Lurker > rattlesnake30

DrizztLink posted...

Good lord, he actually thinks he's making a good point, doesn't he?

I don't, but the whole crux of this tweet is that Bill Maher is apparently unqualified to talk about the conflict, and yet other people apparently are even though they are equally unqualified.

Tyranthraxus posted...

You're being pretty generous by saying what Maher did was a "geopolitical analysis"

I didn't use that term, the tweet that was posted did. That's why I put it in quotes.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


What's your solution then to the Israel/Palestine conflict?

So Bill Maher's "geopolitical analysis" is invalid, but the opinions of college kids studying random subjects that aren't geopolitical are valid?

ellis123 posted...

On that particular post they did a follow up post stating that they had no actual proof, but wouldn't take it down.

The post you linked to is from Nov 2023 and is referring to a completely different story than the one we are talking about here. I don't have an X account so I can only see linked X posts.

I saw this a few days ago in response to this story. Any thoughts?

https://twitter.com/GeoConfirmed/status/1782360892249612466

I liked The Killing of a Sacred Deer and The Favourite. Didn't like The Lobster.

I think the premise was interesting, but it never really went anywhere. It felt like the majority of the film was just Emma Stone having sex with ugly men. I had to watch it in 10 min chunks because I kept wanting to turn it off.

The production design and costumes were nice at least. Willem Dafoe was really the best part of the movie.

I don't know. Maybe I just didn't "get it".

I show a picture but it never matches what I show them. I just want a simple cut with buzzers this time.