hockeybub89 posted...
You say "You can't use AI to create art" and make it law.
This is something you would like the government to do. You would like some form of art police, ensuring the purity of all artworks. Somehow.
If humans don't even have art to themselves, then why do we even exist? Are we going to let AI love too? Capitalism would probably find a way to let AI give birth to children if it was possible.
Weird slippery slope fallacy. Why would allowing AI art prevent humans from making art? Why cannot the handcrafted stand alongside the mass machine produced, as it already does in many areas?
As for AI taking over love and childbirth, how does that even work, are you writing a bad sci fi novel?
The imagination should not be something where humans are replaced
Your imagination is not replaced. You remain free to imagine whatever you like.
with machines merely imitating emotion.
All art 'imitates' emotion. It's not the emotion itself, but a representation.