At the very least, the writer still has to fact check the output and make sure there are no hallucinations and false statements.
You think they'll do that?Nope. That would involve paying someone, which means line doesn't go up as fast, and goodness knows the execs and shareholders can't have that .
No wonder all their article headlines have "slam" in it. The LLM tokenizer has determined its statistically the most likely text to use .
Nope. That would involve paying someone, which means line doesn't go up as fast, and goodness knows the execs and shareholders can't have that .exactly