maybe it's just female? Do sexualized male pictures and gushing over get a pass? Seems to be a trend for the west.Nah, I just checked a post where someone was testing that, their posts got removed.
Please dispute that.
Nah, I just checked a post where someone was testing that, their posts got removed.Thanks. Text-only Prudefaqs it is then. I'm pansexual myself, so when I mentioned male, I was thinking of a Leon Kennedy (virtually) nude mod that was popular. Pics of that would be removed then.
Not according to GameFAQs rules, and rules are rules.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/934c98bc.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5134d1af.jpg
I'm glad to get the clarification, and I hope this topic can be used to help other people see the new boundaries.
This is unbelievably dumb lmao
Whats fucked up is this board is private. Who are they protecting?Babysitter and thought police fandom needs to protect the grown adult people. text-onlyFAQs, no pictures. Too risky now because anything can trip off their 'hornypost' alarm
Whats fucked up is this board is private. Who are they protecting?Good question, what purpose is their to censoring such harmless and mundane material on a private board?
Whats fucked up is this board is private. Who are they protecting?
Their advertisers who are perfectly fine with Fandom's other sites that have borderline pornographic imagery.Hypocrisy indeed.
Please dispute that.
Please dispute that.To what end?
To what end?
The fact that the mods are saying this means quite a bit though. And they're the ones who actually communicate with DToast rather than get called "bad faith users" for being critical of Fandom's nonsenseWe've already established that the admins are gonna swap tracks on a whim, that the opinions of anyone not directly in Fandom corporate are worthless, and that they refuse to give any information because we can't be trusted.
We've already established that the admins are gonna swap tracks on a whim, that the opinions of anyone not directly in Fandom corporate is worthless, and that they refuse to give any information because we can't be trusted.
So what's the point in having moderators tell you to dispute?
It won't change the rules, it won't even explain the rules.
i posted 'he's so fucking hot' in that very not subtle Balthier topic and also got hit by a hornyposting moderation, it's great.it really is puritan no fun FAQs. Deleted just for that. wow.
We've already established that the admins are gonna swap tracks on a whim, that the opinions of anyone not directly in Fandom corporate is worthless, and that they refuse to give any information because we can't be trusted.These rules are new to the moderation team just as they are to everyone else. Which means moderations are not going to be perfect at first. Disputing them, is important because it gets the moderation in front of more moderator eyes to catch where mistakes were made so we can collectively be better at enforcing the rules which, will help everyone have a better idea of what it allowed. Because I agree, right now it feels a bit chaotic.
So what's the point in having moderators tell you to dispute?
It won't change the rules, it won't even explain the rules.
Please dispute that.
These rules are new to the moderation team just as they are to everyone else. Which means moderations are not going to be perfect at first. Disputing them, is important because it gets the moderation in front of more moderator eyes to catch where mistakes were made so we can collectively be better at enforcing the rules which, will help everyone have a better idea of what it allowed. Because I agree, right now it feels a bit chaotic.You know what else would help?
Also if it's overturned it comes off your record. Which is good.
These rules are new to the moderation team just as they are to everyone else.
To what end?
You know what else would help?
An actual rule.
In text.
Watch Connorseur's video which cannot be linked here
For real? Fucking cowards
You should know that it wouldn't actually help at all.I'd take a platitude with at least a little bit of something concrete over the outright empty platitudes we're getting instead.
Watch Connorseur's YouTube video which cannot be linked here "Fandom has a censorship problem" for an illustration as to why a rule in text means fuck all.
To provide a baseline and attempt to establish some modicum of consistency with this new rule. For users to appropriately wield the ability they have to correct an incorrect moderation. Doing nothing solves nothing.You're assuming we think it would accomplish anything even if we tried.
To be clear I don't think fandom would object to the content of the video... It's the actual video footage that's the problem. You shouldn't watch the video at work either.
To provide a baseline and attempt to establish some modicum of consistency with this new rule. For users to appropriately wield the ability they have to correct an incorrect moderation. Doing nothing solves nothing.If the site is in the shitter, as seems to be the case, it doesn't matter the amount of navel gazing the mods do on a particular rule. You guys will be ignored until you're dropped.
Not hornyposting related but I just received the absolute dumbest moderation for my Hollow Knight topic that is apparently not disputable because it was a "community" moderation. Lol this board is really going down the shitter
How you have to react to every picture of a person from now onFuck YouTube for ruining this video
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e9a8fac5.jpg
You should know that it wouldn't actually help at all.
Watch Connorseur's YouTube video which cannot be linked here "Fandom has a censorship problem" for an illustration as to why a rule in text means fuck all.
"If you are holding up a picture of a person to applaud them for their dress attire, that is objectifying them"
That was a very interesting watch, thanks for the suggestion. Highly relevant to the gamefaqs situationthanks, gonna watch it now.
That was a very interesting watch, thanks for the suggestion. Highly relevant to the gamefaqs situation
To provide a baseline and attempt to establish some modicum of consistency with this new rule. For users to appropriately wield the ability they have to correct an incorrect moderation. Doing nothing solves nothing.
And you guys still come here everyday?