Frustrated? Annoyed? Rustled? Fill in the blank.
And no, you're still completely describing the situation incorrectly. Your poll asked if my owned firearms were intended for hunting or self-defense.
I said neither.
Then you incorrectly said that guns had to be designed for one of those two things.
So I pointed out that "intent" without context is not a clear enough question, because it's not. Intent of design, intent of use, intent of purchase, intent is not a limited word!
You then said it was clearly defined, which I said not without your addendums and explained why.
Then you said "I'm not going to argue", then continued to insult me with stupidly-contrived analogies, so I continued explaining why you're incorrect. So not only did you say you weren't going to argue anymore, but you deliberately provoked more arguing.
Once again, I'm not being intentionally obtuse. I own firearms that were designed for marksmanship in a sporting scenario. I've been pretty clear about that from my first post. Your addendums still didn't sit right with my answer, but you're being very bullheaded in refusing to accept that.
PokePokePokePokePokePokePokePokePokeXXX
"Bordate is a pretty shady place, what with the gangs, casinos, evil corporations and water park." -FAHtastic