Honestly the judge should issue up arrest warrants for Fox News execs on obstruction of justice for airing that segment.They should or throw every person but trump and the lawyers out of the room no cameras nothing and if it gets out its trump put his ass in jail
Guess who fell asleep again?
https://twitter.com/TylerMcBrien/status/1780962809951457520
bro juror 4 gotta go
This is how you know you made the right call:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/265851de.jpg
Him being unable to defend himself if he cant violate the gag orders is a stupid excuse. Hes supposed to defend himself in court, not the media
Also, he's not "defending himself" in these Tweets (Truths?) - he's attacking other people. There's a difference.
It's already well ahead of schedule. It was thought that it would take weeks to get to even this point.Losing 2 jurors that have already been seated is also unprecedented
i mean, you are searching high and low for a group of people who are willing to spend months doing nothing but sitting in judgment of donald trump. but these people also can't have held any publicly voiced opinion as to donald trump
not as easy as it sounds
I know this would violate Trump's right to a fair trial, but maybe this trial should be one without a jury. Not only is it incredibly difficult to find someone without a set opinion of Trump, but if they're going to allow him and his allies to intimidate jurors, then Trump doesn't deserve a fair trial.
A bench trial is a thing where one would have a fair trial, but Trump would never agree to that.I also think this lawyers already out a motion for bench trial before him already and the judge denied it.
I also think this lawyers already out a motion for bench trial before him already and the judge denied it.I don't know, but I sincerely doubt that. They wouldn't want a Bench Trial because there are less people to intimidate there. And less delays. And less chances to get a MAGA on the jury. And last but certainly not least, they want this judge removed. I don't see you asking for a judge to be removed and then asking for the judge to sit alone in judgement of you, waiving your right to a jury. I also doubt this judge would deny such a motion.
Could be wrong though.
I know this would violate Trump's right to a fair trial, but maybe this trial should be one without a jury. Not only is it incredibly difficult to find someone without a set opinion of Trump, but if they're going to allow him and his allies to intimidate jurors, then Trump doesn't deserve a fair trial.Right there is where you have a problem.
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1780960157955964930?t=1PmB7OmpGOFZ5dfrHUKBWA&s=19
Fox News needs to be censored again.
Juror 4 is on the chopping block as well. Likely lied about their political activities, an arrest regarding tearing down political posters, and their fascination with Trump.
Him being unable to defend himself if he cant violate the gag orders is a stupid excuse. Hes supposed to defend himself in court, not the media
If Trump/Fox News are not held accountable for intimidation...
Idk if it was mentioned already but just saw a potential juror who was dismissed being interviewed(she said she would not be able to be impartial) and apparently she just became a US citizen in August then got called for jury duty and it happened to be for Trumps case lolInsane that her first time getting called for jury duty is this case of all things
If I became a citizen and got jury duty a few months later Id want my money back
Insane that her first time getting called for jury duty is this case of all things
https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1781059090636021888
Idk if it was mentioned already but just saw a potential juror who was dismissed being interviewed(she said she would not be able to be impartial) and apparently she just became a US citizen in August then got called for jury duty and it happened to be for Trumps case lolI mean, she wasn't purposely singled out. It's a random selection. So getting called for jury duty a few months after becoming a citizen is something that can happen.
If I became a citizen and got jury duty a few months later Id want my money back
https://twitter.com/lawofruby/status/1781059741277392945
Dang, they're moving.
Right there is where you have a problem.Trump has made sure, more than anyone, by his constant violation of gag orders and attempts at intimidating jurors, that he doesn't deserve one. I know this puts me in the minority here, and that's fine, but fair trials assume good faith on both sides of the trial, both prosecution and defense.
Gotta wonder if that shit was intentional. Ridiculous.It's Texas, so almost certainly.
Trump has made sure, more than anyone, by his constant violation of gag orders and attempts at intimidating jurors, that he doesn't deserve one.That doesn't show that he shouldn't get a fair trial though. It shows that he needs to actually be held accountable when he violates rules. He, like literally everyone else ever, deserves a fair trial. What he is getting instead is virtually free reign to say and do things that normal people would not be able to get away with. He has shown that he never deserves the benefit of doubt when it comes to his actions. Simply stopping him from doing things that anyone else would be jailed for doing would be sufficient without violating anyone's rights.
I mean, she wasn't purposely singled out. It's a random selection. So getting called for jury duty a few months after becoming a citizen is something that can happen.
There's also the whole Secret Service protection thing
The trickiest part is interaction with other inmates.
That's easy. Just house him with all the other former presidents convicted for 100 felonies.
I've honestly never understood why this is such an issue. In regards to his security detail, yeah they'd have to physically be there, but not in a prison cell. I'm pretty sure they're not allowed to just wander around freely when personally assigned to him, so I see no difference between standing outside of a door at his house or standing outside of his cell next to a correction's officer.
The trickiest part is interaction with other inmates. I generally don't condone solitary confinement unless they're are an violent threat to others, however Trump's influence is the kind of thing that would realistically lead to a white supremacist gang riot/attempt to overthrow the prison if he were allowed to associate with them as I'm sure they are Trumpers themselves.
So he would need some form of limited interaction with other inmates that's heavily monitored.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1780954575920320623
I mean it's just due to logistics. This is obviously uncharted territory for everyone involved.
...so Narnia?I'm not opposed to sticking him in a wardrobe for a little while