1. Stewart is seen as different from mainstream media, thus people have higher expectations of what his content should deliver.
The situation would go from shitty to apocalyptic pretty fuckin' fast.When there was 5-4 Republican split they would sometime vote with the Democrats. They wanted a faade of professionalism so Democrats would do nothing when traitorous Mitch McConnel extrajudicially stole seats from Obama. At 6-3 they have no need for a faade.
ButteryMales posted...Yes, really.
Their problem is Stewart criticizing Biden.Really? I think it would have been far better if he did a whole segment on Biden and Israel. That's a very fair critique of his presidency, and something that actually talks about policy - not age.
ButteryMales posted...I meant it literally. What would change if they managed to get a 7th, 8th, or 9th conservative Supreme Court Justice if Trump gets a 2nd term. People seem to think they would be more comfortable crowning king Trump when they already had a majority and a chance to make him a king of the United States.
What would even change if it was 7, 8, or 9 conservative justices on the Supreme Court?What do you even mean by this question? Please be more specific.
I meant it literally. What would change if they managed to get a 7th, 8th, or 9th conservative Supreme Court Justice if Trump gets a 2nd term. People seem to think they would be more comfortable crowning king Trump when they already had a majority and a chance to make him a king of the United States.Good lord when people ask ridiculous questions like this.....
Good lord when people ask ridiculous questions like this.....Such a verbose pointless way to say nothing much would change.
It's like people like you scream you don't know how to see the bigger picture. If you have to ask what the big deal is if Trump got 7, 8 or 9 Supreme Court picks, you are exactly the type of person Republicans adore.
I have no idea what you're trying to say. What other further left candidate? If Bernie disappeared/died before the primaries for 2016, I don't think anything would be different in the democratic party besides a huge maybe of Hillary winning. It's definitely the Overton window and not Bernie. After Obamacare every candidate was in favor of a public option or more.
So we agree becoming more progressive isn't a bad thing?
Edit: Elizabeth Warren might have won in 2020 being the sole progressive.
No, attitudes against Hillary weren't nearly as intense until people on the left had a specific reason to resent her, which was that they weren't getting their socialist dreamscape leaning candidate.Hillary didn't lose because socialists in the swing states disliked her. Benghazi is still the same, "but her emails" is still the same, "it's her turn" is still the same, "drain the swamp" is still the same, and Trump would be seen as just as or more for healthcare with "repeal and replace" as a unknown quantity. In this hypothetical parallel world it's actually might have more socialists vote for Trump.
Such a verbose pointless way to say nothing much would change.Is the goal here to further my point with this post that you are clueless that things would indeed change. Because I must admit you are doing a fantastic job!
Is the goal here to further my point with this post that you are clueless that things would indeed change. Because I must admit you are doing a fantastic job!It's almost like I asked a question and didn't get an answer. If you have all the knowledge and clues then how did you make it through your entire life not knowing how to answer a question?
Yes, really.
What would change if they managed to get a 7th, 8th, or 9th conservative Supreme Court Justice if Trump gets a 2nd term. People seem to think they would be more comfortable crowning king Trump when they already had a majority and a chance to make him a king of the United States.
That doesn't even begin to address anything I said. You can't complain somebody doesn't answer your question when basic reading comprehension fails you in this same topic.
That's nonsense. Their problem is Stewart criticizing Biden.Somehow you turned "Their" into "Your" in your* brain and that's somehow my fault.
Who cares if it helps trump take over the country and turn us into 1990's Iraq, at least Jon Stewart got to make fun of an old man and both sides a clearly one sided debate!ClayGuida and most other people complaining are angry Jon Stewart criticized Joe Biden.
1. The problem isn't about him replacing the Liberal justices with conservatives (although that would certainly be bad). The issue is him replacing Alito and Thomas with young MAGA conservative judges.They're 73 and 75. If Biden wins they could die in these last 4 years but I doubt it. Copmala Harris is a joke so in 2028 I think the Republicans will probably win and just replace them then.
2. A democratic president might actually be able to replace Alito and Thomas with liberal judges and create a majority to right some wrongs.
3. You keep assuming the arguments of others. No one in this topic has mentioned anything about the Supreme Court making Trump king.
People seemI guess you don't know what the word "seem" means.
Because they're pretty fuckin' worried about Project 2025.The only thing different from
They're 73 and 75. If Biden wins they could die in these last 4 years but I doubt it. Copmala Harris is a joke so in 2028 I think the Republicans will probably win and just replace them then.
You're not even engaging with my arguments.You mean "my arguments" as "pistachio12's arguments" or "their arguments". I have to ask you because of your terrible reading comprehension.
If you'd rather argue semantics, you can find someone else. (As a side note, you might not know what *people* means as I was included in that category and why their actually meant our.Why would I want to bother arguing semantics with hypocrite like you who can accuse someone of poor reading comprehension but buckles like a kitten when the accusation with proof is thrown back at them? I don't want to do this. What I would rather happen is for you to answer this question; If I said "People seem to like Trump." does that mean I was saying "You like Trump."?
if voters actually started paying attention to our judicial system, maybe they'd realize the importance.So we need a miracle for anything to be different. Sounds like nothing would change like I implied from the beginning.
Bernie was 81, cheered by youth.
Biden is 80 whatever, chastised by youth.
Good chat everyone. Let's see Bernie handle Israel, Ukraine, the economy, & MAGA all at once better than Biden.
Why did Stewart leave the show to begin with?I think he was burned out.
Another post where you ignore almost everything I post to instead argue semantics. Enjoy trolling someone else, you clearly have enough time for it.You're not going to misread everything I write and just run away. Oh no, please don't.
Why did Stewart leave the show to begin with?His health wasnt great.
Hillary didn't lose because socialists in the swing states disliked her. Benghazi is still the same, "but her emails" is still the same, "it's her turn" is still the same, "drain the swamp" is still the same, and Trump would be seen as just as or more for healthcare with "repeal and replace" as a unknown quantity. In this hypothetical parallel world it's actually might have more socialists vote for Trump.I'll never forget how she lost Pennsylvania. "If you're in the coal industry you're gonna lose your job! Right tim?
Hillary didn't lose because socialists in the swing states disliked her. Benghazi is still the same, "but her emails" is still the same, "it's her turn" is still the same, "drain the swamp" is still the same, and Trump would be seen as just as or more for healthcare with "repeal and replace" as a unknown quantity. In this hypothetical parallel world it's actually might have more socialists vote for Trump.
@Midnight is back as After Midnight, I always loved that format.Its great. Taylor Tomlinson is killing it as the host plus the comedians on the panels are usually great. Very funny show
The real problem was so many on the farther left in the country helping to drag her name through the mud and giving fodder to Trump supporters, accepting such labels as the lesser evil, the same way so many are doing with respect to Biden right now.In his wikipedia James Comey is described "was a registered Republican for most of his adult life".
In his wikipedia James Comey is described "was a registered Republican for most of his adult life".Which perfectly explains his ratfucking October surprise.
Do you actually think anyone here is saying that only the far left had issues with Hillary?No. You should be asking LoZguy709 what he means by
The real problem was
No. You should be asking LoZguy709 what he means by
Why you brought up James Comey is beyond me.You literally quoted me mentioning "but her emails" which includes James Comey then nonsensically pivoting back to leftists being "the real problem".
You literally quoted me mentioning "but her emails" which includes James Comey then nonsensically pivoting back to leftists being "the real problem".
Her emails were always a bunch of propped up bullshit. Same shit Republicans are doing to Biden on the basis of his son. They're always going to find some dumb shit to get their sheep Fox viewers to go on about.So the real problem is Republicans?
Her emails were always a bunch of propped up bullshit. Same shit Republicans are doing to Biden on the basis of his son. They're always going to find some dumb shit to get their sheep Fox viewers to go on about.A big part of the problem with "but her emails" was that it was amplified by people who should know better than to do that.
So the real problem is Republicans?
A big part of the problem with "but her emails" was that it was amplified by people who should know better than to do that.
Everyone expects the right wing noise machine to do its thing, so what needs to change is nobody credible should be running with any narrative from the right wing noise machine.
A big part of the problem with "but her emails" was that it was amplified by people who should know better than to do that.James Comey was a part of the Obama administration so you should be time traveling and telling Barack Obama not to give Comey credibility.
Everyone expects the right wing noise machine to do its thing, so what needs to change is nobody credible should be running with any narrative from the right wing noise machine.
Was I not supposed to take that as a given in this topic?You should have. We have already talked about how your first post in this topic was whataboutism nonsense that has nothing to do with the episode of the Daily Show.
James Comey was a part of the Obama administration so you should be time traveling and telling Barack Obama not to give Comey credibility.
You should have. We have already talked about how your first post in this topic was whataboutism nonsense that has nothing to do with the episode of the Daily Show.
This seems really freaking tangential though so forgive me if I really don't know what point you're trying to make here anymore.I wasn't talking to you there. I honestly don't care what you thought about it.
I'm just gonna let Jon Stewart do his thingGreat, mission accomplished for me.