Biden brought that up himself and then couldn't remember the year until someone reminded him. I give Biden a pass on that; it's not remembering he was VP in 2009 that's alarming.
The section in the report that deduces how a jury would decide is also preceded by: "there are other innocent explanations for the documents that we cannot refute." In this topic, I was told that Hur's only defense of Biden was framed in a utilitarian way that inappropriately speculated how a jury would decide, but when I read the report for myself, I saw that clearly isn't true and that there's language in the report that stands on its own in defending Biden. I also read some unfair parts, like insinuating that Biden's vulnerable presentation would convince the jury one way, but Hur ALSO mentioned in that same sentence how that applies to his own investigation as well as the jury and that Biden convinced Hur to some degree.
Currently playing: Skyrim, Hearthstone
Training log: https://powpowpunishment.blogspot.com