was advice specifically for you as I've never seen you do it. You need jump to no other conclusion than "can I admit I was wrong and leave it at that."

And again, if you don't want to do it, you just don't. Simple as that.
---

Just Rial.

ReggieBush09 posted...

life is unfair

You're not the boss of me now!
You're not the boss of me now!
---

I use Bing... For Rewards... >____>

ChromaticAngel posted...

You literally did do it in post #26

Go back and read it yourself. I can't edit your own post.

You mean the post that said that one day you should try admitting wrong without anything added? Because that is acknowledging that you admitted you were wrong, but mentioning that you only do so with qualifiers. Which, as I have repeatedly said, is moving past what happened today and into how you respond in other situations.

And for the record, when I mentioned editing I meant it like the statement you just quoted while editing out the end of the sentence. A partial quote like that is dishonest.
---

"Of course not, Dee. Think of the smell. You havent thought of the smell, you b*****!"

Chris Chan


---

Your butt is so devastated it has warped itself in over your face and you have become your own butt - P01ntyDmonspank to yem69420

---

I use Bing... For Rewards... >____>

DrizztLink posted...

The lot of you look foolish.

Literally all of you.

Even people not in the discussion at all. It's really just me and ChromaticAngel.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

ChromaticAngel posted...

Empirically wrong. First of all, you can't tell the difference between advised and revised as you've made that mistake multiple times. Secondly, the revised statement is empirically true.

I know the difference, but I did indeed use the wrong word. More than once. It's something I hate to do. I hate typos. I feel like a numb when I make them. Especially when being technical with someone else.Thanks for pointing it out.

No nothing needs clarification because you don't want a discussion, you just want to be belligerent on the internet.

But I do want a discussio, and I'm not being belligerent, nor do I want to be, I'm asking for what needs clarifying because I genuinely would like to know. Like when I screwed up and you pointed it out. I am genuinely glad you did because I hate screwing up like that.

The discussion is regarding a fight between a human and a black bear. You are the one that derailed the topic by nitpicking mathematical mass differences totaling less than 2 kilograms which doesn't impact my statements outside of a hyper literal interpretation.

I didn't derail the topic with your wrong statement. Correcting your statement and asking you were you got your info from shouldn't be a derailment, either.

This is bullshit.

see:
Me: 1+1=3
You: Actually, 1+1=2
Me: Whoops, I said something wrong, however, 1+2=3
You: WHY WON'T YOU ADMIT THAT YOU ARE WRONG!??!!?

But I literally didn't do this, and you are literally being dishonest, because you cannot quote me making that statement, unless you edit a sentence. I've already stipulated to you admitting you were initially wrong. I have said time and time again that I'm not talking about this conversation anymore but about the future. "No" is the response to that, and that's okay. Like I said, you don't have to take my advice.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Us Ants....
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Leight_Weight posted...

Who's winning?

There is no "winning" or "losing" here. This isn't even about the topic anymore.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

clearaflagrantj posted...

Jesus she could beat a kitten to death with these fun bags

Why? Poor kitten... :(
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

N-no.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

ChromaticAngel posted...

Literally all of this is bullshit.

Factual. Your statement was wrong. Your advised statement was still incorrect. Only by changing it to the point that it makes your original claim useless did it become correct. Still a pointless thing to point out. Don't forget that you doubled down before being shown the facts.

That's my fault for trying to clarify misunderstandings I thought you had when you're actually here to be belligerent and dishonest.

But there was nothing to clarify. What did you think needed clarifying?

Admission + Revision is still Admission.

And admission plus "but if we change the discussion then I'm right" is intellectual dishonesty and irrelevant to the discussion at hand, though.

Fucking get over yourself.

If we truly had the capacity to get over ourselves, you wouldn't get into weekly arguments on CE were you are often wrong. And then through mental gymnastics try to create a scenario in which you are right, but completely misses the original point in doing so.


If it seems to you like I'm being belligerent then I apologize. But I haven't been dishonest, whereas your revision is dishonesty. If you want to point out what I did that you feel was dishonest and why you feel it is dishonest, I'm all ears.

I'm just being factual. It's an annoying thing I do, and I have to work on it. I guess that's why I like that episode of Futurama so much. "You are technically correct. The best kind of correct!" I notice you do this in many debates when people point out you're wrong and I just thought, maybe it hasn't been pointed out to you, and it is something you can work on.

You obviously don't have to take my advice. But have you ever examined why you're this way?
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

ChromaticAngel posted...

the numbers are regional, in some regions it is less than 60kg, and even if you want to be pedantic about "61.88" kg, it's still well under the maximum range for sun bears in which my revised statement is still correct. you're the one who says the data is not there when it clearly is there and you linked it. That's just a straight up lie.

This is literally the "qualifier" revisionist shit I'm talking about.

You are dishonest, and I didn't lie. I was precise in what my complaint was with your statement. Your original statement was wrong. Your advised statement didn't pertain to the conversation, but you said it anyway because you can't stand just being wrong, even though you often are on CE.

And do you see how many times you have to change your statement for it to be true? And do you see how it is STILL irrelevant to the conversation?


ChromaticAngel posted...

I already said "I was fundamentally wrong" and I revised my wrong statement to an empyrically correct one "the average adult female black bear is smaller than some Sun bears" which remains correct even if we factor outlier regional averages.

What the fuck are you even arguing about? the specific choice of words, or 1.9 kilograms of bear or what?

My argument was that one day(that's in the future, not something that has already passed), try admitting you are wrong without the "ifs, ands, or buts". One day. Not in this conversation because you've already done the "but" thing, and it can't be undone. But in the future try just admitting and not revising.

That's it.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

ChromaticAngel posted...

It's literally right there on the wiki page you posted.

Again, add those numbers up. They equal more than 60kg. 61.88kg to be precise. Your "less than 60kg" is not represented in the data. And still has no real point in the conversation.

ChromaticAngel posted...

I don't know what else you want me to say.

The qualifier is all of this other stuff you're still posting about. It's too late for you to admit you were wrong without any qualifiers on on this subject. You've already tainted it with your "well if you look at it this particular way that is dishonest then I actually am right" crap. That's literally not just admitting you were wrong without trying to come up with a justification for why you feel you weren't really wrong. On day just try it. "Oh, I was mistaken." With nothing else to it. No "ifs, ands or buts", as they say.
---

I need something more...

Her sister Hennessy Carolina is better looking, in my opinion.

If I could have the both of them together? WOOOOOOO!

</dead>
---

I need something more...

ChromaticAngel posted...

My conclusion "adult female black bears are smaller than some Sun Bears" is represented in the data.

"They are the smallest" is a fundamentally wrong statement, but you can still get an adult female black bear that is smaller than a sun bear.

That means practically nothing in this case(apples to oranges), but I'm talking about you claiming the average female black bear weighs less than 60kg. Where are you getting this from? The data I'm looking at doesn't say this. The average is over 60kg.

The fact that one could possibly find a female black bear that is smaller than a sun bear doesn't mean that black bears are smaller on average. The biggest sun bear is still smaller than the biggest black bear. The smallest black bear is still bigger than the smallest sun bear. The average black bear is still bigger than the average sun bear. Doing the math from the data listed in the sources, it seems that only the biggest sun bear is smaller than the average black bear. I'm not sure what calculations you are using to come to the conclusion that the average adult female black bear is less than 60kg, to be honest. Not that it would even really matter. It's just the claim you made, is why I'm wondering.

Also, one of these days it would be swell if you would just admit to being wrong without trying to create some sort of qualifier. You need to work on that.
---

"I keep a picture of my butthole in my wallet." - fire810

Paint sprayers make painting so Much easier. I've never had to paint pebbledash before, but it looks like some other very annoying textured facades I've had to tackle. After the initial coat is swallowed by the wall, I'm a bit more careful with the second coat. But man is it so cool to need practically no skill to pull out a halfway decent paint job.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

ChromaticAngel posted...

I mean I just looked it up when you mentioned it.

Sun Bears range from 27 to 80 KG

The average female black bear is less than 60 KG.

But your conclusion is not represented in the data.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_black_bear#Size
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

You don't have a sprayer, I'm guessing.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>

Like.... half of those aren't even nuts.

My nuts are my favorite.
---

I use Google... A lot.... >______>