Nope that's 100% a foul
Well if Lebron James, the softest, whiniest pussy in the NBA thinks its a bad calllebron has an infinitely higher bball iq than anyone on this board
lebron has an infinitely higher bball iq than anyone on this boardLebron has an infinitely higher hairline than anyone on this board.
I'm a little concerned by the weird underlying racial tension/conflict that seems to follow Caitlin Clark everywhere.
complete basketball noob, but is that really a foul?not usually, but refs have some leeway to use their own bias.
I thought that was clearly a moving screen. She wasn't set by any stretch of the imagination.I posted a literal screencap of it where her legs are a mile apart and arms extended
complete basketball noob, but is that really a foul?
I noticed this too. I thought it was just an Iowa/LSU thing but it seems more.I think conservatives have latched onto her as a racial champion. They like when she defeats black players. Its unfortunate. I have seen no evidence that she herself is racist
This whole dumb convo reminds me of when Kadarius Toney was so clearly off sides and people were like "omg just let them play!"LOL, yeah.
I think conservatives have latched onto her as a racial champion. They like when she defeats black players. Its unfortunate. I have seen no evidence that she herself is racistDo we really have to do this shit about literally everything? Maybe she's just really good and people are paying attention.
Do we really have to do this shit about literally everything? Maybe she's just really good and people are paying attention.Go out and tell the racists to stop being racist and hoisting up people in a "great white hope" style.
LOL, yeah.
So your argument should be about the other calls, not this one that was clearly a foul.
So youre agreeing that it was a clear foul at the end and your objection is to other calls or lack of calls in the game.
Yeah exactly, a foul is always a foul no matter what the clock says.
I don't know basket ball rules too well or basketball in general. But would it really have mattered? It's not like uconn got a 2 pointer in after that anyways which would tied the game had Clark not gotten from the free throw. If the score had only ended up being a 1 point difference I could see bitching being warranted.These kind of things always rely on rampant speculation. What we know is that it was objectively, unambiguously a foul. Ref called it right.
You sound just a little biased.I wouldnt call him soft, but he does get calls no one else gets because of who he is.
I think conservatives have latched onto her as a racial champion. They like when she defeats black players. Its unfortunate.They definitely have, if my conservative/racist coworkers are any indication.
These kind of things always rely on rampant speculation. What we know is that it was objectively, unambiguously a foul. Ref called it right.
If the foul wasn't called, we delve into the unknown. Maybe UConn scores. Maybe they don't. Even if they do, the best player in the league has at least a few seconds to drain another 3 and take the lead right back. It's more or less pointless to ponder what could have been. Best to stick to facts.
Fans when their team is winning: "The refs are being totally fair!"
Fans when their team is losing: "The refs are biased and paid off! It's totally rigged!"
I think people should ref a game one day. I'm sure somethings are happening so fast mistakes get made. You the viewer have a different angle on things.
Exactly. Those sitting at home have the advantage of watching replays and can see the whole field/court. The officials have to make split-second calls and can only see so much since they're there in person and often watching whoever has the ball/puck.