What the fuck is even the context here? Why is this even a question and who the fuck is actually saying that it isnt bad? Who are they talking to? Like holy shitI've only seen clips from whatever that is on YouTube. I think it's just a podcast where people can call in and discuss things. But I've only ever seen it in the context of people calling in and defending Trump's actions while the host debates them.
What the fuck is even the context here?https://youtu.be/_YmDcCpD1gc?si=-wrppSZcD4ZuFp_W
Strong "Umm, actually it's ephebophilia" energy there.*Language nerd energy rising*
https://imgur.com/gallery/M61WCVi
Pretty sure they're 0 states where AoC is 15.That's because pedo shit has always been part of the conservative mainstream. Children are always such attractive targets for those who want to abuse power.
Fucking wild to see right wing main stream media using the arguments that GameFAQs incel pedos used to defend their incel pedo games. The march of progress.
I dont want it in my search history, but isnt legal 15-16 still in 2/3rds of the states?Not really. Like most of the world there's a sliding scale for people who are themselves under-aged or start relationships when they're under-aged that may continue into adulthood even when both of them don't reach adulthood at the same time. Most of these laws are designed to try to set a lower limit of what's acceptable when the older person turns 18. ie: 16 dating 14 would result in 18 dating 16; not that weird. 16 dating 13 would become 18 dating 15...I think most people would find that creepy or at least borderline. Which is why 15-16 often ends up the limit of Age of Consent.
That's because pedo shit has always been part of the conservative mainstream. Children are always such attractive targets for those who want to abuse power.Oh definitely yeah, it's more just the pathetic level the arguments have come to from even the mainstream media.
Oh definitely yeah, it's more just the pathetic level the arguments have come to from even the mainstream media.Seeing how easily Trump corrupts people around him is almost enough to get me to believe in supernatural evil.
Same with the white nationalist bullshit that was spreading online pre 2016 and would have been career suicide back then and now it's just wildly accepted.
It's so fucking depressing that this garbage is considered acceptable now by so many.
https://imgur.com/gallery/M61WCViWTF??
Where's the rest of it? She just abruptly stops mid sentence.The rest of the sentence isn't any better
Imgur is now banned in the UK so I have no idea what everyone is reacting tooWhy is it banned?
Feels bad man
Wait are gifs a thing now in gfaqs?From imgur, yeah, though I only sometimes get them to work. Also from one of the popular gif hosting sites, but I don't recall which one.
Why is it banned?
UK requires you to use your ID To access any site they deem could have adult contentThey were also under investigation for breaking the rules on collecting and storing data from minors. They quit the UK to avoid getting a big fine.
Lots of non-UK sites refuse to jump through those hoops so now they do not work in the UK. Imgur is one of them
Just stick to, "He wasn't attracted to 8 year olds" if that's relevant and leave it at that.It's not clear if that's true or not regardless. He apparently had a ton of CP and I don't think the ages of the victims in that have been made public. Could be anywhere.
It's not clear if that's true or not regardless. He apparently had a ton of CP and I don't think the ages of the victims in that have been made public. Could be anywhere.I wouldn't be surprised.
I don't think the sliding scale for Romeo and Juliet instances have a set minimum do they? 16 would be the de facto minimum, not just due to Romeo and Juliet nuances. Doesn't mean people much older aren't still creep predators of course. And I'm pretty sure no US state has it at 15, just a handful of european countries.Many of them do. I referred to it as a sliding scale because I remember seeing an age of consent chart from Japan once that broke it down by age of younger, age of older, separated by gender (younger female / older male was punished more severely than younger male / older female), and defined where criminality started and ended. I'm sure this sounds clear as mud so I'll use wikipedia from here:
Aside: To anyone not willing to look up age of consent laws because they think it's creepy or weird. Don't be? This stuff should be considered part of standard sex education. Information like this helps protect kids; if in no other way than by increasing public awareness of what the laws are so that people can more adequately recognize when an adult is trying to exploit a child.
https://youtu.be/_YmDcCpD1gc?si=-wrppSZcD4ZuFp_WI wish it were this. Instead, MAGA momma here is downplaying raping children because 15 isnt 8 years old. Shes trying to make it okay.
Huh, interesting, I feel like it would make sense for a sliding scale to just be the age range itself. So would this mean two 13 year olds would get in trouble when two 14 year olds wouldn't? A 13 and 14 would get in more trouble than 14 and 17? Although I suppose there is a minimum for age of responsibility itself so kids below that wouldn't get charged at all although the latter question would still apply.Dunno, to be honest. Knowing more would probably require actually reading the law of specific areas which is a level beyond what I'm willing to research.
We're now in an age where people are frantically googling the nuances of age of consent laws across states to defend the PresidentRemember when some nutjob Trumpet raided a pizza chain because of some conspiracy that Clinton's held kids in a basement?
It pisses me off that people compare this to Idiocracy because Camacho never did any of this crap.
He would have whooped Epstein's ass
I wish it were this. Instead, MAGA momma here is downplaying raping children because 15 isnt 8 years old. Shes trying to make it okay.Frank Reynolds is many things but he aint no diddler
Frank is saying diddling at all is bad. Hes not specifying age. Frank Reynolds is a monster in general, but hes nowhere near as heinous as Tump.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e362ef5b.jpg
Remember when some nutjob Trumpet raided a pizza chain because of some conspiracy that Clinton's held kids in a basement?
Imagine what would happen if Obama had this level of accusations against him. 1/6 would just be an average college rave by comparison.
https://imgur.com/gallery/M61WCVi
That cant be real...not saying it isnt, but damn.....hard to believe there can be people like thisI don't believe it was faked by the hosts. They seem pretty straightforward and honest, but it could be that the caller wasn't sincere.
Frank is saying diddling at all is bad. Hes not specifying age. Frank Reynolds is a monster in general, but hes nowhere near as heinous as Tump.
This is one of the billions of reasons why conservatism needs to be eradicated. They always downplayed or defended this sort of thing.
He was at Epstein's island, but only for the snorkeling.
That cant be real...not saying it isnt, but damn.....hard to believe there can be people like thisUse whatever you can to own the libs.
I remember there was a user here that was trying to peddle the pizzagate conspiracy so hard because supposedly he's an "investigator" of these type of stuff.
He was at Epstein's island, but only for the snorkeling.He only went to Epstein's island to ask for directions on how to get out of there
So they going to be open about this now like they do with racism huh?Yep. There is no longer any plausible deniability. The Republican Party is the pedophile party