wait so once you lose access you can get it back?If you're DToast's friend and/or here to bait more purgs, yes
wait so once you lose access you can get it back?apparently you just have to ask dtoast if you can pretty please come back and post right wing conspiracy garbage and he just lets you in
What was that? I was about to post and then it got closed.
Im not into the Tails drama but how does DToast allow a user here that immediately posts crazy shit like that? Was that real?
Wait what topic?It was an anti-vax topic from a brand new account that the admin personally invited in.
the admin personally invited in.
how do people find out this information?
how do people find out this information?DToast himself said it.
how do people find out this information?by dtoast fucking saying it?
apparently you just have to ask dtoast if you can pretty please come back and post right wing conspiracy garbage and he just lets you in
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80764412/980298968
how do people find out this information?He posted it in ncloud's topic
Are you shitting me?It's true. Account had 3 karma and was made after CE was made private. Posted some bull about the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Are you shitting me?
DToast himself said it.
What if the T in DToast stands for Tails?It wouldn't surprise me if one those people got the job at Fandom just to get this role.
Joking of course but would be funny if it just happened to be some user like that.
:D
So let me see if I've got this straight.
* They made CE private to, among other reasons, make users feel safe.
* The site admin then gave a brand new account access to CE despite it being private.
* The new account immediately promoted anti-vaxx propaganda (i.e. unsafe disinformation).
Is that right?
In the spirit of fairness, what probably happened is toast saw the entire board light up with these terrible policy changes and he made an earnest attempt to actually do something for the community by letting in somebody who didn't have access without knowing or understanding the history of the account or the individual. And then it backfired because it turns out you can't really manage a community if you're not a part of it.Nah, this is entirely incompetent.
In the spirit of fairness, what probably happened is toast saw the entire board light up with these terrible policy changes and he made an earnest attempt to actually do something for the community by letting in somebody who didn't have access without knowing or understanding the history of the account or the individual. And then it backfired because it turns out you can't really manage a community if you're not a part of it.
In the spirit of fairness, what probably happened is toast saw the entire board light up with these terrible policy changes and he made an earnest attempt to actually do something for the community by letting in somebody who didn't have access without knowing or understanding the history of the account or the individual. And then it backfired because it turns out you can't really manage a community if you're not a part of it....wat
Dtoast, can you pretty please un-private LUE?Why
Nah, this is entirely incompetent.
You can't make a huge rule change and then say "well ok, just this once :)" like that
In the spirit of fairness, what probably happened is toast saw the entire board light up with these terrible policy changes and he made an earnest attempt to actually do something for the community by letting in somebody who didn't have access without knowing or understanding the history of the account or the individual. And then it backfired because it turns out you can't really manage a community if you're not a part of it.There is absolutely 0 chance he let in a brand new account that was obviously an alt because he was being earnest lmao