"In review, ProCon takes an issue such as gay marriage and breaks it down based on pros and cons, looking at both points of view. Each issue is well-researched and presents information in a factual and low-biased way."I couldent have put that better myself.
I don't agree with what they may cover on the website as a whole but they aren't trying to skew your perception one way or the other. In the way you described them. Leave that to rest.
Most people's point, which you are ignoring, is the "left" side comes from PhDs and medical journals and the "right" come from self identified Christian experts writing essaysActually, that is not universally true about that site
So not at all fair comparisons
i wouldent call it a site promoting hate ... Its just allowing both sides to have a mouth pieceProviding a platform for hate
The point is you have science and educated people who have been studying the subject on one side and bias, opinion, and religion on the other for the most partWell the very first time i read Procon.org is because i wanted to hear both sides to the argument on "should prostitution be decriminalised?", i wanted to reconsider my position on it, and because not everyone in the con section were pastors or ministers (most were secular people) from that first time experiance i came to the conclusion of "this site is secular".
Having a few isolated examples doesn't account for the majority being that way
Providing a platform for hateI would again refer you back to the holocaust example and why that is not appropriate to present "both sides" as if they are equal, and the same can be said about this side presenting hateful bigotry as a debate with a valid side. There is no merit to it. They might as well have a pro/con debate about owning slaves in the US civil war era. But again this is about what is socially acceptable and culturally relevant, and that is a problem which needs to be addressed.
The site is offering itself as a parley, that's why it allows BOTH sides to speak on subjects. Its called Procon.org, not Leftwing.orgHate speech does not deserve a place at the table of anything.
Okay? I disagree. I find that website to be harmful and perpetuating misinformation and hate-speech. So what is your point?My point is that the use of the site is up to the person. Right now, you are using it as defamation piece where you can use it better for your own argument. To point out that there are no legitimate statements or science for markers for the side that is weak. This would better enhance your argument while taking into account the other side.
My point is that the use of the site is up to the person. Right now, you are using it as defamation piece where you can use it better for your own argument. To point out that there are no legitimate statements or science for markers for the side that is weak. This would better enhance your argument while taking into account the other side.Thats not how the site itself presents that information, though. You could say the same thing about forums that host discussions from white supremacists or tweets from trump. The source is not reputable or trustworthy in those discussions, and it is harmful content.
In reality, facts don't always convince people but at least you can shoot down while acknowledging their points.
I don't know. I'd say any person who voices opposition to LGBTQ+ rights on religious ground need to agree to a test to prove they practice what they preach, constantly before their voice can be given platform.Person A forcing person B to live by the standards of person A's religion is bullshit, whether or not person A is a hypocrite.
Refusal means rejection and any signs of the slightest vice (Again movie/show/book with even the slightest bit of profanity).
I don't know. Is there any case where it's morally acceptable to limit what others do/gain based on religion while granting yourself many exceptions?
Person A forcing person B to live by the standards of person A's religion is bullshit, whether or not person A is a hypocrite.The things that are published on Procon.org are not "forcing a way of living" on anybody. You can read those paragraphs and sentences on there that leave a sour taste in your mouth, and then just ignore it and move on.
Person A forcing person B to live by the standards of person A's religion is bullshit, whether or not person A is a hypocrite.
The things that are published on Procon.org are not "forcing a way of living" on anybody. You can read those paragraphs and sentences on there that leave a sour taste in your mouth, and then just ignore it and move on.The issue with procon.org, as already mentioned several times, is that some of the issues it gives pro and con on are simply not up for debate among civilized people.
The things that are published on Procon.org are not "forcing a way of living" on anybody. You can read those paragraphs and sentences on there that leave a sour taste in your mouth, and then just ignore it and move on.
The issue with procon.org, as already mentioned several times, is that some of the issues it gives pro and con on are simply not up for debate among civilized people.To add to this, many schools host political debates in social studies or history class and use resources like this one to foster debate, assigning students essays to write on the subject. As of 2009, schools in all 50 states were regularly using material from that specific site to have classroom debates and as teaching material. The site itself also presents itself as material for teachers to use.
Two examples (of many) are teaching creationism in school science classes, and gay marriage.
The issue with procon.org, as already mentioned several times, is that some of the issues it gives pro and con on are simply not up for debate among civilized people.
Two examples (of many) are teaching creationism in school science classes, and gay marriage.
Well, now all of this makes sense. You weren't taught critical thinking skills which are absolutely taught in school. I'm sorry you didn't get a great education.
I checked out this pro-con org website and saw an old section where pro and con views on teaching creationism in school science classes were collected.
IMO that's a clear case of putting lying bad faith garbage (i.e., creationism in science classes) on the same footing as sensible thinking (i.e., science in science classes).
This is a perfect example of an issue that is simply not up for debate, since the creationist side is all lies and bullshit.
Many other right wing issues fall into this category.
This is katanablade aka greenmistyuck
The responses he's getting are feeding into his victim complex
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/9397737e.jpg
There is no middle ground to abortion. And that website is 100% hate-speech.I for one am shocked that a poster in their mid 50s who buys wigs to make transphobic videos instead of seeking gainful employment, posted a website with hate speech
Why would you think otherwise?
There is no middle ground to abortion. And that website is 100% hate-speech.
Why would you think otherwise?
Yep, saying there's no echo chamber in CE is like saying there's no french people in France.So what was the name of your main account?
The motto of that place should be "Go with the grain or go away"
True.
That katanablade person is antivax, looking at their post historyMy guess is that's greenmist on an alt.
Others are saying he's greenmist.Yeah what I figured. It makes the most sense.
greenmist having a melty on the chudreddits about this topic.Rent free
Rent freeWell of course. He lives at home with his mom.
katanablade will you send me a link to your youtube channel, i'll watch that video with the rainbow hair, or at least try to watch it as long as I can. I remember watching part of your video about the politics board 261 when someone linked it herehttps://m.youtube.com/@galvatron3214
https://m.youtube.com/@galvatron3214Oh. Late 50s huh.
I completely agree. Clearly they are wrong. You are right. You are literally a force of good fighting against evil people.You can keep your sarcasm. There is no middle ground on LGBTQ rights
You can keep your sarcasm. There is no middle ground on LGBTQ rights
Ha ha, whoever this person is, that's a pretty funny video there i think, i just watched it. Also the latest video they uploaded about someone having problems with watching Jeopardy because of their father is funny aswell
The responses he's getting are feeding into his victim complex
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/9397737e.jpg
Ha ha, whoever this person is, that's a pretty funny video there i think, i just watched it. Also the latest video they uploaded about someone having problems with watching Jeopardy because of their father is funny aswell