Civil War is getting rave reviews after premiere

Current Events

Page of 3
Current Events » Civil War is getting rave reviews after premiere
GregsMedley posted...
What an unnecessary and untrue thing to say lol. Hell, you even conceded that I'm probably right about COVID and that you simply do not care and accept the risks.

Again, glad you enjoyed your apolitical action flick masquerading as a deep dive into journalism. I hope your are sipping a cup of delicious Twitter leftist tears.
Lmao what? You're definitely confusing BSP with someone else
Steam/Xbox/PSN = NoxObscuras
Z490 | i9-10900K | EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra | 32GB DDR4 3600 | 4TB SSD
GregsMedley posted...
What an unnecessary and untrue thing to say lol. Hell, you even conceded that I'm probably right about COVID and that you simply do not care and accept the risks.
Well, that's wrong. The only thing I conceded was about the risks of long covid are probably worse than I aware of, but I will take that chance at this point .

I find it funny that you claim to be an extrovert, and yet have zero empathy for anyone who wants to socialize even years removed from the 2020/2021 peak of the pandemic. You also refused to ever think about the impacts of the economy, mental health, dependencies, childhood development, etc. And these arguments were happening in 2022 and 2023, not 2020 and 2021. You name called everyone who argued with you with even the smallest bit of a moderate view. And you apologized but then returned to it again shortly thereafter.
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
Post #103 was unavailable or deleted.
Zikten posted...
I'm disappointed that it sounds like they don't go into the backstory of the war. Damnit
Trust me it will be a TV series. Remember Revolution?
I was born when she kissed me. I died when she left me. I lived a few weeks while she loved me-
GregsMedley posted...
There is a huge difference between a kids movie centered around animated birds...and an actual movie about a second American Civil War, void of any political context from a director that outright says "left and right are just ways to run the government" when the American right at large is foaming at the mouth to have a second Civil War.

So you hate having nuance in a movie, which is fine but I still hold onto my opinion that you can't change how people will interpret a movie to see themselves as the hero unless you make the message very on the nose to the point where there's no room for interpretation, which majority of the time makes for very bad movies.
DI MOLTO!
Post #106 was unavailable or deleted.
shockthemonkey posted...
Greg and bsp are both empathetic people, idk the history of you guys going back and forth but this is silly.
Ugh, I agree
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
Post #108 was unavailable or deleted.
Being mad and having a meltdown over a movie you haven't seen and willfully misunderstand the purpose of is top tier CEmanship.
https://i.imgur.com/AUXKMK4.jpg
Prestoff posted...
I still hold onto my opinion that you can't change how people will interpret a movie to see themselves as the hero unless you make the message very on the nose to the point where there's no room for interpretation, which majority of the time makes for very bad movies.
Even then this doesn't work, as seen with people saying that Light did nothing wrong, calling Homelander based when his followers in the final episode of Season 3 literally had the Viking Capitol dude in shot, and the anti fascism messages of Starship Troopers going over people's heads despite Neil Patrick Harris being dressed like a literal nazi.

Speaking of Starship Troopers though, there is actually a comparison and bear with me here, between Johnny Rico and the Jessie character. Both start off each film bright eyed, "oh yeah I'm going to photo the war/kill the bugs just like my idols (who they don't realize are kinda terrible people)" not fully realizing what they're going to be dealing with, then they go through the horrors of war where reality kinda sets in, but by the end they essentially evolved/devolved into the archetype of the character they admired at the beginning where Johnny Rico is now the one in the propaganda piece leading soldiers to war, and Jessie is the more callous photographer who moves on from the death of her idol real quick so she could get front row seats to the Oval Office execution .
PS5s have liquid metal tech like the T-1000- AceCombatX
Game devs don't deserve money- Zithers, in a topic he made on a game site about artists deserving money.
shockthemonkey posted...
Greg and bsp are both empathetic people, idk the history of you guys going back and forth but this is silly.
Do you honestly not see what I am talking about though? I knew he would pop in and criticize my review.
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
Post #112 was unavailable or deleted.
shockthemonkey posted...
I liked your review and could not begin to care about this back and forth. His dismissal and analysis of your review sounded dumb to me. You randomly bringing up him talking about covid sounded dumb to me.

I think youve both said what you want to say to each other about the movie and should leave it at that.
That is fair. I shouldn't have brought up an unrelated topic. I should be better at letting things go.

We actually get along with many things, and like many of the same books.
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
Not watching, I hate doomer movies like this that stir up more rage bait.
Good to hear hes apparently returned to form after his last film wasnt as well-received as usual. On the other hand apparently hes giving up directing now so I guess it doesnt matter going forward, lol.
"It's a simple question, Doctor: would you eat the Moon if it were made of ribs?"
Beany posted...
Good to hear hes apparently returned to form after his last film wasnt as well-received as usual. On the other hand apparently hes giving up directing now so I guess it doesnt matter going forward, lol.
He sorta has one more directing movie. It will be called Warfare and he is co director with Ray Mendoza, who I think is a first time director but was the military supervisor for Civil War. Garland says it is more of a support role he is providing though.

Good news is that Garland wrote the screenplay for 28 Years Later, which will be directed by Danny Boyle. So the same team as 28 Days Later, and neither was involved in 28 Weeks Later.
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
I feel like topics like this perfectly show just how susceptible people are to misinformation, even when they create the misinformation on their own
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Zeeak4444 posted...
I feel like topics like this perfectly show just how susceptible people are to misinformation, even when they create the misinformation on their own
What misinformation?
[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
Sometimes good directors drop a stinker. It's not the end of the world. Ex Machina and Annihilation are still amazing movies.
The simulacrum is never that which conceals the truth, it is the truth which conceals that there is none. The simulacrum is true. Ecclesiastes
FunWithAFryPan
ModernPost posted...
Sometimes good directors drop a stinker. It's not the end of the world. Ex Machina and Annihilation are still amazing movies.
Except its getting amazing reviews
Post #121 was unavailable or deleted.
GregsMedley posted...
Yeah, you're right, it was dumb and unnecessary and I shouldn't have said anything. Thank you for being the voice of reason.

You're not the only one.

We do, and I keep that in mind if ever I see you post and may not agree with it. I shouldn't have been so critical about your review. We've both been vocal about this movie and the "everything must devolve to debate" mode kicked in.
I appreciate that. And I am sorry for bringing up stuff
Currently playing: Cyberpunk 2077
I just don't know what tightrope this film was supposed to walk on. There are people out there who would want a civil war...or worse.
(She/Her) I'm a succubus. Don't worry, I'm not going to hurt you. <3
Video Game IGN: Mystic. Ask me for a joke, I come up with some good ones.
Zikten posted...
Except its getting amazing reviews
lol
The simulacrum is never that which conceals the truth, it is the truth which conceals that there is none. The simulacrum is true. Ecclesiastes
FunWithAFryPan
ModernPost posted...
lol
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/0397ffe4.jpg
ModernPost posted...
Sometimes good directors drop a stinker.
This is true, and it was a couple years ago with Men that he dropped his worst movie which imo had little to offer aside from that one actor pulling a James McAvoy from Split, the ending, and the extremely on the nose messaging. Thankfully Civil War is much better even if it doesn't reach the heights of Ex Machina or Annihilation, because I fucking love those movies so much it would be hard to reach them.
PS5s have liquid metal tech like the T-1000- AceCombatX
Game devs don't deserve money- Zithers, in a topic he made on a game site about artists deserving money.
Zikten posted...
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/0397ffe4.jpg
My god. This changes everything.
The simulacrum is never that which conceals the truth, it is the truth which conceals that there is none. The simulacrum is true. Ecclesiastes
FunWithAFryPan
Post #128 was unavailable or deleted.
CADE_FOSTER posted...
Damn y'all triggered over a movie wtf go outside

People have been triggered over movies for as long as movies existed.
"Well, it's not a bad game. It's made by Capcom, so how could it?" ~ AVGN
CSCA33 posted...
What misinformation?

Thinking the movie is something its not based on impression formation and confirmation biass.

which is representative of how misinformation tends to take hold on people in general.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
Zeeak4444 posted...
Thinking the movie is something its not based on impression formation and confirmation biass.

which is representative of how misinformation tends to take hold on people in general.
People have some valid criticisms of the film, and saying the film wasnt about that doesnt erase or invalidate those criticisms whatsoever, nor does it make it akin to misinformation.
[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
CSCA33 posted...
saying the film wasnt about that doesnt erase or invalidate those criticisms whatsoever
Yes it does. It's like when Jarhead got ripped apart because people thought it was an action war movie. People are free to dislike something because it wasn't what they expected but it is in no way a films fault if people misinterpret its intent and try to take it out on the movie itself. "Why doesn't this film take a stance on modern American politics" is just as valid as "why doesn't this movie take a stance on American football".
https://i.imgur.com/AUXKMK4.jpg
specialkid8 posted...
Yes it does. It's like when Jarhead got ripped apart because people thought it was an action war movie. People are free to dislike something because it wasn't what they expected but it is in no way a films fault if people misinterpret its intent and try to take it out on the movie itself. "Why doesn't this film take a stance on modern American politics" is just as valid as "why doesn't this movie take a stance on American football".
Sounds more like you just dont like the criticism and attacking it because of your own personal bias, tbh.

You dont have to agree but the criticism is certainly valid when you have a film about a modern US civil war. It doesnt have to pick sides in your strawman to provide context or information about the conflict. We already knew early on that the filmmaker was distancing themselves from the current political climate, as well.

I have no idea why youre bringing up football, do you really need to grasp for straws that quick?
[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
CSCA33 posted...
People have some valid criticisms of the film, and saying the film wasnt about that doesnt erase or invalidate those criticisms whatsoever, nor does it make it akin to misinformation.

some people do have valid criticism about the movie. Its not a perfect movie by any means lol.

but a majority of the complaints are absolutely irrelevant to the film and based on misinfo.
Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X
I hope someone in the future takes another crack at this concept but goes deep into the background lore on how the war happens and focuses on the fighting instead of reporters. I'd love a military focused Civil War 2 story. Maybe it could be a series on streaming instead of a movie
Is this a historical dry US Civil War Oscarbait flick or is this something I should care about?
Zwijn posted...
Is this a historical dry US Civil War Oscarbait flick or is this something I should care about?
Its set in modern day. Actually I think its supposed to be a little bit in the future. Maybe 10 years from now. And its about a 2nd American Civil War
Zwijn posted...
Is this a historical dry US Civil War Oscarbait flick or is this something I should care about?
Definitely a good film and worth watching. They dont explicitly use words like democrat or republican or trump supporter but the film absolutely explains what is going on, why, who is doing what, etc. It is not ambiguous, nor does it shy from politics, however, this is largely done through clever use of inference and implication with some smattering of expositional dialogue.

So idk if some folks just like trolling or w/e and pushing peoples buttons probably, typical around these part of the woods.

[click here] pronouns incoming
SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS
Current Events » Civil War is getting rave reviews after premiere
Page of 3